precisionshootist
Member
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2007
- Messages
- 186
Would a politician or member of the media would be called a Nut Job for standing up for a clear and concise 2nd amendment infringement?
When it pertains to machine guns. Yes they would.
Would a politician or member of the media would be called a Nut Job for standing up for a clear and concise 2nd amendment infringement?
It is imperative to recognize the ban of any classification of weapon as a stepping stone to total confiscation! Which is exactly how they did it in the U.K. , Canada and many parts of Europe...
They started with the full autos, then the semi-autos and so on... and now they are gone...
I'd rather have an SBR. With ammo prices, and all other prices, where they are now, full auto is just a waste.
full auto is just a waste.
when I hear something go "bump in the night" I would love to be able to grab a H&K MP5SD
Also with all this effort we could be putting into a probably fruitless swipe at federal law, we could instead by trying to repeal anti-gun laws on the state level, such as the "assault weapons" ban over here in CT
Whats so bad about a potential federal gun registry?
If we aren't talking about repealing the entire '86 law
Machine guns have been registered since 1934, they just closed down the registry in 1986, so no new machine guns can be registered, the result is that many pre-'86 MGs cost more than a new car. Whether or not the "ban" is lifted, there will still be registration. As for registering of all firearms to ward off bans, that's appeasement, and history shows us it doesn't work out so well. I bet UK gun owners wish they would have kept that can 'o worms shut.Whats so bad about a potential federal gun registry? I would rather have registration then bannings of fire-arms, especially if most of the federal bans would be removed.