Evidence is ALWAYS withheld from the jury in some fashion or another, that's nothing earth shaking.
Every civil and criminal trial that takes place has certain evidence that for one reason or another is not admissible.
That won't ever change, nor will saying that if not for that withheld evidence the outcome would be different.
Now, it may very well have changed the outcome, but evidence has to undergo a strict test (or is supposed to let's just say) to test it's validity, admissibility, etc.
One side is always <upset> that evidence does not meet that, the other side is ecstatic.
BUT the question is how does she have any rights in this country if she is not a citizen????
That one gets touchy. Some (including the founding dads for the most part) believe(d) that God alone gives rights, it is just up to a government to recognize and protect them. Quite a long argument on both sides but interesting for sure.
Personally I am glad he's out, but this problem is going to get worse and worse regardless of which side you believe is right.
One way or another there will be much violence and bloodshed over this issue I am afraid.
