I was chatting with the RSO at a local range recently about the different firearm disciplines. He noted that of the three (handgun, rifle, shotgun) the handgun is the most challanging at which to become proficient.
I first learned to shoot with a pistol, and it might be because my formal training comes from that discipline that I find his theory to be debatable. For me the basics of the rifle are far more challenging to master. The distance to target is longer and the firearm requires far more physical involvement. The best analogy I can use here is: a handgun does well with a firm "handshake". A rifle requires a loving embrace. The shotgun -- our beloved scramble-club --- well, a firm shoulder and a loving home.
So what's your take on this? Is there one discipline over the others that is generally accepted as being more challenging? Are you more gifted in rifle, shotgun, or handgun? Do we have any 3-gun prodigies among us? I know I'd like to be one of those "3 gun grand master" fella's who can pick up any gun anywhere at any time and pop off a 3 round group right to point of aim. Sadly --- NOT!
I first learned to shoot with a pistol, and it might be because my formal training comes from that discipline that I find his theory to be debatable. For me the basics of the rifle are far more challenging to master. The distance to target is longer and the firearm requires far more physical involvement. The best analogy I can use here is: a handgun does well with a firm "handshake". A rifle requires a loving embrace. The shotgun -- our beloved scramble-club --- well, a firm shoulder and a loving home.
So what's your take on this? Is there one discipline over the others that is generally accepted as being more challenging? Are you more gifted in rifle, shotgun, or handgun? Do we have any 3-gun prodigies among us? I know I'd like to be one of those "3 gun grand master" fella's who can pick up any gun anywhere at any time and pop off a 3 round group right to point of aim. Sadly --- NOT!