Old Fud
Member
First have a choice, then answer the question.
We all seem to be missing a few key points here that have been obvious in the past 2 weeks.
The people who did it themselves had a CHOICE . 80% of NO got into there vehicles and bailed out, providing whatever pre-planning and Bug-out facilities they had prepared and loaded. Those people were in a position to deal with preacherman's question and, if they so decided, to answer it as most of you are doing.
IF you find yourself dealing with government-provided evacuation, you are going to do it by their rules.
I felt for the families who carried their pets to the collection centers and then were forced to leave them behind when the buses came, but I felt for the officials as well. The situation was desperate, they decided and acted in favor of saving HUMAN lives, so sorry too bad. I hoped that those same officials that wouldn't let the pets on board had the humanity to dispatch the critters immediately. I wish I knew that is what they had done.
I agree that, in PARTS of the city, evacuation is mandatory. And the question is whether the citizen is going to wait for the government to do it "for" (to?) him or to face the requirement and do it himself.
And again, if he waits, then he will subject himself to and abide by the "provider's rules". If he does it himself, then he can answer Preacherman's question.
With that in mind, have at it, my friends.
(For myself, one of the lessons learned this past week is that I MUST purchase one of those super-sharp folders and have it handy for putting down pets on the way out the door to save human lives.)
Fud
We all seem to be missing a few key points here that have been obvious in the past 2 weeks.
The people who did it themselves had a CHOICE . 80% of NO got into there vehicles and bailed out, providing whatever pre-planning and Bug-out facilities they had prepared and loaded. Those people were in a position to deal with preacherman's question and, if they so decided, to answer it as most of you are doing.
IF you find yourself dealing with government-provided evacuation, you are going to do it by their rules.
I felt for the families who carried their pets to the collection centers and then were forced to leave them behind when the buses came, but I felt for the officials as well. The situation was desperate, they decided and acted in favor of saving HUMAN lives, so sorry too bad. I hoped that those same officials that wouldn't let the pets on board had the humanity to dispatch the critters immediately. I wish I knew that is what they had done.
I agree that, in PARTS of the city, evacuation is mandatory. And the question is whether the citizen is going to wait for the government to do it "for" (to?) him or to face the requirement and do it himself.
And again, if he waits, then he will subject himself to and abide by the "provider's rules". If he does it himself, then he can answer Preacherman's question.
With that in mind, have at it, my friends.
(For myself, one of the lessons learned this past week is that I MUST purchase one of those super-sharp folders and have it handy for putting down pets on the way out the door to save human lives.)
Fud