You respond only if you've EXPERIENCED problems, yourself.
The poll seems like an excellent idea, especially the part about only those who have experienced first had problems replying.
The question remains whether US- and Western European-made guns can shoot Wolf over extended periods without harm. Some say yes, and some say no -- and many of those answers are based, at least in part, on experience with the ammo.
Such a poll would be meaningless.
There are two separate issues.
If only people who have had problems with Wolf ammo respond, then you will find that 100% of the people in the poll have had problems with Wolf ammo, and the only question that would answer would be what type of failures among those having failures occurred most often.
There must be a denominator.
You need a column for "No problems using Wolf ammo".
(There is another issue, how many rounds were fired by those with no failures, and how many rounds were fired before a failure occurred, but let's not even go there- lets try to solve the basic flaws in this poll before we go all scientific.)
Then restrict your poll to only those who have actually fired Wolf ammo from a Western Bloc centerfire handgun.
That will solve the first problem, and establish a rate of failure for Wolf ammo. If the rate of failure is extremely high, say, 94% of those using Wolf ammo have trouble, then it's reasonable to conclude that there's a problem with Wolf ammo.
You can't get that information unless you include people who have used Wolf ammo, under the parameters of the poll, successfully. Then you can say that out of so many people who have fired Wolf ammo, this many people had failures. That's considerably different from saying "We ran a poll, and only allowed those who have experienced problems with Wolf ammo to respond. What we found was that all who responded to the poll had had problems with Wolf ammo."
This kind of restriction is only valuable if you're looking for the breakdown of the types of failures that happen with Wolf ammo. It certainly doesn't answer the question of whether Wolf ammo can be used in Western Bloc weapons for extended periods of time without harm, which is the question you state that you are interested in answering.
The second problem is to determine whether or not this rate of failure is significant relative to other ammo. This will be more difficult.
To continue our example, if Wolf has a 94% failure rate in Western Bloc centerfire handguns, that is signifcant.
Unless Winchester White Box has a failure rate of 97%, and PMC has a failure rate of 98%. Then Wolf has a good failure rate, and is fine ammo.
I'm interested in the answers. I just bought 500 rounds of .45 Wolf for my two weapons, and I'd like to know these answers.