Hollywood at it again!
I know of a guy who'd love a left-hand lever action. Heck, I can see some advantages being a rightie.
Probably not, as except for loading; the 92, like the 94, is ambidextrous all the way!Would there be enough of a market?
Would there be enough of a market?
Stag Arms did some business catering to the sinister crowd, and Charter Arms still offers a snubbie that way too.
..and Charter Arms still offers a snubbie that way too.
You missed the first episode. He was a gunman in the Indian Territories. His wife died and he moved to a new area to ranch and raise his son. His past followed him. He was not always the good guy he was in the show.The premise of The Rifleman was always amusing.
Gunman? Who me? No, I'm just a peaceful rancher raising my young son.
And, I own both a left handed Stag and a Charter Arms Southpaw. I also have a left handed Randall 1911A1. All of which means I refuse to ignore firearms made for folks like me just because some righthanded dolt thinks we shouldn't have all of the same advantages that they have.Stag Arms did some business catering to the sinister crowd, and Charter Arms still offers a snubbie that way too.
The 1892 was top eject. so, no ejection port on the side. By the way, he fires more rounds than the 1892 holds. They added another shot sound to make it match the music.I know it may well be my old eyes but while I see a LH loading port I don't see an ejection port. Anyone else see similar??
The 1892 was top eject. so, no ejection port on the side. By the way, he fires more rounds than the 1892 holds. They added another shot sound to make it match the music.
RedLegRick writes:
..which would seriously mess me up, and I'm left-handed.
Ejects out the top.I know it may well be my old eyes but while I see a LH loading port I don't see an ejection port. Anyone else see similar??