Why converting Fudds is important

[F4GIB]

In some ways I'm surprised it took them this long. On Valentine's Day, 14 February, Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-NY) began a campaign to grab just about everything but Cupid's arrows with the introduction of her bill, HR 1022, "to reauthorize the assault weapons ban, and for other purposes." This is the same Carolyn McCarthy who introduced HR 297 on the first day of the new Congress, attempting the most massive expansion of the Brady Law since its 1993 passage. McCarthy's murky definition of "assault weapons" notwithstanding, the legislation's intent is to re-enact the 1994 Clinton gun grab, while adding a few million more firearms to the haul.

All this leads me to wonder whether the anti-gun crowd simply skips over that pesky constitutional amendment stuck right there between the First and the Third.

http://www.townhall.com/Columnists/...a_valentines_day_massacre_of_the_constitution

 

[AndyC]

Well, y'know, all this talk about "converting Fudds" kinda reminds me of the joke...

"How many shrinks does it take to change a lightbulb?

Only one - but the lightbulb has got to want to change..."

 

[Mannlicher]

Active anti gunners are not ignorant, nor are they amenable to
'conversion'. They are, pure and simple, your implacable enemy. They will not debate, discuss, or entertain any compromise about guns.
The silliness I read here, and on other venues, about how to treat with an anti gunner, would be humourous, if it were not showing how ignorant Second Amendment supporters are about their foe.