WND: Iran declares war on U.S.

Status
Not open for further replies.
G

Gary H

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
1,372
Location
Texas
Interesting... maybe even probable..

"Nobody else is saying it, so, once again, it is left to me to explain what really happened in Iraq yesterday.

Iran declared war on the U.S.

The signs have been there for a long time. I don't know if they have been intentionally ignored by U.S. forces in Iraq, or whether there is some master plan at the Defense Department to deal with this scenario.

All I can tell you is we are now fighting a regional war. Our local opposition in Iraq is being trained, armed and directed with foreign support – by neighboring Iran.

The uprising yesterday was treated in many initial news accounts as a spontaneous uprising directed by Najaf cleric Moktada al-Sadr.

What the other news accounts left out was one significant, but well-established fact: Al-Sadr works for Iran. He is an Iranian agent. His authority comes from Iran.

Last April, an Iranian cleric, Kadhem al-Husseini al-Haeri, issued a religious edict and distributed to Shiite mullahs in Iraq, calling on them "to seize the first possible opportunity to fill the power vacuum in the administration of Iraqi cities."

The edict, or fatwa, issued April 8, 2003, showed that Shiite clerics in Iraq are receiving significant direction from Iran. The edict said that Shiite leaders have to "seize as many positions as possible to impose a fait accompli for any coming government."

"People have to be taught not to collapse morally before the means used by the Great Satan if it stays in Iraq," the fatwa read. "It will try to spread moral decay, incite lust by allowing easy access to stimulating satellite channels and spread debauchery to weaken people's faith."

The fatwa also instructed the cleric's followers to "raise people's awareness of the Great Satan's plans and of the means to abort them."

On April 7, the day American troops effectively toppled Hussein's government by seizing its main seats of power in Baghdad, al-Haeri sent a handwritten letter to the city of Najaf, appointing Moktada al-Sadr as his deputy in Iraq.

Haeri wrote: "We hereby inform you that Mr. Moktada al-Sadr is our deputy and representative in all fatwa affairs."

It added: "His position is my position."

Also last April, WorldNetDaily reported that Iran had armed and trained some 40,000 Shiite Iraqi fighters – most former prisoners of war captured during the Iran-Iraq war – and sent them to Iraq to foment an Islamic revolution. The report originated in my premium, online, intelligence newsletter G2 Bulletin.

The report said this small army represents the vanguard of Iran's effort to subvert the U.S.-led liberation of Iraq and use the toppling of Saddam Hussein's regime for its own ends.

"Ayatollah Mohammed Bakir Khakim is on record pledging more than once to his followers a plan to impose Islamic rule over Iraq with the help of Iran," reports G2 Bulletin. "The Tehran ayatollahs, or the Pasadran, the powerful revolutionary guard, repeatedly have been telling the Iraqis they would be their legitimate allies and partners. In such a scenario, there is no room for the U.S. The coalition that liberated Iraq is seen by the Iraqi Shiite militants and their Iranian sponsors as a tool for handing Iraq over to them without the need to use a massive force of their own."

Iran has clear objectives in Iraq. The only question is whether the United States still has clear objectives in Iraq – and whether Washington recognizes that this war front just got wider."

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=37883
 
OPERATION: IRAQI FREEDOM
Iran fueling
Iraqi rebels
Arab media report training,
$70 million given monthly

"Reports in the Arabic media reveal the role of Iran in the current unrest in Iraq initiated by radical Shiite cleric Moqtada Al-Sadr and his followers.

On Tuesday, the London Arabic daily Al-Hayat noted in the previous two days there had been "repeated talk in the Governing Council of Iraq about the major Iranian role in the events that took place in the Iraqi Shiite cities," according to the Washington, D.C.-based Middle East Media Research Institute, or MEMRI.

"The direct Iranian presence in the Shiite areas of Iraq in the political, security, and economic affairs can not be ignored anymore," the paper said.

"This presence is accompanied by a vigorous Iranian effort to create bridges with different forces in Iraq; first, by material and logistic aid to parties other than the Shi'a, and secondly through the traditional Iranian influence in the religious seminaries [hawza] and in the Marja'iya [religious Shi'a authorities] institutions."

As WorldNetDaily reported, last April, an Iranian cleric, Kadhem al-Husseini al-Haeri, issued a religious edict distributed to Shiite mullahs in Iraq, calling on them "to seize the first possible opportunity to fill the power vacuum in the administration of Iraqi cities."

The edict, or fatwa, issued April 8, 2003, showed that Shiite clerics in Iraq are receiving significant direction from Iran. The edict said Shiite leaders have to "seize as many positions as possible to impose a fait accompli for any coming government."

Also last April, WorldNetDaily reported Iran had armed and trained some 40,000 Shiite Iraqi fighters – most former prisoners of war captured during the Iran-Iraq war – and sent them to Iraq to foment an Islamic revolution.

The report from Al-Hayat this week quoted a member of the Governing Council saying the Iranians recently have managed to activate a known Marja', a Shi'a cleric regarded as a religious authority, Kazem Al-Ha'iri.

The cleric lives in Iran's holy city of Qum and is known to be close to Al-Sadr's movement.

The London paper cited "Iraqi security sources as saying the recent escalation of violence erupted after an American decision to oust Hassan Kazemi Qumi, the recently appointed chief Iranian agent in Iraq, who is an officer in the Iranian Revolutionary Guards.

The sources connected the ousting of Qumi with Al-Sadr's statements his movement is an extension of the Lebanese terrorist group Hezbollah and the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas.

"It may well be that the Iranians, who apparently have influence in more than one sphere in Iraq, have intervened to reconcile the inner Shiite struggle for power," the paper said.

"They intervened when Moqtada Al-Sadr sought to take control of the Husseini circle in Karbala, an attempt that the followers of Ayatollah Al-Sistani objected to. The Iranians worked out an arrangement under which large sums of money were sent to institutions belonging to Al-Sadr's family, which placated Al-Sadr, and satisfied him with controlling the Al-Kufa mosque only."

$70 million per month from Iran

An Iranian defector claims Iran spends $70 million a month on activity in Iraq, according to the London Arabic-Language Daily Al-Sharq Al-Awsat.

The paper quoted extensively a former Iranian intelligence official in charge of activities in Iraq, identified as Haj Sa'idi, who recently fled from Iran.

He told the paper the Iranian presence in Iraq is not limited to the Shiite cities.

"Rather," he said, "it is spread throughout Iraq, from Zakho in the north to Umm Al-Qasr in the south."

The defector said "the infiltration of Iranian Revolutionary Guards and the Al-Quds Army into Iraq began long before the war, through hundreds of Iranian intelligence agents, amongst them Iraqi refugees who were expelled by Saddam Hussein in the 1970s and 1980s to Iran, allegedly because of their Iranian origin, and who infiltrated back into Iraq through the Kurdish areas that were out of the Iraqi Baath government control."

After the war, he said, Iranian intelligence sent its agents through the uncontrolled Iraq-Iran border, some of them as students and clerics and others as belonging to the Shiite militias.

Haj Sa'idi said that the assassination last summer of Ayatollah Muhammad Baqir Al-Hakim, who headed the Supreme Council of the Islamic Revolution in Iraq, was a "successful operation carried out by the intelligence unit of the Iranian Al-Quds Army."

He also revealed to the paper a failed attempt on the life of the highest Shiite Marja', Ayatollah Ali Al-Sistani, at the Eid Al-Adha holiday last year, and that there was another plan to assassinate Ayatollah Ishaq Al-Fayadh.

Haj Sa'idi claimed some of the Iranian intelligence officers in Iraq are known to everybody, but the real threat comes from those that are unknown.

Among them are 18 Shiite charities in Kazimiya, in Al-Sadr city in Baghdad, in Karbala, Najaf, Kufa, Nasiriyah, Basra, and other cities with a large Shiite majority.

In those offices, new agents are recruited every day, under the guise of financial aid, medicine, food, and clothing for the poor, he said.

Haj Sa'idi said the Iranian plan to turn Iraq into another Iran is a wide-ranging plan, involving the recruitment of thousands of young Shiites for the next stage, which will take place with the [first] parliamentary elections in Iraq.

Those recruited now are supposed to enlist relatives to vote for candidates that will be endorsed by the Iranian intelligence apparatuses, according to the defector.

Haj Sa'idi also mentioned more than 300 reporters and technicians who are working now in Iraq for television and radio networks, newspapers, and other media agencies actually are members of the Al-Quds Army and the Revolutionary Guards intelligence units.

He also asserts Iranian money allocations for activities in Iraq, both covert and overt, reached $70 million per month.

Haj Sa'idi claimed 2,700 apartments and rooms were rented in Karbala and Najaf, in order to serve agents of the Al-Quds Army and the Revolutionary Guards.

The attempt by Kurdish authorities in northern Iraq to act against the Iranian activities there prompted a reaction by the Iranian Revolutionary Guards to incite the Turkmeni Shiites in the region against the Kurds, he said.

Many Turkmen Shiite commanders traveled to Iran and received huge financial support, as well as guarantees Iran will back them in case of clashes with the Kurds.

Training centers for "Mahdi Army"

A source in the Quds Army of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard told Al-Sharq Al-Awsat three camps and training centers are being constructed on the Iranian-Iraqi borders to train elements of the "Mahdi Army" founded by Al-Sadr.

The source estimated about 800 to 1,200 young supporters of Al-Sadr have received military training, including guerilla warfare, the production of bombs and explosives, the use of small arms, reconnoitering and espionage.

The three camps are located in Qasr Shireen, 'Ilam, and Hamid, bordering southern Iraq, which is inhabited largely by Shi'a Muslims.

The newspaper also reported the Iranian Embassy in Baghdad recently has distributed 400 satellite phones to supporters of Al-Sadr and to clerics and students at the A'thamiyya district of Baghdad, Al-Sadr City, and the holy city of Najaf, all of which are inhabited predominantly by Shi'a Muslims.

The Iranian source, known in Iraq as "Abu Hayder," confirmed the intelligence service of the Revolutionary Guard has introduced to the Shi'a cities radio and TV broadcasting facilities which are used by Al-Sadr and his supporters.

During his recent visit to Iran, Al-Sadr met with Hashemi Rafsanjani, head of the Expediency Council as well as the head of the revolutionary guard intelligence, Murtadha Radha'i, and the commander of the Al-Quds Army responsible for Iraqi affairs, Brig. General Qassim Suleimani, and other government and religious leaders.

The source estimated the financial support to Al-Sadr in recent months has exceeded $80 million, in addition to the cost of training, equipment and clothing of his supporters.

Elements of the Al-Quds Army and the Revolutionary Guard Intelligence lead many of the operations directed against the coalition forces, the source said.

These elements also are leading a campaign against the senior Shi'a clerics such as the Grand Ayatollah Ali Al-Sistani, Hussein Al-Sadr, Ishaq Al-Fayadh and others because of their opposition to the concept of "the Rule of the Jurist," which is Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini's style of government in Iran."

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=37977
 
Actually, atek3........

You may be correct.

A similar failure of will by the "progressives" in the U.S. could turn a military victory into a political defeat, as in VietNam.:eek:


Let's hope not...this war has quite a bit more justification than the one in VietNam did, IMHO.;)
 
US Troops Pull out of Major Centers as Iraqi Security Forces and Interim Government B

US Troops Pull out of Major Centers as Iraqi Security Forces and Interim Government Buckle



"On Friday, April 9 – Day Six of the Shiite radical uprising - the tide turned in the Iraq war. US-led forces in Iraq were thrown back to the point they had reached exactly one year ago when Saddam Hussein’s colossal statue was toppled by joyous Iraqis.

They were faced, according to DEBKAfile’s exclusive military and intelligence sources, with a row of devastating setbacks: ministers were quitting the provisional Iraqi Governing Council set up to hold the fort of government until the handover of sovereignty on June 30; large parts of the New Iraqi Army, police, border guard, protective units for oil installations and intelligence, trained and financed by Washington, were breaking down. Some Iraqi units were handing their weapons and surrendering to the nearest insurgent militias, whether the rebellions radical Shiite Mehdi Army or other guerrilla groups, including al Qaeda.

The third element of the picture flowed from the first two: US troops were ordered to de-escalate military action and pull back from the major fronts of Baghdad’s sprawling northern Shiite slum known as Sadr City, the northern oil city of Mosul and Ar Ramadi at the western tip of the Sunni Triangle. They were told that further coalition troop advances were bound to cause an unacceptable level of civilian and troop casualties.

This was the real background to the unilateral US suspension of hostilities on April 9 in the hotbed town of Falllujah, scene of the brutal lynching of four American contractors on March 31.

Saturday, April 10, US Brig.Gen Kimmit called on Iraqi insurgents in Fallujahto join the ceasefire declared unilaterally by US forces and negotiate a way out of the crisis. The call went unheeded as guerrillas continued to attack.

Most surprisingly, American and allied forces were stopped in their tracks not by a popular Iraqi revolution or a mighty army, but by the spotty “strike and scoot†tactics of a radical militia, the ragtag Mehdi Army led by a fringe Shiite leader, 31-year old Moqtada Sadr.

His tactics, meticulously plotted by masterminds in Iran and the Hizballah, proved capable of breaking up the military, political and economic edifice the Bush administration had created at great cost on the road to a future democracy.

The impact of the Iraqi reverses on US standing in the world and the Middle East and George W. Bush’s re-election prospects will not be long in coming. America’s allies in the region are aghast. Their leaders are witnessing a stage in the Iraq war in which US-led forces are falling back against the combined strength of terrorists and their sponsors, Iran, Hizballah, Syria, al Qaeda and Iraqi Shiite radicals. The thought has occurred to Jerusalem that this anti-American coalition may well decide to sidestep a direct military confrontation with the American army and follow up its Iraq successes with a newly invigorated military-terrorist offensive against Israel.

This sharpened threat looms at the very moment that Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon is working against all odds to sell President Bush and his own Likud Party a plan for Israel’s unilateral disengagement from the Palestinians and renunciation of all Gaza and a handful of West bank settlements. This plan would render Jewish state extremely vulnerable to enemy action, a fact that will not be lost on the winning coalition in Iraq which also sustains the extremist Hamas, or on the Palestinian terrorist movement as a whole.

Israel’s withdrawal from the Gaza Strip would be a gift to Hamas, delivering into the hands of the terrorists threatening to overrun Iraq the further gain of an open enclave, haven and base, on the Mediterranean, that would hem Israel in from the south. They would acquire this asset on top of the Lebanese and Syrian bases on its northern border where the terrorists and their Iranian backers are already poised to strike.

DEBKAfile’s military sources uncover for the first time the sequence of events unfolding in the last 48 hours that brought the US-led coalition army to its present impasse:

1. Thursday night, April 8, US forces, diverted to regain the southern town of al Kut from Sadr’s militia, rolled into the town center. They rolled out again with all speed once they saw the steady barrage directed against them could be halted only by a heavy bombardment of the streets and residential districts with resultant heavy civilian casualties.

2. Later that morning, Shiite and Sunni militias turned their guns on Al Ghraib the hub northwest of Baghdad of American supply routes from the capital to Fallujah, Ramadi and on to the Jordanian capital of Amman. Their gunmen blew up and set fire to an American fuel and food truck, causing casualties, and went on to seize the Al Ghraib semi-military airfield.

3. Conflicting statements issuing from US authorities on the state of play in Fallujah created hours of confusion on Thursday. Administrator Paul Bremer announced a unilateral suspension of military action for humanitarian aid to enter the besieged city and for Iraqi mediators to begin talks with Iraqi guerrilla chiefs; Deputy Director of Operations Brig.-Gen Mark Kimmit countered by stating fighting was continuing, while the US command ordered the troops to hold their fire. Hostilities were halted in Falluja for the same reason US forces redeployed outside al Kut and, as we shall see below, Ar Ramadi: The only way to forcibly seize control of the town centers was to mow down entire civilian populations. Already, the six-day Falluja battle had reportedly claimed 478 Iraqi lives and a civilian exodus had begun, threatening further disorder. US casualties were also climbing too fast – 45 in a week.

4. The same deadly cause-and-effect spiral caused the US command to check its military advance in Ar Ramadi, a key point on strategic route known as The Corridor between the Tharthar and Habbaniyah Lakes. Held in place, American troops had to forego their planned offensive against the mixed Shiite-Sunni forces overrunning large areas between Ar Ramadi and the southern outskirts of Kirkuk.

DEBKAfile’s military sources reveal that, several weeks ago, Mehdi Army commanders struck a deal with local Sunni and Turkomen tribal chiefs to allow several hundred secretly trained Shiite fighters to cross their lands en route from Baghdad and Samarra to points north. The militiamen have joined up with the Sunni guerrillas and al Qaeda bands. The have fetched up together outside Kirkuk. The American non-advance leaves this dangerous enclave in northern Iraq free to build up its strength – but for another factor:

5. To meet the encroaching peril, the Kurds of the north have moved military units out of Suleimaniyah and Kirkuk and redeployed them further south at the Turkoman town of Tuz Khumato. The two Kurdish leaders Jalal Talabani and Massoud Barzani have warned Washington that if Shiite and Sunni militias move any further north towards Kirkuk, the Kurdish armies will push southward and smash them - a threat that raises the dread specter of an ethnic bloodbath.

6. Friday afternoon, intelligence reached the US command that a combined Shiite-Sunni-al Qaeda attack on Mosul was in the offing. US forces were ordered to evacuate bases in the city area and barricade themselves in camps outside. The immediate result was the breakdown of Iraqi administrative and police authority in this part of northwestern Iraq. Iraqi police and security officers began surrendering to the various militias including al Qaeda and handing over the weapons distributed by the Americans. The breakdown touched off the flight of tens of thousands from the Sunni suburbs of Mosul. This exodus together with the refugees heading out of Fallujah adds up to a swelling stream of more 100,000 Iraqis moving on the highways of northern and western Iraq to escape hostilities and find safe havens.

7. US forces withdrew from Baghdad’s Sadr City suburb at the same time as they left Mosul. By Friday nightfall, the last US patrol had left the hostile suburb to the control of Sadr’s militia in the hope of stemming further bloodshed on both sides. Saturday morning, however, the Shiite militia turned their guns again on US troops in Baghdad.

8. The breakdown of the US-designed Iraqi security apparatuses in Mosul and Baghdad is catching on fast in other apparently stable parts of the country. According to DEBKAfile’s military sources, a wave of desertions is sweeping the 150,000-strong command and rank-and-file levels of the Iraqi army, border guard and police.

9. Faced with these desertions, the Iraqi Governing Council is beginning to fall apart as one minister after another abandons the government and security ship painstakingly built by Bremer. Turning on its maker, the IGC demands that the US halt its military offensive in Iraq without delay.

10. The hostage-taking campaign waged by the lawless militias is part of a campaign of terror to drive America’s allies into withdrawing their troops from Iraq, so stripping the United States of its international allied support."

http://debka.com/article.php?aid=825
 
LawDog:

Point made.

I've concluded that Debka is a public information/mis-information wing of Masaad. They are not a reliable source in that they do spin tales, but they also have some good insights.

In this case, I think it is reasonable to expect the countries most at risk to actively resist our efforts to democratize Iraq. Iran, Syria and to some extent Saudi Arabia would have a real interest in supporting chaos in Iraq. Iran has traditionally been numero uno when it came to supporting Middle Eastern terror. Why should they stop now?

I'm wondering if the high oil prices tie back to Saudi opposition to our moves in Iraq.
 
I'm wondering if the high oil prices tie back to Saudi opposition to our moves in Iraq.
Click to expand...
TAKE IT TO THE BANK !!!!

I'll give you something else to noodle over while you study your morning cornflakes. Discussions are taking place amongst OPEC, Russia, and the European Union to shift oil purchase currency from the US dollar to the European Euro. Such a move would most certainly change the dollar from the world's reserve currency to the Euro. Impact on the US would be beyond measure.

George Soros and his posse has so much as promised an October Surprise. Soros has destabilized the British Pound and destabilized governments. I would not put it past him to facilitate and participate in such a change.

You think a nuke popping off in Manhattan would hurt the US economy? A firecracker compared to the loss of status as the world's storehouse currency.
 
Actually, atek3........

You may be correct.

A similar failure of will by the "progressives" in the U.S. could turn a military victory into a political defeat, as in VietNam.


Let's hope not...this war has quite a bit more justification than the one in VietNam did, IMHO.
Click to expand...

Unlike Vietnam this time the very survival of our way of life is at stake if we lose...

Vietnam wasn't a clash of culture or religion - it was fundamentally a clash between political ideologies. The war on terror is a clash between cultures and religions and those usually end with one side or the other either destroyed or assimilated.
 
Unlike Vietnam this time the very survival of our way of life is at stake if we lose...
Click to expand...
I believe it, you believe it, lots of posters on THR believe it.

Do you really think the American public (however you want to define it) really understands it. Do you really think Americans in general view this as a Thirty Years or even a Hundred Years War? Do you really think the American public will accept the barbarity that will surely get worse on both sides. Do you really think the American public will accept the destruction of medrasas' as policy once the leadership has acted?

I personally don't the think the American public today retains the moral fiber to sustain a multi-generational knife-fight-to-the-death. I think it can with OJT, but right now I think we miss the key factor in sustaining a long, ugly fight.
 
I like Farah's take on the situation, but I like Farah's takes on most situations. I don't know why we never turned Iran into one big piece of glass years ago. I know, I know, turning it into that would killl lots of innocents, but I'm sick of these little pissant coutries like Iraq and Iran biting us on the ankles and us not kicking back...hard. I think we need to go to a more advanced "mess with the bull you get the horns" diplomacy.
 
On the job training.

If the US drilled its own oil to the maximm extent possible, the Middle East would be a greatly reduced irritant, not eliminated just reduced.

To the extent we are up to our eyeballs in middle east polities, find you local environmental nazi and the craven spineless politicans who gave then their power and give both a great big hug in thanks.
 
Waitone,

Agree with you about the feckless American public. And that's why "the public," in the end will be bypassed. Most Americans are lost in a hedonic dreamworld no less insidious than the afterlife wetdreams of the Islamists. Let us hope there will be a strong, saving remnant that understands what we're fighting for and what must be done.
 
We need to start taking a more active role in helping out those Iranians that are done with theocracy and are ready to reclaim democratic governance.
 
I believe one of the unstated reasons for invading Iraq was to open a front with Iran and Syria, two well-known terrorist countries. I'd be willing to bet we have covert forces at work in these countries as we speak. Like I've heard before; Better we fight them there than over here. I tend to agree.
 
I believe that our intent with regards to Iran is to have a peaceful change of leadership. I must say that I haven't seen much peaceful change in that area of the world.

I've noticed a number of recent posts that suggest turning certain areas into glass and suggest a general war against Moslems. These comments are a bit discouraging. You see, should we turn an area into glass, how would we protest when one of our cities evaporates? Should we fight Moslems in general, wouldn't this be the equivalent of fundamentalist Islamics fighting all Christians? Fighting all Moslems and turning sand into glass is exactly what Osama and crew hope for. This would polarize all Moslems/Arabs, or whatever group we are attacking. After all, how would we react to someone attacking us in such a way?

On the flip side, we haven't been ruthless enough in dealing with the opposition in Iraq. We did not establish our dominance and we now pay the price. I think that the left wing in this country and elsewhere has moderated our actions and this has cost us our young men and women. It may also put at risk far greater number of Iraqis. You must defeat an enemy before you declare an end to hostilies. Like daddy, like son.
 
Face it -

religion or no... if "democracy" roots in the Middle East there'll be a lot of power brokers out of a job. The mullahs or whomever who control the minds now will be hurting... they might even find themselves living in cardboard boxes in alleys. Obviously - they will not go that route without a fight - and it won't be them who do the fighting, it'll be the brainwashed.

There's tough times ahead, folks; we'd best ensure that the young among us and their progeny are up to it. We here today must look to those who are dismantling us from within and either re-educate them or vote them out. We can't afford a namby-pamby administration/congress/judiciary whether federal or state.

Of course, we could all start studying for the Quran pop quiz's and finals, but I do think that even converting to Muslim wouldn't help - first, we are Americans - so conversion wouldn't help this current generation.

Check the Sig - maybe it asks pertinent questions.

-Andy
 
What Will Bush Say??

Bush will be holding a news conference tomorrow.

Does anyone want to venture a guess as to if he will tell us what is really going on?

I want to know who we are fighting?

Who is financing the insurgents?

What are our objectives?

How will we meet our objectives?

Bush owes the American people some answers. He needs to assure the troops that they are fighting for a reason and not taking an objective and the next day giving it up. He needs to show that he will make the right choices regardless of the upcoming election.

It won't happen. I've lost my confidence that Bush will do the right thing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

H
  • Locked
A Shiite War? / WSJ 4/9/2004
Replies
1
Views
411
Preacherman
P
2
  • Locked
U.S.: Iran will infiltrate 5 Iraqi cities
Replies
2
Views
479
seeker_two
S
2
  • Locked
Iraqi Shiite Leader Calls for Gun Crackdown
Replies
0
Views
263
2dogs
2
J
  • Locked
Shiite Cleric Warns of Too Many Guns
Replies
0
Views
558
Jeff White
J
P
  • Locked
Iraq: Redefining and refocusing the war
Replies
1
Views
284
Malone LaVeigh
M
Back
Top