Will lever action rifles become the new AR's?

Does that only apply to the 2A?
Is it also a bit of folly to think the voice of "basic people" can stand up against an increasingly large and technological federal government?

[SIZE=4][B][URL='https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?members/corpral_agarn.195091/']Corpral_Agarn[/URL] said:
[/B][/SIZE]
I used to think this too. These days, I'm not so sure.
Hopefully we will never have to find out.

As I said, my post was my opinion...but I just don't see "US Citizens fighting against US Military" a thing that is going to happen....and if it does,...it won't be a country you'll want to live in. I hope it never happens.
 
It seems to me that one of the big advantages the AR has over most other semi auto designs is the front locking bolt, like a modern bolt action. The slop inherent in a bolt that locks at the rear puts AKs and traditional lever actions like the M92 or 336 at a disadvantage accuracy wise. There may be some oddball lever that has a rotating bolt that locks at the front, but I am not aware of it.

The rise in popularity of the AR is likely attributable in some part to the accuracy. It can fill a wide variety of roles because it can be light and compact, yet still capable of longer range accuracy. As much as I enjoy my lever actions, they will never compete with my bolt actions or AR pattern rifles once the target starts getting further away.

Also, the AR excels at modularity, allowing the user to make it their own depending on the use, etc. The lever action is about the least "modular" rifle out there. Even putting a scope on some models is a challenge to do well.
 
I don't think they will become the new AR but in states like mine that ban sales I think lever action sales will increase. Hopefully the new ban is thrown out but it might be a few years.
 
“They come to our village and they Take our Corn”.

In this case, yes.;)

If we were Not in Oxford England right now, I would be able to Copy/Paste images of Steve McQueen and Yul Brynner, for the imaginitive.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps the best answer comes from looking back at history. Lever guns once were the "ARs" of their time in terms of popularity. Semi-autos, particularly ARs haven't been all that popular until more recent times. I'm not all that old, and I lived to see semi-autos become a thing.

Lever guns have already been there and done that. There is a clue of what might happen in the very highly unlikely event that semi-autos like AKs and ARs are ever outlawed.
 
Too many people have missed the premise of the OP's question, and should go back, read it again, and then edit their answers. And who knows? Out here in the wild wild west of the Interweb, the OP may have missed the premise of his own question. He might want to go back and read it again. See if it could be worded better.
 
When the political climate brings pressure it causes one to consider buying what may not be available in the near future……..

What do you think?

I think if they ever manage to get (ban) the most common and popular rifle in the US the others want be be far behind, at all.
Therefore, I think one shouldn’t really consider possible future political climates/consequences and should simply buy what they want.

But thats just me. If someone wants to buy something to “hedge” against some potential scenario, then that’s what they should do. However futile I believe it to be.
 
Personally, I think the notion of "defending against a tyrannical government" would be an extremely rare thing anymore....and even if it did happen, the odds of basic people being able to stand up against an increasingly technological military is a bit folly. That's just my opinion, of course.

As for "levers being the new AR's,...unlikely. I have an AR-15. I have a Uberti 357 Winchester clone. I much prefer the Uberti...and personally like the appearance of it much more. Again...just my opinion.

This government would be in a world of hurt if the constitution abiding citizens coalesced and formed a resistance against tyranny.

Remember the government doesn’t create anything the people do. Insurgency tactics are a real thing, a government inflicting self-pain on its infrastructure to quell its citizenry with what little law enforcement, military, etc that follows its tyrannical orders will have its work cut out.

The main problem that is difficult is the death by a thousand cuts, they are taking bites out of our freedoms, painting us into a corner day by day. If the American patriot continues to allow this for the foreseeable future that is where our abilities to mount a resistance to tyranny start to become more difficult.

It’s all the people who look at the current government in the lens of, well we have it better than most countries, or the government telling me I can or can’t do this or that is no big deal is the problem.

We need to get back to looking at our unalienable rights, endowed by not the government but our Creator. Until we all look back and see how far we’ve come on the road of tyranny from our founding and not in comparison to the other countries in tyranny, and do something about it; than the American experiment is finished.
 
It seems to me that one of the big advantages the AR has over most other semi auto designs is the front locking bolt, like a modern bolt action. The slop inherent in a bolt that locks at the rear puts AKs and traditional lever actions like the M92 or 336 at a disadvantage accuracy wise. There may be some oddball lever that has a rotating bolt that locks at the front, but I am not aware of it.

Ummm…AK’s do lock towards the front of the bolt, not much behind an AR.
 
They were the “ARs” up until the early 20th century.
I’m keeping mine as it looks like my days of having one in Illinois are numbered.
 
I April I bought three Rossi R92s and one PSA AK. However,
Personally, I think the notion of "defending against a tyrannical government" would be an extremely rare thing anymore....and even if it did happen, the odds of basic people being able to stand up against an increasingly technological military is a bit folly. That's just my opinion, of course.

As for "levers being the new AR's,...unlikely. I have an AR-15. I have a Uberti 357 Winchester clone. I much prefer the Uberti...and personally like the appearance of it much more. Again...just my opinion.

I dunno. We seem to have problems with rice farmers and goat herders.
 
I have been tempted of late to throw a lot of money into buying an AK. The 7.62x39 is a nice round but I am heavily invested in .233/5.56.

I do have a Marlin 45c in a nice lever action rifle.

When the political climate brings pressure it causes one to consider buying what may not be available in the near future.

I am wondering if the Marlin will "fill in" in place of the semi-auto. It can hold 10 rounds, fires off a reasonable caliber fairly rapidly and with great reliability. It is relatively lightweight and handles well.

What do you think?

There's a whole industry of folks making parts to make your lever action tacti-cool. It's not my cup o' tea but maybe some of it is practical for some applications.

https://www.pinterest.com/mike4087/lever-action/
 
The simple fact is that the anti gun crowd will never be satisfied until no one has a gun but the government. ARs now, levers next, and right on down to the last single shot and that will be the end gate of any though of freedom in this country. Look up photos of East Germany when the wall fell to see how you will be living.
 
Why not? I say both reasons are good reasons. Any reason is suitable for a new gun.

Depends on a person's situation, right?

If I was a new shooter with no long guns, money for only one gun, and I wasn't a hunter, I'd pick what I think may become unobtainium first. This thread implies that the lever gun will be around for civilian purchase long after a detachable magazine semi-auto rifle would be.
 
The simple fact is that the anti gun crowd will never be satisfied until no one has a gun but the government. ARs now, levers next, and right on down to the last single shot and that will be the end gate of any though of freedom in this country. Look up photos of East Germany when the wall fell to see how you will be living.

Unfortunately for all of us this guy knows what he's talking about. I agree 100%
 
"Multi caliber" lower receivers are the new AR. It's not an assault weapon. It's not even a semi automatic. It's not even a rifle.
 
Personally, I think the notion of "defending against a tyrannical government" would be an extremely rare thing anymore....and even if it did happen, the odds of basic people being able to stand up against an increasingly technological military is a bit folly. That's just my opinion, of course.
It’s both a wise and correct opinion.

As to the OP – there’s no political will in Washington for a new AWB.

And state level bans will likely be overturned by the end of this decade.

Continue to buy and enjoy AKs and ARs; buy a lever action because you want one.
 
My opinion is it does not matter what gun you have, even single shots and muzzle loaders. They are all at risk from the left.

If you want to shoot a lever gun for some reason, go ahead and buy one. But, there is no guarantee you will be able to keep it legally anymore than any other firearm.
 
Back
Top