They already HAVE passed such laws. That's why there's no such thing as a "gun show loophole".
So why do the media keep blathering about a nonexistant loophole? Gee, I guess they don't realize. Well, I'm sure that as soon as someone points out the truth, they'll print retractions and stop using the phrase in the future.
I don't think so.
Wake up and smell the coffee! All this "loophole" blather is part of a deliberate agenda to not only eliminate gun shows, but ALL privately held guns. And that's ALL it is.
Montgomery County, Maryland banned all gun shows a few years back. The Brady Campaign wants laws passed requiring every gun show visitor to be FINGERPRINTED at the door!
But its NOT about gun shows. It's about villifying and stigmatizing gun ownership. It's about hemming us in with ten thousand "reasonable" restrictions. Ammunition taxes. Microstamping. "Ballistic Fingerprinting". Bans on lead bullets. "Saturday Night Special" bans. Hollowpoint bullet bans. "Large capacity magazine" bans. "Semi-automatic" bans. Bayonet lug bans. Pistol grip bans. Bans on "that thing that goes up." "Smart gun" legislation. Safe storage laws (as in disassembled). Waiting periods. Background checks. Firearm Owner Identification Cards. Purchase Permits. Banning guns that aren't accurate enough. Banning guns that are too accurate. Banning guns that are too scary looking. Banning guns that aren't scary enough.
Banning guns. Banning guns. Banning guns. THAT'S what it's about.
But not just that. It's about restricting your Fourth Amendment protection from illegal searches. It's about eliminating your Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination and double jeopardy. It's about ignoring the constitutional prohibition of ex post facto laws.
It's about claiming the Second Amendment is just there so the Militia can have guns. It's about claiming the First Amendment is mainly about protecting flag-burning and government-funded homo-erotica, while protecting us from dangerous Christmas decorations on public property.
The Constitution is a VERY inconvenient document. There are a LOT of "interests" who want to eliminate it entirely. They have already made a LOT of progress.
Hysterical blather about nonexistant "loopholes" is purely intended to stir up
anti-gunowner anxiety, as a deliberate step towards "reinterpreting" the Second Amendment out of existence. That in turn is a major front in the already-far-advanced campaign to reinterpret the entire Constitution out of existence.
That's what this is all about, and that's ALL it's about.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
(By the way, a precursor to this rant can be found in this thread:
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?p=4195168#post4195168
It IS a fact that I can walk into any gunshow in this state and buy a gun without a background check.
But you miss the point of their rhetorical Big Lie Boogyman. You're talking about "Face-to-Face", which you can also do at the shooting range, or even an International House of Pancakes. They are up to something far more insidious than you realize.
There is no more a "Gun Show Loophole" then there is an "International House of Pancakes Loophole".)
ravenous hordes of miniature pink elephants
What caliber for miniature pink elephants?