Why do Americans own guns?

Status
Not open for further replies.

pax

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
9,760
From http://www.uexpress.com/unconventionalwisdom/viewuw.cfm Published in July of 2001, but I only just now saw it. :)

UnConventional Wisdom, by Richard Morin

IN GUNS WE TRUST

We all know why so many law-abiding Americans own guns: Some buy them for protection against crime. Others collect them as objets d'art. Some love to hunt or target shoot.
But two Ohio State University researchers argue there's another significant factor behind America's infatuation with firearms: Many Americans who own guns don't trust the federal government. Sociology professors Robert M. Jiobu and Timothy J. Curry assert that this mistrust complicates government efforts to control the sale and possession of guns. In fact, they suggest that gun control laws may have exactly the opposite effect: "To mandate decreased gun ownership through gun control legislation may only encourage those people who have little faith in the government to stockpile weapons," they claim in the latest issue of Social Science Quarterly.

Curry and Jiobu analyzed data collected between 1988 and 1996 from the General Social Survey (GSS), the nation's most closely watched barometer of social trends. The survey included questions about gun ownership and three questions that asked how much confidence people have in the executive branch of government, in the Supreme Court and in Congress. Overall, the researchers found that 44 percent of the more than 6,000 respondents had "hardly any" confidence in at least one of the government branches -- "significantly more than expressed similar levels of mistrust in the 1960s," Curry said.

They also found that those who mistrusted all branches of the federal government were significantly more likely to own a gun (37 percent) than those who trusted all three (23 percent) -- a finding that remained strong even after they controlled for relevant variables such as political ideology, gender, age, education, general fear of crime, whether the respondents had been crime victims in the previous year, whether they or someone in their household hunted, what region of the country they lived in and whether they lived in a city, in the suburbs or in a rural area. "If a policy goal of the federal government is to decrease gun ownership among the general population, then our results suggest that increasing trust in government ought to be an equally important goal," Jiobu and Curry wrote.

Well, duh. How many people do you know who went out and bought an eeeeevil black 'assault rifle' just cuz the gov't was about to pass a new law?

pax
 
| Well, duh. How many people do you know who went out and bought an eeeeevil black 'assault rifle' just cuz the gov't was about to pass a new law? |

BUNCHES!
 
I had been looking for an AK variant, when Clinton banned importation of more "assault rifles". I responded by buying an SLR-95 the very next day. :D

I trust my Govt, really I do.
Honest, I wouldn't lie. ;)

:neener:
 
Golly, I was a decade or two ahead of these supergeniuses in Ohio. I read about this guy, Little Jimmy Madison, and HE didn't trust the federal government and he had a hand in designing it!:p

Guns are for shooting people. If you want to know who those people are, just read the works of our government--Washington, Madison, Jefferson, Jay, Hamliton, Mason, Lee, etc., et al.
 
During the Watts riot of 1965, I sat on the roof of my parent's home with a .22 rimfire rifle across my lap. From my vantage point I could see into south central Los Angeles. I could see the fires and the smoke. If the wind was just right, I could hear gunfire.

I worked at the Crenshaw May Company department store. On the second day of the riot I think, I was sent home early. I think that night the display windows were broken and some looting took place.

While I sat on the roof, two carloads of people who didn't fit in the neighborhood pulled up and stopped in the street in front of my parent's home. A few of them got out of the car. I looked around and didn't see any Los Angeles County Sheriff's deputies. They were busy trying to contain the riot east of Crenshaw. I figured if anything started it was just me with my puny .22 rifle. Fortunately the occupants of the two cars decided to drive on.

I have always had a firearm within easy reach since the Watts riot.
 
don't trust the government? Who woulda thunk it? Couldn't have been the framers of the Constitution?
 
The entire concept behind our form of government is that of mistrust of central government. That is why it is so inefficient.

Checks and balances is a marvelous concept and really ought to be thumped in public.

Efficiency = bad
Checks and balances = good

Citizen ownership of guns = the final check on an out of control central government.

Sorry is that offends someone's PC theology.
 
"In fact, they suggest that gun control laws may have exactly the opposite effect: "To mandate decreased gun ownership through gun control legislation may only encourage those people who have little faith in the government to stockpile weapons," they claim in the latest issue of Social Science Quarterly."


"If a policy goal of the federal government is to decrease gun ownership among the general population, then our results suggest that increasing trust in government ought to be an equally important goal," Jiobu and Curry wrote."


Good study. Evidently someone needs to point out the obvious to academics and politicians. I hope it finds it's way to a lot of both.
 
I own guns because they remove me from the realm of coercion.

Anyone who wants something from me will have to use logic and reason in order to get my voluntary cooperation, because I cannot be forced into compliance.
 
They also found that those who mistrusted all branches of the federal government were significantly more likely to own a gun (37 percent) than those who trusted all three (23 percent) -- a finding that remained strong even after they controlled for relevant variables such as political ideology, gender, age, education, general fear of crime, whether the respondents had been crime victims in the previous year, whether they or someone in their household hunted, what region of the country they lived in and whether they lived in a city, in the suburbs or in a rural area.

Why is it necessary for "controlled for relevant variables"? Seems they are implying that gun owners distrusting the government are a separate group from those owning guns for all other reasons.

What the data is saying is that 77% of ALL gun owners distrust at least one branch of the federal government regardless of any other reason for owning firearms.
 
"If a policy goal of the federal government is to decrease gun ownership among the general population, then our results suggest that increasing trust in government ought to be an equally important goal," Jiobu and Curry wrote.
Which is to say that a government that wants to control guns needs to also want to increase trust in it.

There's something mighty perverse about that.... :rolleyes:

The government should increase ITS trust in the citizens in order for them to increase their trust in it.
 
I dare say that's not news to me

I've got about 10 times more "hicapacity" magazines now than before they enacted the ban. If the ban doesn't sunset I'll probably double that and get a few more firearms as well.

Purchased my first military style firearm well before the ban (1987) when "they" merely began discussing the possibility. I'm just getting warmed up here. :D

Overly restrictive laws are oppressive laws. If it is going to end up in an us-vs-them situation who wouldn't want to be prepared? A buddy of mine isn't, he told me yesterday that if the SHTF he's heading for my place. Allies are a good thing.

Micro-manage this! :fire:



(edit: darn typos)
 
Bill Clinton hit the daily double. He was responsible for putting more guns in the hands of citizens than any other President AND he proved that the Executive branch was untrustworthy, all in one fell swoop. I'd say this study confirms that.
 
Its funny though. How many people got into firearms for other reasons. I didn't trust the gov't before I owned a gun. Now that I own one, I don't trust them any more or any less. Now I have better and more clarified reasons to not trust the gov't, and it has something to do with my owning of a firearm, but also because of recent legislative attacks on our personal freedoms. What I did also gain is a better understanding of the RKBA, and a firmer belief in the Constitution, most notably the BoR since I found TFL and now here on THR.
 
Unchallenged underlying issue:

...If a policy goal of the federal government is to decrease gun ownership among the general population...

Since when is this a legitimate perogative of government?


Gun ownership is a perogative of the people, and, short of issues of actual, bona fide criminality, it is simply not part of their bailiwick.

At least, that's how the Framers envisioned it.


Gah.

Feh.

Hawk. Spit.

I feel better now.
 
Just think of all the guns that would have been purchased if Al Gore happened to get into office.

I buy guns because I'd hate to end up like a country with a centralized government like North Korea. Oh yeah, and because I can!
 
------------------------------------------------
Well, duh. How many people do you know who went out and bought an eeeeevil black 'assault rifle' just cuz the gov't was about to pass a new law?
-------------------------------------------------

So THAT'S how that funny black (sorta grey, actually) gun got in my safe with all those WW2 collectables!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top