Very neat! British knew of Washington's Crossing the Delaware...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mike Irwin

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2002
Messages
7,956
Location
Below the Manson-Nixon line in Virginia...
From AOL-Time Warner news...

"WASHINGTON (AP) - Through a spy, the British were tipped
off that George Washington would be making his famous
Christmas night crossing of the Delaware, but the information went
unheeded, according to newly reviewed papers of the British
commander.

The papers from the archive of Gen. James Grant were found in
the tower of his Ballindalloch Castle, northwest of Aberdeen,
Scotland.

A day after Washington's 1776 victory at Trenton, Grant wrote
what apparently was a draft of a report to an unnamed superior.
He said that he had relayed good information on Washington's
plan at 5 p.m. Christmas Day to Col. Johann Rall, who
commanded the Hessian garrison at Trenton, but that Rall had
failed to take precautions.

``It is some comfort to me that I gave them previous notice,'' Grant
wrote. ``It was rather better intelligence than I could be expected
to have so soon after I was appointed to this command. No man
in America knows the channel through which it came except the
Genl. who I let into the secret before this cursed affair happen'd.''

Grant's spy is still unidentified.

Some historians say Washington had a spy of his own, John
Honeyman, who supplied food and liquor to the Hessians for a
Christmas party. There is no mention in Grant's account of the
party or its effects, usually given as a cause of Washington's easy
success early next morning.

After the war, a British intelligence officer said Washington had not
been militarily superior to the British commanders but had
prevailed because he had a better spy network.

Three weeks after the Battle of Trenton, Grant drafted another
letter saying his worst fears after the British surrender there had
come true. Washington, who had foreseen possible disaster before
Trenton, got reinforcements and was on his way to attack
Princeton. After a short campaign he won back New Jersey,
which he had given up the autumn before.

Grant seems to have run several spies on Washington's
headquarters. Another of his papers records:

``Mr. Wharton is gone to Philadelphia for Intelligence will be at
Washington's tomorrow. Lowrie is to meet him there, will be in the
Jerseys next (day?) & I shall hear from him immediately. Lowrie is
to purchase Rum to the amount of twenty thousand Dollars at
Philadelphia with Continental money & to store it there till the
(money?) arrives.''

He also records information ``given by Genl. Mercer's deputy.''
American Gen. Hugh Mercer died at the Battle of Princeton.
Wharton and Lowrie are not identified on this page of short notes.
Nor do they say what was to be done with the rum.

The Library of Congress learned of the collection at Ballindalloch
in 1999. Its owner, a descendant of Grant, said the library was
welcome to look. James Hutson, head of the library's manuscript
division, went to Scotland and had Grant's 12,000 papers copied
onto 50 rolls of microfilm now at the library.
 
I'm in the middle of a book on the revolution, and it mentions this bit of unheeded intel as well. It says the 'spy' was just a local Tory citizen, though. Apparently Rall was having too good of a time drinking with his staff to be bothered about messages.
 
What I find interesting about Trenton is the approach techniques used by Washington. Multiple single columns in Indian file (single line) approaching from different directions to encircle a foe. Combine this with attacking at night and especially when the enemy is known to be half alert (b/c of the Xmas celebration). Amazing considering most of Washington's battles were in the European fashion (linear tactics).

BTW, a lasting tribute to Washington's victory may be seen at Carlisle, PA. The military barracks there has a stone bldg that was built by the Hessian PoWs during the war. It's open to the public today. BTW, just outside of the barracks is a German 88 mm antitank gun.
 
Ah, the Hessian Guard House...

Yawn...

Sorry, Gary, I went to Dickinson, and grew up 18 miles away in Marysville!

Can't even begin to tell you how many times I've been there.


As for Washington's tactics at Trenton, I think there's a very good reason why he used those tactics...

Braddock's Field.

The French & Indians got to within 100 yards of Braddock's troops before the British knew they were there, and did it in much the same way.
 
What better teacher of forest warfare than the American Indian? At Braddock's Defeat, Washington himself was targeted by Redhawk who fired about 11 times at him. After missing so many times (and Redhawk considered himself a good shot), he felt that the Great Spirit was protecting him so he desisted from further attempts. Destiny did play a fortune and we may be singing, "God Save the Queen" if Redhawk succeeded.

Braddock took measures to protect against surprise too. He had a vanguard supported by light artillery, flankers and even a rear guard. Unfortunately for Braddock, his men weren't trained for forest warfare and when they got whacked, did they. Somehow, the Indians were too smart to stand up to volley fire and decided to "skulk" and shoot from behind bushes and trees. They were especially drawn to those sword waving guys with epaulettes.

Whereas the Croats & Bulgars gave rise to the European tradition of La Petit Guerre (and the final result was the jaeger whether German, Austrian, Russian or as the French called them, chaussers), the American Indians did the same for this continent. Funny though that while the Americans learned it, except for those who were on the frontier, we also forgot it and constantly turned towards Europe for military influence. When you look at the training of sharpshooters during the War of the Rebellion (as the Civil War was called back then), very little training went into camouflage, movement and most savvy sharpshooters drew upon their experience as hunters. The First Michigan SS learned camouflage from the Indians in Co. K (dabbed mud on clothes or rolled on dirt to blend the uniform). Still, nothing in either training manuals (Hardee for Conf. & Casey's for Union) had anything other than troop movements and both were based on European works.

Think about the 2/7 in Vietnam. This is the sister battalion to the one protrayed in the Gibson flick, We Were Soldiers Once... And Young. They got overrunned by a regt of NVAs, almost in the manner of Braddock's defeat. The ambushing party laid in wait until the 2/7 was perfectly aligned with them before springing the ambush. It makes me wonder if we learned?

Sorry about all the loose thoughts. Still trying to weave it together into a bigger picture for my fractured mind.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top