CajunBass
Member
Easy for me. 357...It's about all I've go nowdays.
Also a good option, although I would trust a cast bullet of the proper alloy to do the same job for a lot less money.
Prehaps if you live in Australia and have water Buffalo around that your trying to shoot with your handgun.
Good point though I don’t think anyone has brought up using copper solids.
Well I’d certainly put your real world experience on the subject much higher than my purely hypothetical ramblings hahaha.And this is precisely why we started the Bovine Bash years ago, to find out what works and what doesn’t in a controlled environment. While I’ve used hardcast bullets on many game animals to include water buffalo, the inconsistency due to the material limitations has not only curbed my enthusiasm, but it has also forced me to limit their use to certain types/weights of animals.
Well I’d certainly put your real world experience on the subject much higher than my purely hypothetical ramblings hahaha.
Did you just change your profile photo to you and a water Buffalo?
Must have confused you with another member. pardon my ignorance to the Buffalo species, either way that’s a fine looking animal. What was the revolver used in the photo?No, that has been my avatar for at least a year and a half, and that is a Cape buffalo, not a water buffalo.
Perfectly understandable. I've no desire to hunt buffalo myself, but I'd love to hunt something... exotic.Sorry yea definitely we got off talking about Buffalo for some reason.
Yea I’m with you, sounds exciting for sure. Back on topic, that is the same load I’m planning on taking with me for a hog hunt im trying to make happen this spring in Alabama or Georgia.Perfectly understandable. I've no desire to hunt buffalo myself, but I'd love to hunt something... exotic.
I've never had the pleasure of firing a 329 with full power 44 Magnum loads, but I do have extensive experience with a 48 oz 44 Mag Ruger Redhawk and my 20 oz Charter with factory level 44 Specials. I've found recoil to be quite adequate in both instances. The idea of firing the Redhawk loads in a 25 oz gun sounds like the worst of both worlds and doesn't hold much appeal. I've also found that while recoil in the Redhawk is manageable, it's a lot of work actually getting decent accuracy out of it. YMMV.The 329pd is 25oz and it does kick, but it's not like it's impossible to shoot in anyway. I wouldn't want to fire 500rds of full power Magnums thru it but a couple cylinders aren't bad at all
Either are good for hogs/ black bear, I personally would choose the 180 grain LFN-GC 357 mag because of it's slightly better sectional density and higher velocity.A question about cartridge vs ft. lbs. muzzle energy. I'll use Buffalo Bore's loads, because that's what I'm looking at right now.
Buffalo Bore's "14B", a 255grn .44 Spl, Kieth style SWC-GC, @ 1000 fps, w/ 566 ft. lbs. of muzzle energy.
Buffalo Bore's "19A", a 180grn .357 Magnum, LFN-GC, @ 1400 fps, w/ 783 ft. lbs. of muzzle energy.
I have a feeling that that particular .44 Spl load would be a better load for what I'm wanting (hogs/ possible black bear), but... why ? Bigger hole, bigger meplat, what ? Or am I wrong, and would that .357 Mag load be "better" ?
yesI'm kinda lost... so... after all this discussion... will a 255 grn hard cast Keith bullet from a .44 Spl @ 1k fps still suffice as hog medicine in S. MS ?
I've never had the pleasure of firing a 329 with full power 44 Magnum loads, but I do have extensive experience with a 48 oz 44 Mag Ruger Redhawk and my 20 oz Charter with factory level 44 Specials. I've found recoil to be quite adequate in both instances. The idea of firing the Redhawk loads in a 25 oz gun sounds like the worst of both worlds and doesn't hold much appeal. I've also found that while recoil in the Redhawk is manageable, it's a lot of work actually getting decent accuracy out of it. YMMV.
I will say that the 329 with warmish 44 Special loads sounds like a very nice woods rig. I seriously considered one, but it cost $1000 more than the Charter.
the 44 special will be easier on the ears.A question about cartridge vs ft. lbs. muzzle energy. I'll use Buffalo Bore's loads, because that's what I'm looking at right now.
Buffalo Bore's "14B", a 255grn .44 Spl, Kieth style SWC-GC, @ 1000 fps, w/ 566 ft. lbs. of muzzle energy.
Buffalo Bore's "19A", a 180grn .357 Magnum, LFN-GC, @ 1400 fps, w/ 783 ft. lbs. of muzzle energy.
I have a feeling that that particular .44 Spl load would be a better load for what I'm wanting (hogs/ possible black bear), but... why ? Bigger hole, bigger meplat, what ? Or am I wrong, and would that .357 Mag load be "better" ?
Less pressure ?the 44 special will be easier on the ears.
murf
less velocity and volume of the powder gases meaning less force (pressure) applied to your eardrum. most don't hunt with ear protection. i prefer the larger caliber in this scenario.Less pressure ?