Good on mindset but her understanding of fights seems to remain very weapon-centric. The "rice crispy treat" simulating her gun just didn't come out fast enough before he closed the distance...etc, etc. She attributed this to a deficiency in her speed rather than in her overall approach to dealing with that problem...I feel that trying to speed-draw on a rapidly advancing attacker is a losing proposition in real life. I thought maybe the training she got addressed that mindset/skillset issue, but I had to shake my head as the issue reared its head once again toward the end of the article:
"Put the muzzle of a .45 between you and his hands. "
Bad idea! Gotta deal with those hands, not just expect a weapon to psychologically stop someone close enough to touch you...
Then there is the issue of her faith that her karate (I think it was karate right?) buddy could execute some kind of neck breaking move, or shove the small bones of her nose up into her brain...these are moves that are impossible to practice against pressure because if they do work, they are very injurious...so no one knows anyone who actually executes those moves enough to be proficient in real life.
I believe the combat sports guys have it right: practice moves that are effective but not inherently maiming/lethal, because you can work them under pressure. Trying to do that strip-mall karate stuff that you haven't practiced full-tilt, and your sensei hasn't practiced full-tilt, and HIS sensei didn't practice full tilt, etc...is not a good way to become proficient at really defending yourself. Totally unverified material, if you ask me.
Hate to be that guy who picks apart something other people enjoy and like, but this is S&T and I don't like to see fallacies promoted. The article did contain some valuable and good thoughts, too, however.