Too Much Fun

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jonesy814

Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2016
Messages
1,873
Location
NW PA
A friend was in town over the weekend and had time to hit the range with me on Sunday afternoon.
He had his Glock 22 and LC9, but the star of the day was my 5 inch S&W 625-6. He kept calling it the gun you cant miss with and it did seem that way. We were mostly shooting at an 8X10, and an 11X13 steel plate at 60-75 feet and 2 round 8 inch plates at 50 feet
We did shoot some targets and here is one I shot with my 625. This is 6 shots, standing, double action at 50 feet
81B8AB68-8245-4401-BF14-D1920DF59922.jpeg

Here is the revolver we were shooting. Ammo was my 45acp, 200gr semi wadcutters

6BB752A3-40DE-4DC8-8FD4-25FA119290B5.jpeg
Beat the heck out of the big steel plate. It was freshly painted the day before
48B4B553-C452-496A-810D-BB1CF45FD783.jpeg
 
It almost looks like it is key-holing, looking at the holes it produced on that top target. Or maybe my eyes are deceiving me....
 
It looks pretty secure. Not trying to be a naysayer, but I would like to see what the targets look like stretched out a little farther.
 
It looks pretty secure. Not trying to be a naysayer, but I would like to see what the targets look like stretched out a little farther.

When I've seen pistol rounds that are truly keyholing, the gun wouldn't have gotten on that size paper at 50 feet.
 
When I've seen pistol rounds that are truly keyholing, the gun wouldn't have gotten on that size paper at 50 feet.

I've had it more pronounced farther out, but at this range it looks to me likes it's key-holing. Here is a picture of a target I shot years ago, testing bullets that were way too long. Not trying to be combative, it just doesn't look right to me.

unspecified6A3KJ2TB.jpg
 
Not trying to be combative, it just doesn't look right to me.

Oh, you're miles away from coming across as "combative" in this exchange, and I hope I'm not being combative either. I have great respect for your knowledge of revolver ballistics, and would bow to you as the master on anything close to that. I just know that I have seen guns that were unquestionably throwing unstabilized bullets, and they were all over the place at just 10-12 yards. And the holes weren't round holes with a tear on the side, either. They were all kinds of crazy shapes, and many were perfect side-profile images of the bullet.

How many bullet holes are in your photo?
 
Two I believe. I thought I had a better picture that showed the whole cylinder. I need to do some more digging. Again, I might be way off base here, but it's just nagging at me.
 
It's been a long time since I took geometry, but I'm hard pressed to imagine how you could get a beautifully, perfectly round hole for the nose of the bullet and then have part of the bullet swung out to the side for a keyhole.
 
There are a couple of things that will give results on paper that look like the round keyholed. Lack of backing is one, type of paper is another. And, of course, and actual keyhole.

I get results like that on a lot of my targets because the backer behind it, has been chewed away and there is no support behind the paper.

Ive also seen that on targets that are a basic "paper", and not the heavier target type paper most "offical" type targets are made of.

The easiest way to tell, is to push the "tear" back and look at the hole. If it is keyholing, its going to be obvious. If its not, youll see a hole that looks like it should.
 
It's been a long time since I took geometry, but I'm hard pressed to imagine how you could get a beautifully, perfectly round hole for the nose of the bullet and then have part of the bullet swung out to the side for a keyhole.

It's probably three then, but again, I need to find the bigger photo. I recently had another revolver key hole and it was more pronounced. I would still like to see the OP stretch the revolver's legs out a bit more. It's curiosity at this point!
 
Im a big fan of 45acp wheel guns
index.php


index.php
 
It almost looks like it is key-holing, looking at the holes it produced on that top target. Or maybe my eyes are deceiving me....
The cardboard backer behind the target was pretty much nonexistent in spots by the time that target was shot and i was shooting RN ammo.
It doesn’t keyhole. Here is a target from a week ago shooting 200gr SWC
DFDC3047-CD17-4F7A-8034-EA0FD837B804.jpeg
 
The cardboard backer behind the target was pretty much nonexistent in spots by the time that target was shot and i was shooting RN ammo.
It doesn’t keyhole. Here is a target from a week ago shooting 200gr SWC
View attachment 850796

That explains it! Sorry for raising doubt, it just didn’t look right despite the fact that you clustered your shots nicely.
 
Yea, that pic just shows the target tearing. If they were keyholing you would have the sideways silhouette of a bullet passing through.

I do a lot of testing and have developed a very critical eye, particularly when I am trying to extract the absolute best accuracy I can from a given combination. So if something looks off, I will raise it.

My apologies if I offended the OP.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top