Striker Fired: What am I Missing?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lmao! I don’t need to show “hard use” handguns or targets. I’m very secure in my shooting ability, thank you.

I’ve got hundreds of handguns, including the finest in the world from both a collectable standpoint and a competition standpoint. I keep them on separate racks in my gun room.

I shoot often and likely put more rounds downrange than you do. Due to sheer volume. I don’t put 10,000 rounds a year through any one gun in particular. However, I feel I’m quite proficient with many platforms.

Does posting targets and “hard use” guns make you some sort of tough guy? 😂
Glad to hear youre secure in your shooting ability. Everyone usually is, right up til you hand them a gun, especially one they arent familiar with, and ask them to show you, but this is the web, eh? :)

And it is the internet, "everyone" is an expert, right? ;)

At least in their own minds. Still secure enough in yours to shoot "the box" challenge? :rofl:

The only reason I post pics of targets or the guns that actually shot them, is because I get tired of people acting like youre are taking out your ass, and cant possibly shoot well with things like stock guns and stock triggers, and short of actually being together to see the proof as it happens, theres no other way to show "some" actual proof.

With all the pics of guns you post up all over the web, I wouldn't think something similar would be too hard to come up with, since you're claiming what you are. But, whatever. If you say so.

Its good to hear someone is actually getting out and shooting a lot too. Thats always a positive thing. If you're shooting more than me, more power to you too, that's great! Im slowing down these days, but Im still trying to wear out a couple of guns in practice and keep up, and Im still usually pretty far ahead of most. Just now got back from the range and dumped another couple hundred rounds into the tumblers before I sat down to this. Now I get to clean guns. :thumbup:
 
By all means enjoy your 6 figures worth of handguns. But don't belittle people that spent several thousand on ammo over the years to become very proficient with the stock Glock trigger. In a self-defense situation that is going to pay off big time.
I’m fine with my SD pistols and HD pistol and shotgun. It’s all good.
 
I don't shoot competition and I'm too old to go to war.
I've got guns with good triggers that shoot pretty good despite my lack of skill, some with great triggers that fire if you blow them a kiss, and some that are just OK. Maybe one or two that make you work for it.
My favorite is usually the last one I bought and for a few days, it's the greatest gun in the history of guns.
If one gun worked for all of us, there would be just one gun.
Probably a Glock 1911
 
Glad to hear youre secure in your shooting ability. Everyone usually is, right up til you hand them a gun, especially one they arent familiar with, and ask them to show you, but this is the web, eh? :)

And it is the internet, "everyone" is an expert, right? ;)

At least in their own minds. Still secure enough in yours to shoot "the box" challenge? :rofl:

The only reason I post pics of targets or the guns that actually shot them, is because I get tired of people acting like youre are taking out your ass, and cant possibly shoot well with things like stock guns and stock triggers, and short of actually being together to see the proof as it happens, theres no other way to show "some" actual proof.

With all the pics of guns you post up all over the web, I wouldn't think something similar would be too hard to come up with, since you're claiming what you are. But, whatever. If you say so.

Its good to hear someone is actually getting out and shooting a lot too. Thats always a positive thing. If you're shooting more than me, more power to you too, that's great! Im slowing down these days, but Im still trying to wear out a couple of guns in practice and keep up, and Im still usually pretty far ahead of most. Just now got back from the range and dumped another couple hundred rounds into the tumblers before I sat down to this. Now I get to clean guns. :thumbup:
I’m no grand master, but I can shoot a little.

I also enjoy photography. Taking pictures of guns is no indication yay or nay or shooting skills. If you think the factory Glock trigger is all that and doesn’t hold you back, you’re a better man than I. However, I think you’d be surprised how well you could do with some others one you give yourself time to adjust.
 
I’m no grand master, but I can shoot a little. I also enjoy photography. Taking pictures of guns is no indication yay or nay or shooting skills. If you think the factory Glock trigger is all that and doesn’t hold you back, you’re a better man than I. However, I think you’d be surprised how well you could do with some others one you give yourself time to adjust.
 
Last edited:
Please stop coming across like an ignoramus.
Because I don't subscribe to your point of view?

What you’re saying is you can only shoot certain guns well, and run from any challenge to master different triggers. lol, if it’s not a Wilson, Brown, or Baer you can’t shoot.
While everyone seems to be trading insults, may I suggest you reread my posts? That is not at all what I'm saying. I spent my entire adult life in the military and law enforcement; while going forth armed daily (and occasionally having to do serious things in bad places) I had to deal with the trigger of whatever firearms I was issued.

What I am saying is, if you can afford it, why settle? The balderdash that there are no bad triggers on modern production handguns, if you continue to propagate that, does only a disservice to those, especially new shooters, trying to learn about the various platforms and improve their skills.

I also said:

Even among striker-fired pistols, any Glock trigger doesn't hold a candle to the triggers on the top-end SIG P-320s (X Series, AXG, 320 Max) or Walther PDP (Pros, Match series). Even the HK VP9 has a easily detectible better trigger than a Glock
At no point was I belittling anyone who desire to keep spending money on ammo for their Glocks.

...and strong tactile reset of Glock
There is more to a good trigger than a "strong tactile reset" and I've talked to a few pro shooters who think instructors often set back shooters by training them to chase the reset.
 
Mine are, but then again, mine are all factory stock triggers, either way. I don't waste money on crutches trying to buy my skill. ;)

Why is it people always want to compare "top end" guns to box stock factory guns to make their points?

:rofl::rofl::rofl:

What constitutes a factory gun for you? Foreign made slave labor? Min wage assembly lines?

Are the SA Pro's or Colt Custom Shop's crutches or factory in your mind?

Obviously the smaller manufactures that pay skilled craftsmen, therefor cost more, are not your cup of tea. Even though a lot are "stock" to that company.

I enjoy 1911’s and Glocks, I guess I’m just a real handgun lover.
Lots of us do too. We all have our opinions and use for them too.. Why else would we own dozens upon dozens of handguns and hang out on message boards talking about them?
2nBz7YT.jpg
Just for track. only one of these guns is not "factory".
 
:rofl::rofl::rofl:

What constitutes a factory gun for you? Foreign made slave labor? Min wage assembly lines?

Are the SA Pro's or Colt Custom Shop's crutches or factory in your mind?

Obviously the smaller manufactures that pay skilled craftsmen, therefor cost more, are not your cup of tea. Even though a lot are "stock" to that company.


Lots of us do too. We all have our opinions and use for them too.. Why else would we own dozens upon dozens of handguns and hang out on message boards talking about them?
View attachment 1203184
Just for track. only one of these guns is not "factory".
There is nothing the matter with opinions, but there is no need to be sarcastic or belittle other people's love of the stock Glock trigger. If you don't like it fine, but don't belittle other people who have had a different experience than you. I have shot several thousands of rounds through Glocks with the stock triggers, I am extremely proficient with them, I don't need anyone telling me that I would be more proficient if I shot something else. I own all the major handgun brands, so let me decide what I can shoot well.
 
Because I don't subscribe to your point of view?


While everyone seems to be trading insults, may I suggest you reread my posts? That is not at all what I'm saying. I spent my entire adult life in the military and law enforcement; while going forth armed daily (and occasionally having to do serious things in bad places) I had to deal with the trigger of whatever firearms I was issued.

What I am saying is, if you can afford it, why settle? The balderdash that there are no bad triggers on modern production handguns, if you continue to propagate that, does only a disservice to those, especially new shooters, trying to learn about the various platforms and improve their skills.

I also said:


At no point was I belittling anyone who desire to keep spending money on ammo for their Glocks.


There is more to a good trigger than a "strong tactile reset" and I've talked to a few pro shooters who think instructors often set back shooters by training them to chase the reset.
Once again, I have shot literally tens of thousands of rounds through stock Glock triggers over a 35-year period. I am extremely proficient with them for their stated purpose, self-defense. I can probably outshoot 99% of cops, as most of them aren't gun enthusiast, and don't shoot nearly as much as me. I own several Sigs, Beretta's, HK, SA, Walther, Colts, Detonics, S&W, Ruger, Stars, Astra, Makarov, various 1911's and many more. You can be very condescending with your "What are you smoking comments" I don't need you to tell me what I would be better off shooting, as I'm age 70, and really don't shoot that much anymore, as I have other interest with my time.
 
IMG_3691.jpeg

IMG_3675.jpeg

That’s awesome and I envy you, which honestly is the whole point of my posts in this thread (not to demean you or anyone else who has no problem with a Glock trigger). Ad a whole, I find striker-fired pistols harder to shoot well but I have the most difficulty with Glocks by far. I have four of them and would like to shoot them better as I’ve said many times, but find the trigger disturbing to my sight picture. These targets were shot at 25 yards offhand, one full magazine. The G17 is one of my home defense guns as I actually love the trigger for that purpose, and it’s been unerringly reliable. For precise work, though, I just can’t do with it what I can do with a (good!) 1911.
 
Seriously Vindag? Where did I belittle you or anyone else? Not once, not ever. Never.
Yes, I read back through the thread, and there were a few others that did the belittling, but not you. I'm not going to call them out, as I don't want the thread to close, and wish this nonsense would stop. If people don't like stock Glock triggers, that is fine, but don't belittle other people who have gotten proficient with them.
 
I don't own any strikers, although I do own a few HK's. Never really wanted one although they are popular with gangbangers, the military and the Po Po. ;)
 
Last edited:
First off, let me start by saying that I really am enjoying the Beretta 92 and am now thinking about a CZ 75 full sized pistol. I also have a Nighthawk GRP and a Springfield "Loaded" that was my father's gun. I get the appeal of all steel guns and even went to great lengths to replace all of the hybrid plastic parts on the Beretta 92.

However, @JTQ hit the nail on the head by mentioning my 92 thread. I can strip my Glock 19 down to the most basic components with a small punch that is on the back of my Endura 4 in the same amount of time to gather all of the tools it will take to simply begin working on the Beretta. I was sitting up on the deck watching the rain come in from the ocean and took my 19 apart while barely looking at the gun.

View attachment 1202336

You don't always need to be able to do this, but when I am out in the desert or way up in the mountains, it is comforting to be able to detail strip your pistol or replace a part without things flying everywhere. This is just one of the pluses of a plastic pistol.
SIG's P series are also pretty basic to field strip. Not sure why a full disassembly would be necessary in the field. Who's going to be carrying all those parts anyway? Certainly not me. Do that at home and replace the parts that see the most wear on a regular schedule. Like the vehicle that got you way up there.
 
Last edited:
Yes, I read back through the thread, and there were a few others that did the belittling, but not you. I'm not going to call them out, as I don't want the thread to close, and wish this nonsense would stop. If people don't like stock Glock triggers, that is fine, but don't belittle other people who have gotten proficient with them.
I actually don’t mind Glock triggers or similar triggers for carry. I just don’t find them great for the range or competitive shooting in stock form. I could definitely see how a lot of practice would improve it.
 
I actually don’t mind Glock triggers or similar triggers for carry. I just don’t find them great for the range or competitive shooting in stock form. I could definitely see how a lot of practice would improve it.
Well, we finally have something we agree on. I never had an interest in competitive shooting. I never even liked going to the range with my buddies, although they use to ask all the time. I always liked to go by myself, so I could get in the zone, and concentrate on shooting. I could also get more rounds off by myself, without the distraction of another person. It was also very relaxing for me. I strictly looked at the Glock trigger as a self-defense/carry trigger. So, I got good with it over a 35-year period by shooting tens of thousands of rounds. There was really no need to "upgrade" the trigger. Now if I was a competitive shooter, I might have used something else.
 
It used to take an unusually set of circumstances to shoot your self with a double action revolver.

UUEfpU0.jpg


and the double action semi pistols were equally hard to shoot your self with, though with effort, it happens. Once found a list of Navy negligent discharges with the Beretta M92FS. Most of the negligent shootings were due to “quick draw” games, and the user pulling the trigger when he thought the pistol was empty. This pistol has a decocker, then the first shot downrange requires a long, and heavy double action pull.

Jj9WXfy.jpg


I did ask a retired Vietnam Veteran Colonel, about 1911 accidental discharges, the one he knew of, was between two 2nd lieutenants playing quick draw. Someone had a round in the chamber. Opps! I heard more from one Huey pilot and a Long Range Reconnaissance Patrol (Lurp). The three 1911 accounts from the LURP were from his law enforcement day and by LEO’s

But the combat competitors are running against time, want to reduce reloads, and they complained loud and fiercely about a long trigger pull for the first shot. The market responded by making mechanisms that are even easier to shoot yourself with.

Perhaps the best known example, a Glock mechanism

r1wyWaK.jpg


and this is the safety

I5Cn04q.jpg


When loaded, these pistols are unsafe outside of their holster as it takes very little effort to pull the trigger and fire the weapon. Holster design and construction is very important. The holster has to be rigid enough not to press on the trigger mechanism. SAFETY WARNING! Worn Leather Holsters Can Cause Accidental Discharges! https://www.itstactical.com/warcom/...her-holsters-can-cause-accidental-discharges/ Holster design has to have the trigger covered, it is not like the days of Cowboy holsters where the trigger guard was open. Nope, holsters have to be smooth sided or the booger hook will accidentally trip off the trigger. Even holstering a striker fired gun as gotten to be hazardous . Enough Glock owners have shot themselves when a shirt sleeve gets coiled around the trigger that there is a device to make Glocks safe to holster: the Glock Gadget https://spotterup.com/the-glock-gadget/

The Army is actually weapon phobic. You don’t get a weapon unless your MOS authorizes it, and you are trained on it. You can be in Indian Country, and you won’t get a weapon. One Vietnam Veteran I know, his radar unit was stationed right next to Cambodia. The Unit Commander and his Soldiers begged for weapons, but higher authority told them, “ARVIN (Army Republic of Vietnam) will protect you” Oh no, when Charlie came visiting, ARVIN ran off. Bud still remembers hiding in the dark, and hearing his buds being shot that night. Over half century later, Bud is still upset about the cry’s and gunshots: only a few Americans survived that night.

And it turns out, there were times in the Infinity Wars, that deaths due to negligent discharges exceeded combat deaths.

The first Glock I got to handle, I thought it was real innovative, until I found the trigger. One barrier to ignition, and that did not take much effort to pull. I have never purchased, nor do I want, one of those things. I consider it too easy to shoot oneself with a striker fired pistol.

It does not take much effort to find accounts of self shootings with striker fired pistols. This just makes me trust them less.

SIG P320 accidental discharge if dropped on



Sig Sauer P320 pistol mishaps reported 2-18-2020


New England gunmaker faces another lawsuit from police officer, ABC News report


Sig Sauer to Settle Lawsuit Over Alleged Safety Glitch in P320 Pistol


Sig Sauer Faces $10 Million Lawsuit over P320 Pistol After Alleged Accidental Discharge Wounds Federal Agent


Tampa police officer sues Sig Sauer alleging weapon fired by itself, causing serious injuries


Lawsuit the Tampa Bay officer filed against SIG


2021 08- 16 Cops Keeps Suing Sig Sauer Because Their Service Weapons Randomly Fire


These only made the news because LEO's were getting shot. I am unaware of any requirement for any negligent discharge with any firearm to be reported for statistical purposes. Absence of evidence is only absence of evidence, not proof of non existence.

Combat games heavily influence the design of firearms. Post WW2, Colt Cocked and locked altered the 1911 so much, it is not the WW1 issue pistol. The modern 1911 has been prioritized for quick draw games. I see old designs, such as the Browning Highpower, being redesigned with beavertails, and long safeties, so to be much faster to action in quick draw games. Originally, the FN Highpower was holstered, nothing in chamber, or hammer down on a round in the chamber. It was easy to thumb cock both the 1911 and FN Highpower.

I believe the Russians carried this nothing in the chamber, magazine in the gun. Can’t prove this, as the Russians may have carried it round in chamber, hammer down. There is no external safety.

GBM0XSZ.jpg


There are inherent problems with combat games. A major one, is that everyone has to go through the course before the day is out. Range considerations make the game area small. And, no one is shooting back, or running up and shooting contestants in the back. Games with real bullets have to be predictable and controllable, or off axis shots will be killing fellow contestants! Combat games start predictably, have predictable patterns. Such as, you face your enemy, you are ready for the start signal, and contestants know what is going to happen. It has to be better than nothing, but, it makes for a firearm design that is optimized for quick draw over all other considerations.

In the real world, I truly think that you will be very lucky if you have the time and space to figure out what is going on, who is the threat, and what is the threat, and then to figure out a plan of action. I am of the opinion, that time and space are more important than the actual firearm you carry, but you only have control over the type of firearm you carry.
 
Last edited:
I think we've gone well beyond the usefulness of a thread when it has devolved to it's current state of dredging up stale news article/videos

I think 5 pages and 120 post should be enough for future readers to get a feel for the discussion
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top