ZEM Hearing Protection

Status
Not open for further replies.

Liberty Ship

Member
Joined
May 29, 2003
Messages
26
I have a pair of these and they seem to work as advertised. I was impressed actually. I can't see a down side so far, inexpensive, light weight, comfortable and they work. I keep them in my glove compartment, in case I get a chance for some impromptu shooting.
 
Hear's some good cheap hearing protection

http://cgi.ebay.com/Electronic-Hearing-Ear-Protection-Muffs-Tactical-Muff_W0QQitemZ250017695458QQihZ015QQcategoryZ73942QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

I bought a pair of these electronic hearing ear protectors for shooting. They are dirt cheap and I felt a bit like a fool for spending money on them. However, after using them I love them. They are not as high quality as the fancy stuff but they work fine. You can't throw them on the ground and stomp on them and expect them to keep going.

For the price it's one of the best shooting accessory purchases I've made. The amplified sound is terrific (it's not stereo sound so there's not really a sense of direction so I wouldn't call it a tactical solution). It beats the heck out of ordinary ear protection and I love the amplification of low db sounds.

I totally recommend this for the shooting range.

edit----

After checking out the Zem product and seeing how cheap and portable it is I too am interested in it. I still recommend the electronic product too.
 
They look like an alternative to electronic muffs and appear to be a passive reflective resonance device (I'm guessing based on the material I could find in a few minutes).

Their advantage over plugs is that they claim that you can hear normal conversations with them, but that they "deflect" high level noise away from the ear.

You wear them like ear caps on a head band. They certainly have a lower profile than standard muffs.

My problem with them is that they can only be worn by themselves. Shooters should wear muffs over plugs to get as much protection as possible. If you wear the maximum protective plugs with muffs over them you'll get an effective noise reduction rating of 35dB (we no longer just add the NRR of the 2 devices). About 4 times the protection that the ZEMs provide. This is still the case if you wear expensive electronic muffs over plugs (like I do), but with electronic muffs you can turn the volume up enough to hear normal conversations and the muffs shut down for gunfire.

d05f.JPG


thegriz,

I have 2 concerns with inexpensive electronic muffs. First, fast reacting electronics are required to shut the signal off in time to prevent damage. I'm not an electronics manufacturing expert so I don't know how expensive it is to produce the circuits and can't say if the cheap muffs perform improperly. Second, NRR testing is a very subjective thing and I question if manufacturers of cheap muffs follow the reqired protocol in the testing. They may, but I'm once again skeptical that too much of a good thing isn't. I'd love to see some third party testing of the muffs and the response times of the electronics.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for your responses. I have a problem with plugs -- small ear canals. I went out again and shot with ZEMs and just ordered a few more sets. I'm going to keep one with my trunk gun, for example. They are eazy on, eazy off, give very good protection (not excellent, but better than nothing!), and cheap enough to have a few around or lose one. And you can her while you are wearing them. Unlike muffs, you can get a good cheek weld without displacing your protection.
 
My curiosity was piqued so I decided to investigate the ZEM hearing protectors. As a health and safety professional you can get a lot of information that might not be available to the buying public and I wanted to hear what the manufacturer had to say about the product and perhaps get some information in print.

One of the owners answered the phone and was very helpful. He spent half of an hour talking to me about the business and the technology and the developer. He also offered to send out a technical literature set for me to review. I was eager to get it to read more.

On Monday a package arrived and in it was a full set of technical literature about the ZEM, the theory and the developer. A pair of the ZEM hearing protectors was included. I tried them on while reading the material in the folder.

As has been said, they were light and comfortable. They also didn't seem to cut much of the sound, but there's not a lot to block with me sitting in my office and mild office sounds drifting down the hallway. Good thing I had brought a 9mm in to go to the range at lunch so that I could get a better idea of how well they worked.

Lunch rolled around and I headed to the range and gave them a try. I must admit that I was impressed. I was focused on whether I needed to get plugs out of my car when I cranked off the first 3 rounds, but there was no nasty ringing or startle from the sound of the Remington 9mm coming out of the Commander length barrel. That being the case I focused on my shooting. No detectable difference between my normal foam plugs and the ZEMS!

I'll want to try them against plugs and NRR 20 muffs stacked on top of each other when I've got the time, but right now my preliminary opinion is that the ZEMs are as easy to wear as muffs and nearly as effective as plugs.:what: :D

I still advocate plugs and muffs together for shooting regardless of how comfortable these are.
 
Last edited:
I think I'm going to get a pair of gray ones for duck season. I guess I'll find out after the first flight of mallards whether or not they can handle a boat load of 12 ga. magnums.

John
 
HSO,

Thanks for the report! You confirm my experience. I just thought it was too good to be true. I have since purchased four pairs, one to keep in my car, for example. I have tried the smaller plugs, but they are still a little too big and hard to get in and out. (Throughout high school and college, I used live .22LR's as plugs and got a pretty good seal. Seemed to make my coach uncomforatable, though.) Zem's seem to be the solution for me.
 
LS,

The instructions that come with foam plugs are often inaddequate. You have to roll the foam plugs up to nearly 1/16th" to properly insert them. The soft "squishy" ones might make you think they'd roll up easy when compared to the yellow cylinders, but they tend to plump up before you can get them into a small ear canal and are terribly annoying as a result. Don't give up on plugs. Try getting the cheap EARs and roll them until they are just as skinny as possible before trying to put them in. I'm sitting here at my computer with a EAR yellow foam plug in the right ear and the ZWMs on and it's quieter than with just the ZEMs or just the plugs.

Now I gotta go the the range again to test the combination. Oh drat, the burden.;)
 
I ordered a pair of ZEMS a while ago and just got to try them last night. I didn't like them, I'll be using my headset still.

They are light, and intially comfortable, but after an hour or so my ears start to hurt. Earbud headphones do this to me too, so it may be me.

They block plenty of noise and seem fine to wear around gunfire, but I had two issues. The first is that I could not hear people talking any better than with ordinary ear plugs. Being able to hear speech better was one of their selling points. The second issue is that while standing and watching a shooting match or standing still target shooting they worked fine, but when I started to do any activity (moving between IPSC targets) one of the ears would usually break it's seal and suddenly become very loud.

Also not really a problem but interesting is that we got some light rain. Raindrops hitting the ZEM tubes are rather loud and distracting.
 
It would seem that the Zems would be ideal for keeping next to one's tactical response bedside shotgun. Unlike electronic muffs there would be no need to worry about batteries and finding the switch during a high stress situation.
 
ravencon said:
It would seem that the Zems would be ideal for keeping next to one's tactical response bedside shotgun. Unlike electronic muffs there would be no need to worry about batteries and finding the switch during a high stress situation.
True however in a high Stress situation you would be very likely to forget to put them on, hearing protection kind of goes low priority when the family may be in danger.
 
I'd be curious to see how well they perform while wearing a hat.

Most of my shooting is outdoors, and sunlight protection is essential. With the sound inlets for this little gizmo buried firmly inside your hat, I'm guessing that you'd hear a lot of hair rustling - maybe even hear your follicles sweating! :D - but not much in the way of conversation around you.

Maybe I'm missing something - Can the sound inlets be rotated to point behind you?
 
I just bought some of these. I've used them around saw noise and been satisfied.

I wore them down around my chin.. they worked just as well that way. Of course that way is no good for rifle shooting. Just more convenient when wearing them around the neck when not in use and puting them in one handed.
 
"Raindrops hitting the ZEM tubes are rather loud and distracting."

Thanks, you just saved me some money. The duck hunting is best in the rain.

John
 
I guess you could wear them with the band laying down across the back of your neck - solves the hat problem, but then they'd be rubbing against your rifle strap...
 
I was wearing them with a baseball hat. They fit just fine with the hat, as long as the hat is fairly well fitted to your skull they'll go over the hat no problem. A cowboy hat would have problems though. You can wear them around back too. I tried that for a few seconds and didn't notice any difference in functionality.

And there isn't a sound "inlet", the top of the tubes is closed.

A guess duck hunting in the rain would be a problem with these if you don't put them behind your head under a hat brim. When it first started to sprinkle just a little it took me a while to figure out what the noise was :) It's sort of like being in a shed with a metal roof when it's raining.

I'm keeping mine in my range bag. I figure they'll make a good loaner for a guest. I might even give them a second chance if it gets too hot for headphones.
 
First, fast reacting electronics are required to shut the signal off in time to prevent damage. I'm not an electronics manufacturing expert so I don't know how expensive it is to produce the circuits and can't say if the cheap muffs perform improperly. Second, NRR testing is a very subjective thing and I question if manufacturers of cheap muffs follow the reqired protocol in the testing.
They don't really have to shut off (although some do)--they just need to be designed so that they can't pass/amplify unsafe levels of noise. That's really easy.

The real hearing protection is provided by the surrounding muffs.
 
I love the Zem ear mufflers. I use them and have brought them into my wholesale lineup. If anyone would like them in the Gun Club/Range let me know I service many retail shops and ranges around the country. Normal resale is 40-50% off retail based on volume. www.chadstoolbox.com
 
Interesting device. I'd compare them in a similar way to the AOSafety/Peltor E-A-R plugs:

Indoor/Outdoor Range E-A-R® Plugs

ear_03.jpg


Yellow end has variable attenuation - olive end is a sealed plug. Nicest rubber you'll ever stick in your ear too.

Been using these for years and love 'em - apparently so has our Military. Same general abilities as the Zems, but not quite the dB reduction (22 vs. 26). Started using them for Trap & Skeet so I could hear calls and others talking while shooting - have since found myself using them more often for indoor shooting as well.

I bet you guys would find these just as amazing as the Zems. Get em' at any Gander Mountain or Cabelas.
 
Those look interesting, but I'd be a little worried about the max 22 rating. The chart for the zems show at certain frequncies it muffles in the high 30's.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top