U.S. Erodes High-Tech Privacy Protections

Status
Not open for further replies.

w4rma

member
Joined
Aug 13, 2003
Messages
724
Location
United States of America
By MICHAEL J. SNIFFEN, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - When Congress curtailed Pentagon research it feared would ensnare innocent Americans in the terrorism fight, it also allowed the Bush administration to eliminate two projects to protect citizens' privacy from futuristic tools.

As a result, the government is quietly pressing ahead with research into high-powered computer data-mining technology without the two most advanced privacy protections developed for those terror-fighting tools.

"It's very inconsistent what they've done," said Teresa Lunt of the Palo Alto Research Center and head of one of the two government-funded privacy projects eliminated last fall.

Even members of Congress such as Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., who led the fight to restrict the Pentagon terrorism research over its privacy implications, remain uncertain about the nature of the research or the safeguards.

"We feel Congress is not getting enough information about who is undertaking this research and where it's headed and how they intend to protect the civil liberties of Americans," said Chris Fitzgerald, Wyden's spokesman.

The privacy projects were small parts of the Pentagon's Terrorism Information Awareness research.

The project was the brainchild of retired Adm. John Poindexter, who was driven from the Reagan administration in 1986 over the Iran-Contra scandal. Some 15 years later, he was summoned back by the Bush administration to develop data-mining tools for the fight against terrorism.

Poindexter's new software tools, far more powerful than existing commercial products, would have allowed government agents to quickly scan the private commercial transactions and personal health records of millions of Americans and foreigners for telltale signs of terrorist activity.

Partly to appease critics, Poindexter also was developing two tools that would have concealed names on records during the scans. Only if agents discovered concrete evidence of terrorist activities would they have been permitted to learn the identities of the people whose records aroused suspicion.

One privacy project worked with Poindexter's Genisys program, which scanned government and commercial records for terrorist planning. The other was part of his Bio-ALIRT program, which scanned private health records for evidence of biological attacks.

Late last year, Congress closed Poindexter's office in the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) in response to the uproar over its impact on privacy.

But Congress allowed some Poindexter projects, including some data-mining research, to be transferred to intelligence agencies. Congress also left intact similar data-mining research begun in the fall of 2002 by the Advanced Research and Development Activity (ARDA), a little-known office that works on behalf of U.S. intelligence.
...
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tm...e=8&u=/ap/20040314/ap_on_go_co/terror_privacy
 
It would seem that past "democratic" presidents and their administrations had no problems broaching this subject, albeit unsuccessfully.

I only wonder how the democratic operatives posting on this board will spin it when sKerry gets elected and his security and intelligence apparatuses pull the same thing. Better yet, let's see if they roll back any part of the Patriot Act or increased ePrivacy infringements enacted during W's tenure.
 
clbj wrote:

Ladies and Gentleman, prepare to don your tin-foil!

I get really tired of this. clbj, maybe you mean to be cute, but let's all be perfectly clear: "tinfoil this, tinfoil that" really means "I think you're a moron." I'm curious to know how this Total Information Awareness program relates to your Thomas Jefferson "tree of liberty" signature. Either I misunderstand, or its the height of irony.

I don't mean to pick on you, clbj, because I see it all the time on THR, but its an easy (lazy?) way to ridicule and dismiss what may or may not be valid ideas or topics of discussion.

316SS
 
Certainly, this is a development to fear. It's already a way of life in Europe, and unfortunately our Constitutional protections are being eroded day by day in the name of "security". I suspect that in many ways, the process has gone too far to be turned back. What little privacy we have left must be jealously guarded and protected vigilantly... :uhoh:
 
No ridicule intended. I am a proud tin-foil hat wearer myself. I realize it is a serious situation. Relax. I am on your side! :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.