• You are using the old High Contrast theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

Why only the Soviet type scopes have the rubber eyepiece?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Caseless

Member
Joined
May 18, 2003
Messages
207
Location
PRC
It seems like the perfect solution for maintaining proper eye relief. Did U.S. or European optics manufacturer ever make these extended eyepiece?

pso4_chad_med.jpg
 
They are offered on other optics (IOR makes a few with it IIRC), but typically only for NV (because it is needed in this application). Honestly I think they are more aggravating and uncomfortable than helpful.

:)
 
I've never tried a scope with a rubber eyepiece. It strikes me as being distracting, though. Anybody tried one before?
 
WWI era Warner-Swaseys had a rubber eye cup. I believe there was some issue with the rubber not maintaining its elasticity? err...rubberiness? :D over time. But yeah, it's been done before, but isn't terribly common. One plus is that it reduces exponentially the amount of light being gathered by that eye that isn't coming through the scope. Conversely, it eliminates any peripheral vision.
 
Someone used to sell these aftermarket, I want to say "Tactical Tailor" ...

Anyone else know who sells them now?
Or how to make one...
 
The scope that came with my PSL has one. I've shot with and without it. Doesn't make much difference for me either way. Typically, I use it just for the novelty since Western scopes don't have one.
 
If you like the sensation of having your eye pushed on with every shot then I guess they're great.
 
Not my bag, but if you like them, but a few and modify them to fit other scopes ;-)
 
the brit "SUIT" and/or "Trilux" came with them....

http://www.entreprise.com/T01L2a2.htm

but, considering that the scope sports external windage and elevation adjustments, a two step external BDC cam, a tritium illuminated clear glass inverted "post" type reticle (aiming "icicle" hanging from the top), and has a scope body based on half of a binocular...

the rubber eyepiece doesn't really seem that odd on it!

gunnie
 
Last edited:
I have to say that I am a bit fond of the SUIT, it would be a "must-have" if I ever bought a FAL.

:)
 
Regarding several comments about glasses. I wear glasses (nearsighted, so they are a must for shooting open sights!) but often remove them while using a scope. This isn't normal?

I would like a rubber eyepiece for my scopes for the same reasons mentioned above: consistent eye placement and eliminating glare. I can understand why a hunter might not like them due to losing peripheral vision, but for their intended purpose (sniper/marksmanship) it seems that wouldn't be a huge issue.
 
Maverick223,

+1, hence my familiarity with the optic. a nice aspect of its unusual shape is the ability to mount a light on the rail unused ahead of the scope. the picatinny adapter raises the scope very little. it is also very easy to replace the tritium capsules in the on-off turret.

gunnie
 
Last edited:
You can get eye shades for American style telescopes
http://www.brownells.com/.aspx/pid=7786/Product/SOFT_EYE
So these are the reasons provided by the manufacturer of this accessory.
"Improves concentration on the target and relieves eyestrain by eliminating glare and view of peripheral movement. Quickly positions the eye in proper relation to the optic center line for improved sighting accuracy."
It even comes in a downward sloped version.
http://www.dvorakinstruments.com/
I am impressed. Onmilo, thanks for the info.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top