Did not vote, as I have had one very good experience and one very bad one.
Very good:
Taurus 66 7-shot 6" stainless, 357 Magnum. Nicely finished, and 100% reliable. Very accurate, with a nice smooth DA trigger pull (though with a bit of stacking). SA pull was almost up there with S&W. This was an excellent gun whose balance I never really got used to. Sold it for a 4" S&W 686, no regrets. It was a fine gun though.
I wish Taurus would make the 66 in 2.5" and 3" barrel lengths. It would make a fine carry gun in the tradition of the S&W K Frames, with the bonus of an extra round.
Very bad:
Taurus 94 9-shot 4" stainless, 22LR. I know some get good ones but mine was a piece of crap. The following comes from a post I made previously on THR:
My 94 had such a heavy, extra crunchy DA pull that I found it didn't make a good training aid for my other DA wheelies. Actually, the pull on mine was so bad that it was not useable. There was a massive burr on the trigger about 1/3 of the way into the pull (actually, it was more of a hitch) that usually made me throw my shots. The SA pull, in fairness, was useable. And the gun was capable of decent accuracy.
Worse, the gun would bind every 100 rounds or so at first. Note that I always eject the empties straight down to avoid lead build up under the ejector star. I tried cleaner shooting CCI Stingers. I even attempted cleaning the gun every 50 rounds. It would still bind up. The cylinder gap appeared to be in spec, so I don't think that was the problem.
So I sent it back to Taurus. After 6 weeks I got it back in the exact same condition with a note to clean it more often
. Huh? You mean like, after every cylinder full? So I had the same problems, except I noticed the gun had turned into a lead spitter. I always wear safety glasses; I was reminded why by this 94. When I heard chunks of lead bouncing off my glasses, I put the gun down and never fired it again.
---
I highly recommend the 66, and I would consider another Taurus in the future. They make a nice revolvers that unfortunately depreciate quite a bit. And lately, their customer service leaves a lot to be desired. As for the 94, I've read enough bad stuff about them that I've concluded that Taurus just has issues with that line.