Unique Walker

Joined
Apr 6, 2015
Messages
497
Somebody ruined the barrel but it's nothing a new one won't fix. The question is what did they do to the insides?
 
I am a big fan of useable sights on cap guns, but there are better ways to get there from here.

Of course, it might still be a fine gun for somebody who is completely oblivious to anything other than pure function. $450, though, strikes me as laughable. That number gets you very close to a brand new gun, which can then be mangled to suit any desire.
 
Last edited:
Barrel has been cut as well. If it's an ASM it has a short arbor that needs to be fixed before any serious shooting happens. I have seen some examples of a folding leaf rear sight on some of the big horse pistols.
 
I am a big fan of useable sights on cap guns, but there are better ways to get there from here.

Of course, it might still be a fine gun for somebody who is completely oblivious to anything other than pure function. $450, though, strikes me as laughable. That number gets you very close to a brand new gun, which can then be mangled to suit any desire.
Like this…

IMG_4662.jpeg IMG_4663.jpeg IMG_4666.jpeg
 
Since it's an Italian repro the mods don't bother me a bit. I hate original guns of any kind modified, but I actually like good mods done to modern guns.
 
Is that a 10/22 carbine folding sight on there? I admire function even at the expense of aesthetics, but there wasn’t much effort on this one.
 
Is that a 10/22 carbine folding sight on there? I admire function even at the expense of aesthetics, but there wasn’t much effort on this one.
Track of the Wolf and others have plenty of suitable sights fore and aft and as long as you’re cutting dovetails, two are not much harder than one…
 
Despite being something of a "sight snob", I'm perfectly happy with the hammer serving as the rear sight. I open up the "V", creating a square-notch sight picture perfectly replicating those found on modern centerfires. Then I dovetail in a front blade, file it for elevation, and drift it for windage - and then never change the load! On a good gun, this is as shootable and as accurate as my centerfires, so I don't feel the need to dovetail in a rear sight.
 
Despite being something of a "sight snob", I'm perfectly happy with the hammer serving as the rear sight. I open up the "V", creating a square-notch sight picture perfectly replicating those found on modern centerfires. Then I dovetail in a front blade, file it for elevation, and drift it for windage - and then never change the load! On a good gun, this is as shootable and as accurate as my centerfires, so I don't feel the need to dovetail in a rear sight.
I change the V to a U. That works for me. And...it works pretty darn good. (with any type of front sight, original cone, or taller blade)
DSC07594.JPG
 
I never thunk of a square cut. Yes, that would work well. Yeah...that dang flyer. Maybe there was an air bubble in that ball. Swaged ball. Dang. Actually, I kind of wonder if it was the first shot from a clean barrel, but I don't know.
 
I never thunk of a square cut. Yes, that would work well. Yeah...that dang flyer. Maybe there was an air bubble in that ball. Swaged ball. Dang. Actually, I kind of wonder if it was the first shot from a clean barrel, but I don't know.
Sprue misplaced most likely. It happens every so often… hornady swaged ball are notorious for air pockets…
 
Back
Top