Value Analysis & Firearms Purchases

Status
Not open for further replies.

mnrivrat

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
5,373
Location
MN
Value Analysis & Firearms

A simple way of looking at the term value analysis is to say it is a method by which you can determine the usefulness of a product for your application, vs the cost of the product . In manufacturing it is used to look at the cost vs value of all aspects of the product your making.

The idea is to evaluate the cost of each component of the product with cost reduction as the goal.

Example: For those familiar with the Mossberg 500 series shotguns, there is an annoying little problem with breakage of the plastic safety button. The change from metal to plastic was most certainly made as a cost reduction decision by Mossberg.
This decision would have been made under a "value analysis" proposal where it was determined that the reduction in mfg. cost would justify or off-set any changes in the quality or performance of the product. (in this case someone might have made the incorrect choice in my opinion)

So how does that relate to me you ask ? Well , I think I just gave you one example .

To be as clear as I can in making the point however, It is my belief that you can use value analysis to your anvantage as a consumer/purchaser of firearms. Wether you like it or not, it effects the product you buy in one way or another. Understanding how, is one of the keys to making good choices when you lay down your hard earned cash.

Both value analysis of the product itself and analysis of your needs/wants is important and should mean something to you. Let me present a couple thoughts on why and let you determine some others:

1.) The product itself :
Makes no difference who the manufacturer, or what the cost , there are good guns, and not so good guns, that have been made. The degree to which this exists falls into several catigories. (here is three)
a.) The design of the product
b.) The quality of materials
c.) The quality of the manufacturing.

When choosing a particular gun all three of these should be considered.

2.) Personal preferance & performance needs:
What are your needs & wants as well as your expectations and budget..
Here is where costs can be a factor, as well as personal desires and fit . (here is three)
a.) What caliber or gauge
b.) What type action
c.) Cost

There of course is more that can be added. (and talked about) I started this simply as a thought process and not as a specific guide . If there is interest I will follow up with some additional thoughts regarding specifics.
 
SM

That is certainly one of the issues valid to this subject. With the age of stamped parts etc, the quality of fit generaly has suffered. Probably the most widely known example of this is in the pre-64 Winchester issue.

Your comment regarding the early S&W guns when compared to late manufactured is also a good example.
 
Logic and firearms purchases?!? Probably a good idea, but I've got to admit... emotion (gotta haves) and brand loyalty drive move of my buys.

Joe
 
Good point Joe

And nothing wrong with that as long as one recognizes the risks. If you are a Remington loyalist for example and bought their new Viper .22 rifle , you likely didn't turn out so good.

That doesn't mean that Remington guns are no good - it simply means they put out a poorly designed product in the Viper . There are complete disasters that were manufactured in the past by almost every gun company I can think of.

Part of the concept here is trying to avoid those type of disasters when purchasing. The idea is to be happy with your purchase for a long time to come .

The personal wants, desires, and needs help dictate the purchase. Looking cool, as mentioned earlier, is a personal perspective and a very ligitimate factor for most of us.

A gun that looks cool, but is a functional disaster is not likely to make us all that happy in the long run. A cool looking gun that does everything else you want it to do, will however inhance our experence of owning that firarm over others that are available. Best bang for your buck so to speak.
 
Okay, I admit....I had a "plastic" gun, w-a-y- early on.

Yes girls and boys even before Gaston Glock . Yeah we had guns before Gaston hit the scene.

IN fact I still recommend this "plastic" gun.

< gasping , hand wringing of forum members>

" Oh no, say it is not true...not Steve...no, no, "

Remington Nylon 66 .

Still contend one of the best .22 autoloaders ever made. I preferred the butt fed model , no mags, and easy to practice safe muzzle control when feeding .

Okay , you can quit gasping and wringing hands now. ;)

OH ...Hey I stillkinda had the blue and wood dealie...brown Nylon :p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top