U.S. probes Afghan body desecration charges

Status
Not open for further replies.

rick_reno

member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
3,027
I would agree with the comment at the end, this doesn't look good.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9755213/

U.S. probes Afghan body desecration charges
If true, incident would apparently violate the rules of warfare

WASHINGTON — The Army tells NBC News its Criminal Investigation Division is looking into an Australian broadcast report with video that allegedly shows U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan burning the bodies of two Taliban fighters, then using the incident to taunt Taliban forces.

SBS, an Australian public broadcast network, aired the story Wednesday night. U.S. Army officials confirm that a free-lance cameraman working for the network was embedded with the 82nd Airborne at the time of the alleged body burning.

According to the network report, one American, one Afghan soldier and two Taliban fighters were killed in a firefight near the village of Gonbaz in southern Afghanistan. The report says the next day the bodies of the two Taliban fighters were laid out facing west and burned in a "deliberate desecration of Muslim beliefs.” The cameraman who shot the video said the soldiers claimed they were told to burn the bodies for "hygiene reasons" because they had been out in the open for 24 hours and started to decompose.

'Cowardly dogs'
But the report says U.S. soldiers then broadcast "an inflammatory message over loudspeakers to taunt and bait the enemy."

A transcript of the story has an apparent sound bite from a Sgt. Jim Baker saying, "Taliban, you are all cowardly dogs. You allowed your fighters to be laid down facing west and burned."

Traditionally the burning of a body is a deep insult to Muslims and Muslims try to bury their bodies facing Mecca.

U.S. military officials confirm at least part of the story. They tell NBC News that two Taliban had been killed in a firefight and that U.S. soldiers had asked people in the village to retrieve the bodies, but no one had come forward for at least 24 hours. They say they are not sure what what happened next.

According to U.S. Army officials, if the bodies were burned and members of a psychological operations team then used the burnings to taunt the enemy with a broadcast message, that would be in violation of U.S. Army procedures and an apparent violation of military law.

The Army officials spoke on condition of anonymity because the case is under investigation.

They say the burning of the bodies would be an apparent violation of the rules of warfare regarding the desecration of bodies.

Military officials, however, have not seen the tape and are withholding judgment pending the probe by the Criminal Investigation Division. But according to one U.S. Army official, "This doesn't look good."
 
All's fair in love and war. Besides, if they don't follow the rules, why should we? Would it be okay if we started lopping/sawing the heads off our prisoners too? Why not send a couple of cruise missiles into Mecca or Dome of the Rock?

And how does anyone expect to fight a war, a WAR, in a "politically" correct fashion? :banghead: :cuss: :banghead:
 
I recall the pictures some time ago of dismembered westerners burned and strung up danced around cheering masses. no one likes to see that sort of thing, but I mean what should they have done, given them a proper burial after they were attempting to kill them? I think it was a clever idea personally, I am tired of all these hurt feelings from all the bleeding hearts and whistle blowers... I say keep up the good work. they have shown no mercy to american POW's, if a country violates geneva convention rules and whatnot, why should we abide by them. lets start sending pig fat lined body bags, and we can even bury them facing east... out of respect and all. :uhoh:
 
...if they don't follow the rules, why should we?

We're the forces of civilization. If we descend to barbarity, we're no different from the Islamic terrorist savages.

That said™, there is no polite, nice, civilized, clean way to fight land wars in Asia. The U.S. Air Force could easily have settled the entire Islamic terrorist savagry problem with a single flight.
 
All's fair in love and war. Besides, if they don't follow the rules, why should we?

We are standing up in front of the world and saying "WE are the good guys", that means that we have to show better behavior than the bad guys or we have no business fighting this war in the first place.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top