So, all things being equal, what's better for concealed carry: Glock 36, Wilson Compact CQB, or a Kimber Pro Carry II?
Having used a Glock 27 for years, I'm one of those people who views it as an utterly reliable, workhorse weapon with a darn-near indestructible finish. It also is . . . kind of boring.
I recently picked up a full-size .45, but it's too big to carry (for me, at least).
So, I'm thinking of the three guns named above.
The Glock 36 seems to share all the plusses of its smaller brother, the 27, but it too is kind of boring. However, it is significantly less expensive than the other two weapons, and is reliable enough to bet my life on.
The Wilson gets rave reviews, but the price! Jeez Louise! The Wilson Polymer KZ-45 sounds interesting, but I'm not crazy about the proprietary magazines.
Kimber sounds like a nice in-the-middle choice, but I've been hearing some disturbing things about their reliability.
So, what do you folks think?
Having used a Glock 27 for years, I'm one of those people who views it as an utterly reliable, workhorse weapon with a darn-near indestructible finish. It also is . . . kind of boring.
I recently picked up a full-size .45, but it's too big to carry (for me, at least).
So, I'm thinking of the three guns named above.
The Glock 36 seems to share all the plusses of its smaller brother, the 27, but it too is kind of boring. However, it is significantly less expensive than the other two weapons, and is reliable enough to bet my life on.
The Wilson gets rave reviews, but the price! Jeez Louise! The Wilson Polymer KZ-45 sounds interesting, but I'm not crazy about the proprietary magazines.
Kimber sounds like a nice in-the-middle choice, but I've been hearing some disturbing things about their reliability.
So, what do you folks think?