Anna's Dad
Member
I am planning on selling either my H&K USP 9mm or my Smith & Wesson M&P 9mm. I just really don't need both as they are similar in form and function. I think I may be a little more accurate with the M&P, but probably not significantly so.
Here are the comparisons:
M&P:
- Polymer 9mm, striker-fired, DAO (sort-of)
- Standard rail
- Night sights
- Purchased via auction w/ FFL transfer & gov't background check
- Have original box paperwork, etc.
- S&W has a pretty good warranty / service reputation
H&K:
- Polymer 9mm, hammer-fired, DA/SA
- Proprietary rail (but I have a slimline adapter)
- Standard sights
- Purchased face-to-face in a private transaction
- Have original box, paperwork, etc.
- H&K thinks I suck and they hate me
Which you would keep and why?
Here are the comparisons:
M&P:
- Polymer 9mm, striker-fired, DAO (sort-of)
- Standard rail
- Night sights
- Purchased via auction w/ FFL transfer & gov't background check
- Have original box paperwork, etc.
- S&W has a pretty good warranty / service reputation
H&K:
- Polymer 9mm, hammer-fired, DA/SA
- Proprietary rail (but I have a slimline adapter)
- Standard sights
- Purchased face-to-face in a private transaction
- Have original box, paperwork, etc.
- H&K thinks I suck and they hate me
Which you would keep and why?