xxjumbojimboxx
Member
+1 sam,Or, be emboldened by the fact that those things are non-lethal, so their life isn't on the line, and you'd still be in real deep crap if you used one without a very serious direct threat of violence impending. Heck, there are plenty of folks who would see that as a potential cash cow.
Potential cash flow.
I grew up with a mom who would sue poeple at the drop of a hat...
Not that im proud of that or anything.
She won like 75 percent of the cases, and she still does it today. Some of them for very big money.
You would think a judge would see a person like that and think, okay, thats enough. But they dont. And ill tell you this. If you tazed my mom on your property. For touching a canoe.. She'd have you selling that property and giving her half... If you dont believe that to be true then you're a fool, and dont understand the judicial system. You may understand the law, as it pertains, but what actually happens in courtrooms is a whole other ballgame.. Believe me ive seen it.