The M9 is history! Sorry if anyone has already mentioned this...
http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htweap/articles/20060127.aspx
http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htweap/articles/20060127.aspx
Zerstoerer said:For military use a .45 FMJ might be better but ballistically it is equal to a .32 ACP HP!
Thank God. Its about time.
But, there's something about knowing you have 14 rounds of .45 ACP on hand needing no reload that tends to bolster confidence that one is by no means "out-gunned".
When the Army stops treating it's support command like the lowest form of dirt and we receive the the fair amount of training time we ask for we will handle our weapons. That's our job, if we don't.. we get killed. There is no such thing as a front line anymore. I can handle any weapon you can, blindfolded and just as profficient.rero360 said:You know what would be really good, but it wont happen, if they were to give the REMFs something like the SIG or CZ, and give us fighters 1911s, I mean, think about it, its all about trainability, the combat MOS troops are generally better suited to learn to handle multiple weapon systems, I mean, I haven't touched a M240B in a couple of years, they're not on our MTOE, but I know I can take one apart and put it back together again blindfolded in short time. where as alot of REMFs that I've witnessed on various ranges over the years are hard pressed to handle even their 16s properly, but thats not their job.
While I'm sure the SIG is a great weapon, I've never handled one, but heard nothing but good of them, I think the 1911 platform would be better suited for the grunts and MPs in service. At least thats what I want, what can I say I'm biased.
Dr.Who said:Gee, I wonder if they will go with a 1911 style or maybe the new XD45ACP.....
Hmmmm.....