Troopers' gun purchases questioned by Norris

Status
Not open for further replies.

gun-fucious

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
1,977
Location
centre of the PA
Troopers' gun purchases questioned by Norris


http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/bal-md.guns28jan28.story

Troopers' gun purchases questioned by Norris
Rifles were displayed at Townsend speech in last year's election
By Laura Barnhardt
Sun Staff

January 28, 2003



Maryland State Police officials said yesterday that they are investigating troopers who bought two assault rifles that were displayed at a news conference held by former Lt. Gov. Kathleen Kennedy Townsend while she was running for governor.

Col. Edward T. Norris, who was appointed the new superintendent of the state police by Gov. Robert L. Erhlich Jr., questioned whether the rifles were bought as props to help Townsend's campaign.

But David B. Mitchell, Norris' predecessor, strongly denies that, contending the rifles, a Bushmaster and a Colt AR-15, were bought for testing and were later used at the news conference to illustrate a loophole in state law regarding the purchase of assault weapons.

The rifles, purchased with state police funds, were exhibited during an Oct. 29 news conference in Rockville when Townsend proposed a ban on assault-style weapons in the wake of last fall's sniper slayings. A Bushmaster rifle has been linked to the two sniper suspects.

Norris described the purchase of the rifles as "inappropriate" yesterday.

"We're not the wing of a political party," Norris said. "We're the police."

At least two troopers -- a captain and a detective sergeant -- from the Firearms Enforcement Division, were involved in buying the weapons, which cost several hundred dollars each, officials said.

Investigators from the State Police Internal Affairs Division are reviewing whether procedures for purchasing and storing the weapons were properly followed, Norris said. It appears at least one of the weapons was stored at a trooper's house, officials said, a possible violation of departmental policy.

Mitchell said yesterday that Townsend's campaign had nothing to do with buying the rifles.

"I'm suspicious about the timing of this investigation, which began right after a new administration took over," Mitchell said. "I think it's all about politics."

He said he was among more than a dozen police chiefs in the state at the news conference in Montgomery County after the sniper attacks.

"This was not a campaign event," Mitchell said, who was criticized by the trooper's union for supporting Townsend's candidacy. "I don't go to campaign events in police uniform. And I was in uniform that day."

"The point of the press conference was to point out there is a loophole in Maryland law regarding the purchase of assault-style weapons," said Mitchell, who was directed by Townsend to draft a bill that would ban assault-style weapons. "I think there's a difference between using money for policy purposes and for political ones."

Mitchell said state police frequently testify before lawmakers and make purchases to illustrate the need for policy changes. For example, he said, state police made charts and graphs when then-Gov. Parris N. Glendening announced the speed limit would be raised from 55 mph to 65 mph along some highways.

Townsend could not be reached for comment yesterday.

It is not clear whether police will use the rifles, which have been returned to the property room at headquarters in Pikesville, for another purpose. Members of the Firearms Enforcement Division occasionally buy guns for testing purposes, officials said.

The investigation into this particular purchase was launched early last week, Norris said.

"The rank and file waited for a new administration before they brought this to the attention of Internal Affairs because they feared retaliation," the superintendent said. "They speak of a circle of fear. The allegations being investigated came from troopers, not from me."

Mitchell said he had no doubts about the integrity of the captain and detective who are being investigated and have been transferred out of the firearms division.

"It's ludicrous to accuse these two officers," said Maj. Tom Bowers, who supervised the two troopers.


Copyright © 2003, The Baltimore Sun
 
The MSP didn't have a couple of AR's laying around the armory that could have been dragged to the soccer mommy panty wadding confrence as props? Something smells here, but it is MD so not too much is surprising in regards to their anti gun campaign.

Greg
 
All police departments, at least in metro areas, are used as political tools in one way or another. If Sheriffs are elected officals isn't that political? Unfortunately good troopers, sheriffs, and police get dragged through the mud because of the actions of their higher ups and elected officals.
 
Ok... Let's CLOSE...

The Law Enforcement loophole then.

No reason for cops to have Assault weapons anyway... shotguns ? yes. Pistols ? Yes
Homeland defense weapons? maybe for selected officers...

But certainly not ASSAULT weapons, and most certainly not for the MSP.

Close the law enforcement loophole !
 
You mean that the Maryland State Police could not locate two confiscated assault-style weapons in the ENTIRE STATE and had to buy two for testing and/or political display?
 
I don`t think we ever paid for a new weapon to play with. The dealers and manufacturers fell all over themselves to try and sell us their wares. It`s called "Test To Destruction". Just like gun rag writers don`t pay for anything.

Not political? Welcome to the party pal!
 
"I think there's a difference between using money for policy purposes and for political ones."
This is either meaningless or extremely dangerous.
Anyone who believes that policy is somehow some sacred, objective area of life is on his way to being a dictator.
All policy is political, which is to say, it should be made by the people and their elected representatives. It is inherently subject to political debate and battle, which is how differing opinions get worked out in a democracy. The belief that changing gun laws is not "political" shows how self-righteous such people are - they think no one could possibly disagree with them.
 
I now have another reason to like Norris. As Baltimore City Chief of Police he brought a sharp decline in the overall and violent crime rates (regardless of how bad they are now, they are much better than they were and would be). The best thing Martin O'Malley (the mayor of Balt) ever did was bring this guy in from NYC.

"I'm suspicious about the timing of this investigation, which began right after a new administration took over," Mitchell said. "I think it's all about politics."
Yeah right. He's been selected to be the new head of the state police by a Republican governor so he must be a Republican and everything he does now is because he is a conservative Rep and he's doing it for political reasons:rolleyes: . Wonder what this guy thought when Norris was Baltimore Chief of Police and he was appointed and supported (he was very controversial because he was successful and some segments of the city weren't happy with that) by a Democratic mayor (who is the son-in-law of our extremely anti-2nd attorney general). I guess Norris must have changed his party affiliation and loyalties with the new job eh.:rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top