Arizona_Mike
Member
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2013
- Messages
- 3,452
Looks like I would have one refund in that case.
Mike
Looks like I would have one refund in that case.
A .22 can for my 10/22, a .30 cal for my .308, and possibly a 6.5mm can for my Grendel (though I may just use a .30 cal can instead).
I won't be buying anything right away. If it passes, I figure the prices will drop within a year to a fraction of current prices due to increased manufacturing. More cans being produced = more efficient processes at a lower production cost = lower retail price.
You think demand and production will have been met by 1 year?
Not a one! Even without the $200 tax they are still way overpriced for what they are.......
Maybe an integral suppressed barrel for my Ruger MK III tactical and 10/22 takedown ... both stainless and maybe SBR the take down so it could be a 4" barrel with 6" of suppressor. When disassembled it would fit in a standard messenger bag
Hate to be the bearer of bad news, but the passing of H.P.A (or any pro-gun bill for that matter) is FAR from a certainty. You still need 60 votes in the U.S. Senate to advance legislation since Harry Reid's "Nuclear Option" only applied to judicial appointments. The only real viable way of getting these bills signed into law would be to attach them to a a spending appropriations bill and then take advantage of reconciliation, but this would be exceptionally difficult. Ofcourse, the republicans could do away with the filibuster entirely and expand the "Nuclear option", however, later on down the road when the tables are turned and Democrats regain control of the U.S. Senate, we will just have to sit still and take it while they use the same rule against us to pass an AWB or who knows what else.
Chuck Schumer basically has to sign off on any of these bills for them to have a chance at passing under the current Senate rules. So, yeah.. I wish it was this easy, but sadly it's not. I would LOVE both of these to become law.
We would need 8 Democrat "Aye's" to advance this legislation in the U.S. Senate assuming every single republican was on board.How many Democrats need to sign on to pass it? Perhaps enough would...
It would be an SBR unless the silencer was permanently attached to the barrel via an approved BATFE method (silver solder, pinning-and-welding, etc.) to make it 16" or longer.Aim1 said:If you chop off the barrel to 4" and add the suppressor as long as it has the suppressor on it it's not considered an SBR?
We would need 8 Democrat "Aye's" to advance this legislation in the U.S. Senate assuming every single republican was on board.
About the same as my chances of convincing Taylor Swift to marry me via twitter. LolI wonder what the chance of that would be?
About the same as my chances of convincing Taylor Swift to marry me via twitter. Lol
Of course it would change. Once anyone can get a silencer just like buying a rifle and regular FFL dealers can stock them, prices will drop significantly. Sure, prices won't drop right away because the current supply won't meet the initial demand increase. But once the manufacturers catch up, prices will plummet.JR24 said:Suppressors being available in my state; the thing stopping me is cost. I don't see that changing if HPA passes.