Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You are using the old High Contrast theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.
Some have hollow buttstocks - these would be even lighter.
To lighten the SKS I used to have, I just dremel-cut the bayo lug completely off as close to the bbl as possible, along with the bipod I had had connected via this lug. Beyond that, dunno how to lighten it.
There was a thread on Survivors SKS forum where they were comparing the synthetic stocks to the originals. It turns out that the aftermarket stocks were heavier! Even those specifically marketed as light weight.
You don't say what kind of SKS you have, but the lightest stock is probably the original Norinco wood stocks. The fiberglass "Jungle Stocks" weigh about the same.
I would love to lighten one up but I cannot see how. The bolt weighs a ton, maybe an aluminum receiver? Anything I can think of requires complete re-engineering.
Many people reccommend Choate stocks for the SKS. I have an old Monte Carlo on one of mine marked Combat somethingorother... It is a decent stock. The reviews on ATI are mixed. I am considering getting an ATI for my SKS Sporter only because they are the only company that seems to make one for this SKS variant (takes AK mags). If anyone knows of another company that makes a drop in stock for this gun let me know.
By the way the poster that indicated that wood was probably lighter is right. We are not talking about high density hardwood here. The stock SKS I have is lighter than the one with the Monte Carlo stock by far. Can't compare a Fiberforce style for folding stock style. I imagine those would be lighter than the nylon Monte Carlos.
Wood is still a good option for stocks. I really like my all original SKS. It does have a rubber buttpad that extends the LOP about an inch. The SKS Sporter is the lightest of the bunch. It has a shorter barrel though.
Thanks for all the replies. Maybe I'll just forget trying to make it lighter and look to making it fit me better. Sounds like I might get better LOP if I get one of the synthetic stocks.
Is the Choate better than the Ramline? Is there a Hogue or something better?
I've got the Choate Dragunov-style stock on mine, very nice. Can't comment on the Ramline and Hogue stocks, but the Choate is worlds better than the ATI POS I used to have... ATI's drag-style stock is crap compared to the Choate, it's cheaper though so...
Avoid the ATI Dragunov stock -- there is a huge unnecessary hump of plastic that sticks up right behing the receiver cover which makes it IMPOSSIBLE to field strip without taking the stock off (which is a pain anyway). Some very careful hacksaw work will remove that hump, but going with a Choate is easier.
A cursory inspection of both didn't leave me with any impression of major differences between them.
The Ramline doesn't come with a recoil pad, the Choate does, but for 7.62x39, who needs one?
They (and the Butler Creek version) only seem to differ in the styling of the grip. And they are all within a couple dollars of each other.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.