State right or not, Other citizens of the US should have the right to carry concealed in Oregon if they are permitted to in their own state.
A good number of other states have no problem with the Oregon CHL. We recognize NO other state's card, and require you to get an Oregon specific card to do so.
At least we seem to be issuing them in a timely fashion.
Driving is not a right, but we have no problem with out of state drivers. Why should a right ensconced in the very foundation of our nation be different?
I have no problem researching in advance the laws of the states that I might visit, and following their local ordinances regarding how, and where I may CCW, But I'm one of those odd people who actively takes responsibility for my actions
Further thought. It occurs to me that if any individual jurisdiction tries to weasel out of a successful Reciprocity act, they then create a class of citizen, that being ANY legal concealed weapon holder in just about any state short of Illinois, would then have at least legal standing to file against any such attempt as it would directly affect them, not just citizens of that state particularly.
any REAL Legal scholars see any merit in the ability to file Amicus curiae(and similar ilk) in such a way?