"Witnessing Violence Can Trigger Violent Behavior"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Harry Tuttle

Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2003
Messages
3,093
Witnessing Violence Can Trigger Violent Behavior
Teens exposed to gun violence more likely to commit violence themselves, researcher claims.

By Serena Gordon
HealthDay Reporter
http://www.healthcentral.com/newsdetail/408/525957.html

THURSDAY, May 26 (HealthDay News) -- Can exposure to gun violence make you more likely to participate in violence?


The answer is yes, according to new research that found teens who had witnessed gun violence or been victims of it were twice as likely to then commit violence.


"This study makes us more confident that there is a substantial cause-and-effect relationship between being exposed to violence and perpetrating violence," said study author Jeffrey Bingenheimer, a doctoral candidate at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. "Violence can be socially transmitted from person to person in a community through exposure."


The study, published in the May 27 issue of Science, is believed to be the first one to show a cause-and-effect relationship between exposure to violence and committing violence.


To reach that conclusion, Bingenheimer and his colleagues analyzed data from the large, longitudinal Chicago Neighborhoods study, which includes about 6,000 children from 78 different Chicago neighborhoods.


The researchers began with a group of about 1,500 children who were either 12 or 15 at the start of the study. The researchers took a comprehensive assessment of family history, home and community environment, health, social support, peer influences, school proficiency, previous exposure to violence and more. Both the adolescents and their primary caregiver -- usually their mother -- provided information for the initial assessment.


A second assessment, which took place about two years later, included 1,239 youngsters from the original group. Study volunteers were asked about their exposure to gun violence: 942 said they hadn't been exposed to gun violence; 283 said they had.


There were many differences between the exposed and unexposed groups, according to the study. Teens exposed to gun violence were more likely to be male, from single-parent households, nonwhite and to be on public assistance. According to the researchers, those teens were also more likely to use drugs or alcohol, to be truant from school, to commit property crimes, to have family members with criminal problems and to have witnessed domestic violence in their homes.


The third and final assessment took place almost three years after the second, and the researchers were able to get 984 of the original study volunteers to participate.


They found that most -- 856 -- hadn't become perpetrators of violent crime. But, 122 (12 percent) had become perpetrators. That meant they had carried a hidden weapon, attacked someone with a weapon, shot at someone, or been in a gang fight.


Before controlling for background characteristics, the researchers found a fourfold increase in the chance that someone exposed to violence would become violent themselves.


But, the researchers wanted to control for background factors, such as home and community environment, to see if there truly was a cause-and-effect relationship between exposure to violence and committing violent acts.


Using a special statistical technique called propensity stratification, the researchers used the information on more than 150 characteristics gathered in the first assessment to determine the probability of gun violence exposure, which allowed them to compare those with a high probability of exposure to those who were actually exposed.


After adjusting for these factors, the researchers found that those actually exposed to gun violence were two times more likely to become perpetrators of violence.


While this study wasn't designed to look at the reasons why someone exposed to violence might later become violent in turn, Bingenheimer said that those who have been exposed to violence may be more likely to assume that someone is going to hostile, which "may lead to more preemptive aggressive behaviors."


"When individuals have such traumatic experiences -- witnessing or being exposed to gun violence -- it makes you hypervigilant," added Daniel W. Webster, co-director of the Center for Gun Policy and Research at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore.


"There are often social stimuli that are ambiguous -- like at a crowded party, someone bumps into you. How do you interpret those stimuli? Most people think, 'It's crowded, it was an accident.' But, youth [who have been exposed to violence] may immediately assume a hostile intent and think someone is trying to challenge them, which can lead to violence, including gun violence," Webster said.


"Guns add a unique dimension to violence, because it's difficult to defend oneself against a gun," Webster added. "Young people, perhaps rightly, perceive that guns are ubiquitous in our society and there's this constant risk of being shot. That has enormous psychological costs."


The study, he said, points to the need for mental health services for those who witness gun violence, as well as additional social support services to help counteract chaotic family lives and problems in school.


More information


To learn more about risk factors for youth violence, as well as protective factors, go to the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (www.cdc.gov ).


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

May 26, 2005


Exposure to Gun Violence Increases Teen Violence
http://crime.about.com/b/a/172878.htm

Exposure to gun violence makes adolescents twice as likely to perpetrate serious violence in the next two years, according to a University of Michigan study. Researchers found there is a substantial cause and effect relationship between exposure and perpetration of violence.

Jeffrey B. Bingenheimer, a doctoral student in health behavior and health education, analyzed five years of data from adolescents living in 78 neighborhoods in Chicago. Bingenheimer is lead author on a paper in this week's journal Science.

Using a statistical method called propensity stratification, Bingenheimer and coauthors Robert Brennan and Felton Earls aimed to establish a firm cause and effect relationship between exposure to gun violence and later perpetrating violence.

"We wanted to know whether these just tend to occur in the same populations or if one actually caused the other," Bingenheimer said. "These findings suggest there is a substantial cause and effect relationship between exposure and perpetration. Violence can be transmitted from person to person by means of exposure in the community."

Bingenheimer used data from the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods, a longitudinal study that conducted extensive interviews with more than 6,000 young people and their primary care givers on everything from reading proficiency to family members with legal problems to delinquency in their peer groups. Bingenheimer used data from about 1,500 adolescents who were within six months of their 12th or 15th birthday at the time of their first interview.

The project is based at Harvard University, with involvement from Columbia University, Emory University, Johns Hopkins, and Pennsylvania State University, among others. Brennan and Earls are faculty members at Harvard.

Propensity Stratification

Bingenheimer said many researchers have looked at how violence begets violence. His use of the complex statistical approaches he learned from Raudenbush help make this paper unique.

While many investigations, such as clinical trials of new drugs, use randomized experiments to test effects, that is not possible in a real-life situation like examining the effects of gun violence. So instead they looked at information provided in questionnaires and used propensity stratification to simulate randomization as best they could.

Overall, Bingenheimer found that adolescents who were exposed to firearm violence were nearly four times as likely as unexposed adolescents to perpetrate violence over the next two years.

Elevated Rates of Violence

But exposed and unexposed adolescents differed on a wide range of demographic, socioeconomic, temperamental and other factors. These differences, rather than gun violence exposure itself, could account for the elevated rates of violence among exposed adolescents. Propensity stratification allowed Bingenheimer to control for the effects of more than 150 characteristics of the adolescents, their families and their neighborhoods.

Propensity stratification combines these variables into a single number, the predicted probability of being exposed to gun violence. If the association between actual exposure and perpetration persists among adolescents who had similar predicted probabilities of exposure, this is evidence of a cause and effect relationship, Bingenheimer said.

The study defined exposure to firearm violence as having been shot or shot at or seeing someone shot or shot at. It defined perpetrating violence as carrying a hidden weapon, attacking someone with a weapon, shooting someone, shooting at someone, or being in a gang fight.

Source: University of Michigan
>>>>


http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-05/uom-etg052505.php
 
They found that most -- 856 -- hadn't become perpetrators of violent crime. But, 122 (12 percent) had become perpetrators. That meant they had carried a hidden weapon, attacked someone with a weapon, shot at someone, or been in a gang fight.

This research is just plain DUMB!!! According to the above citation (relevant portion in bold print), I'm a "perpetrator"... I was the victim of violence, and thereafter chose to carry a weapon to ensure that next time, I wouldn't be the victim!

:fire:
 
This study makes us more confident that there is a substantial cause-and-effect relationship between being exposed to violence and perpetrating violence," said study author Jeffrey Bingenheimer, a doctoral candidate at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. "Violence can be socially transmitted from person to person in a community through exposure

Golly, imagine that. People watch things, then do it themselves. Used to be we'd call that "learning".... :rolleyes:

Perhaps I'll seek my doctoral degree by doing a follow up study that investigates kids that have been exposed to guns, but NOT violence. Anybody care to guess my results?
 
"Violence can be socially transmitted from person to person in a community through exposure."

Um, wouldn't this make all combat vets prone to go about the countryside randomly killing? You guys have seen more violence than anyone. This "research" is bull...erm...droppings.
 
My Dad joined the Marines in 1941 when he was almost 15...believe it or not. His MOS was "machine gunner". He participated in every major campaign in the Pacific and was wounded on Iwo Jima. I think it's safe to say that, as a teenager, he witnessed a lot of violence. He was also mobilized from the reserves in '51 and was at the Chosin Reservior...lots of violence taking place there, too.

He didn't have any anti-social or violent tendencies. I don't think he was ever in a fight after his period in the service. He didn't own any handguns, let alone carry concealed.

Reading this guy's thesis, my Dad should have been a mass murderer!
 
"Teens exposed to gun violence were more likely to be male, from single-parent households, nonwhite and to be on public assistance. . . have family members with criminal problems and to have witnessed domestic violence in their homes."

I'm sure this had nothing to do with it. That damn gun made me do it.
 
Makes sense to me. After watching "Pulp Fiction", I went out and bought a felt tip pen and 5 epinephrine needles and stabbed people in the heart with them. You should have seen the look on their faces. :neener:
 
i think it's kinda weak to tie guns into this. the real issue is the violence, and the end result, the "why did you bump into me" mentality.

guns are a secondary part of this nonsense, they have almost nothing to do with it.
 
Sounds like this is an attempted expansion of the Bandura BoBo doll experiment, but somewhat updated and less controlled. I think the big difference between war vets and people who have been victims of violence and kids is that the war vets and VoV's that we've been or been around are probably adults and more able to distinguish appropriate from inappropriate. Kids, on the other hand, have to be taught what is and isn't appropriate. Based on some of the assertions it sounds like kids who are less likely to have someone teach them right from wrong, who witness violence, are more likely to be violent. No big shocker there.

Agreed that carrying a weapon is hardly an act of violence, and I'd like to see how the study turned out with that retracted.
 
Peter - do you reckon all us carriers could organize a nice lil' ''violence party'' - ya know, lots of beer and a mammoth shoot-out?? Get rid of all our pent up aggression??

I mean - we carry - therefore we are ''tainted''. ;)
 
The most amazing part of this drivel is that somebody paid Serena to write it.
"...usually their mother..." It's not watching violence or the firearm. It's their single parent mommy's making them crazy. Funny how it didn't effect me.
"...Chicago neighborhoods..." You don't suppose the current idiocy going on in Illinois has anything to do with it? Tell a kid he can't do something and he'll be after it in seconds.
 
This sort of thinking extends beyond the Ivory Towers into the real world.

Several years back, a teenage girl shot and killed another girl for her coat. Her attorney made up an Urban Stress Syndrome defense, meaning that the girl had been exposed to violence all her life.

The jury laughed it off, but the case was appealed, and the appellate judge bought the defense. The girl got off.
 
This study makes us more confident that there is a substantial cause-and-effect relationship between being exposed to violence and perpetrating violence...

Yeah, and people who go to the beach are more likely to end up with sand in their shoes than people who don't, too.

Violence begets violence. The sky is blue. The sun rises in the east. This is news?
 
"According to new research teens who had witnessed gun violence or been victims of it were twice as likely to then commit violence."


In other words this is their premise: If a teen gets shot at, he's more likely to shoot back or take revenge later than one who was not.

I wish I thought of that. :banghead:
 
Yeah. Remember all those returning WWII vets who became mass murderers, and what a big problem it was in the late 40's and into the 50's?

I thought not.
 
Witnessing Violence Can Trigger Violent Behavior
Teens exposed to gun violence more likely to commit violence themselves, researcher claims.

I've been around guns a very long time. I've never seen a gun do a violent thing. Nope, never happened.

The fact that this "suedo study" took place in the most violent disarmed city in Illinois and had as it subjects ("Teens exposed to gun violence were more likely to be male, from single-parent households, nonwhite and to be on public assistance. . . have family members with criminal problems and to have witnessed domestic violence in their homes." ) had everything to do with it.
Had this "study" been done in say Phoenix, AZ with reasonable cross section of the kids in the valley, there would have been a totally different result.

The study was rigged from the start to get a specific result.

Joe
 
I'm not surprised- this is a PHD study- these clowns come up with the strangest stuff imaginable- go to any university commencement that has doctoral programs- you will receive a playbill of sorts that lists that function's schedule- among other things usually listed are the titles of the doctoral disertations of the PHD graduates- it boggles the mind what these so called educated people dream up- this stuff always reminds me of the opening scene of "Animal House"- as the camera shows the statue of Dr Faber, the college's namesake, it pans down to the inscription which reads, "Knowledge is Good"- :neener:
 
I disagree, viewing violance doesnt equal violant behavior. as mentioned, the returning vets,numerous kids that grew up watching westerns..its all in what one persons sees as right vs wrong...real vs made-up...and the percieved reactions and learning that comes from it.



I have several friends that served in viet nam, theyve seen enough and carry memories of ALOT of things that happened, 1 wont even pick up a gun to go target shooting anymore.so to say being exposed to violance triggers violance is baloney hogwash. It affects everyone differently.


some run from it,some ignore it and some see it and just shrug their shoulders and walk away.
 
While many investigations, such as clinical trials of new drugs, use randomized experiments to test effects, that is not possible in a real-life situation like examining the effects of gun violence. So instead they looked at information provided in questionnaires and used propensity stratification to simulate randomization as best they could.

Translation: We couldn't figure out how to manage all of the variables, so we made up a method of achieving the desired results.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/t...002-4153116-6342426?v=glance&s=books&n=507846
 
If witnessing violence or it's aftermath could make one violent - I should have cooked off along time ago. As for this study they should study harder . One of the gentelest ,kindest man I have ever met fought his way the Pacific in WWII.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top