I've been doing some spring testing on the stock Sig 12 rd springs and also the MagGuts 12+ 2 spring kits. I noted that out of 8 stock Sig 12 rd springs, one of the springs had substantially lower spring force than the others. It may be that you got a weak batch of springs.
I tried doing some accelerated life testing by making a bullet shaped plunger and mashing the Sig and the MagGuts springs down 500 times to simulate 500 loadings of the magazines. Both springs lost spring force but did not cause any problems at the range. Since that test I've kept both of those magazines loaded for over 7 months and the spring force has reduced further. I'll be testing these springs at the range in about a week and reporting my results.
My suspicion is that the Sig Springs are reliable enough, however the quality control is lacking and that some of their springs do not initially have enough spring force to last over the lifespan of the magazine.
The ISMI springs that NDZ sells are heat treated and stress relieved AFTER forming, which makes a superior spring that more resistant to stress fatigue failure and should be longer lasting than the Sig springs. I bought 4 - 12rd ISMI magazine springs but I haven't tested them yet.
One of the things I am trying to determine is what minimum spring force is required for reliable operation so that I can periodically measure the spring force and replace any weak springs before they cause a failure to feed or lock back the slide. You really don't want any more spring force than required, as it just causes the cartridges to have more friction against the stripper rail on the slide making it more difficult to retract the slide.
Hard to beat those ISMI springs. Used them in 1911 before getting them for Glocks. My go to for magazine spring and recoil spring replacements.