Brady Campaign infests another campus

Status
Not open for further replies.

Warren

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2004
Messages
2,454
Location
Northern California
Story here.


It took only milliseconds for a man to murder Christian Heyne’s mother. He simply aimed a gun at her head and fired.

On their way home from vacation in 2005, Heyne’s parents stopped to visit a family friend. A man the friend was having a disagreement with showed up and shot and killed both him and Heyne’s mother, Janice. Heyne’s father, Timothy, was also shot three times. The gunman went on to shoot two more people and pistol-whip two children before turning the gun on himself. Heyne’s parents were not involved in the dispute. They just happened to be there when the man arrived with a gun.

“People said they were just in the wrong place at the wrong time,” Heyne said. “But the fact of the matter is there is no right place. There is no right time.”

Heyne’s mother was murdered in Walnut Creek, one of the safest cities in the United States.

“If gun violence can happen there, it can happen anywhere,” he said.

In hopes of sparing others the pain of losing loved ones to gun violence, Heyne, a Chico State senior, is starting a university-affiliated chapter of the Brady Campaign. The Chico State chapter is the only one in the nation currently based on a university campus.

Working with the Brady Campaign is a family affair for the Heynes. Timothy has been working with the group since shortly after the shooting, and is currently president of the Ventura County chapter.

The Brady Campaign was started 25 years ago by Jim and Sarah Brady (for whom the Brady Bill, which established a waiting period to buy guns, was named). An aide to Ronald Reagan, Jim Brady was shot in an assassination attempt on the president. The Brady Campaign became the largest gun-control advocacy group in 2001 after merging with the Million Mom March.

The chapter recently gained club recognition by Associated Students and held its first meeting at Woodstock’s Pizza March 12. Heyne had only expected about five people to show up, but nearly 30 people filled the restaurant.

The large turnout is promising, given that the group’s first event, planned for April, will require at least that many participants. The month of April has special significance to those campaigning for gun control. This year it will mark both the nine-year anniversary of the Columbine High School massacre and the one-year anniversary of the Virginia Tech shooting.

On April 16 the group will hold a “lie-in” in the Free Speech Area on Chico State’s campus. Thirty-two students wearing black T-shirts will lie down for three minutes, symbolizing the amount of time it took Virginia Tech shooter Seng-Hui Cho to buy the gun he used to kill 32 students and wound many more before committing suicide.

While the lie-in will focus primarily on preventing gun violence at schools and universities, the club plans to target removing the threat of guns in every aspect of life.

“We want to be able to walk, work and take care of our families without worrying about someone pulling out a gun and taking it all away within a millisecond,” Heyne said.

The club’s goal is not to infringe on Second Amendment rights, but to take guns out of the hands of criminals.

“Our goal is not to take guns away from responsible people, but to prevent violence,” Heyne said. “If the group can save a single life, then everything we’ve done will have been worth it.”


*******************************************************

First off they are clueless about how violence is stopped. Secondly they are clueless about the Brady Bunch's actual goals.

Anyone in the Butte/North Valley area want to do a counter demo?
 
The club’s goal is not to infringe on Second Amendment rights, but to take guns out of the hands of criminals.

I can agree with this statement. I'm happy for any group that wants to take the guns out of the hands of criminals. However, there must be caution with this when their want to "take guns out of the hands of criminals" infringes on the right of law abiding citizens by total disarmament of everyone.
 
“Our goal is not to take guns away from responsible people, but to prevent violence,” Heyne said. “If the group can save a single life, then everything we’ve done will have been worth it.”

Typical anti tripe. I wonder how many people their group will actually kill with their efforts.
 
“Our goal is not to take guns away from responsible people, but to prevent violence...,” she said, just aftering me a real deal on the Brooklyn Bridge.

Jim H.
 
Pain and rage have blinded this young man. Misguided him. Left him in a state of delusion, where he has actually come to believe that violence can by solved by nonviolence.

Shed a tear, ladies and gentleman, because logic has failed and irrational "feel-good" nannyism has corrupted another young life.


To paraphrase someone's sig line here: "A conclusion isn't necessarily a right answer; it's merely a convenient place to stop thinking."
 
Do we have any folks at that school?

Be interesting if, a second or so after they lie down, someone pulls a bullhorn out of a backpack, and announces that if they, a trained target shooter, had been allowed to carry on campus, that the bodies wouldn't be on the ground, except for the shooter.

Also... 32 - are they counting He Who Should Not Have a Name?
 
Someone in the area should stage an "Alive-In". Find 32 people in the city who have successfully defended themselves with a gun...

Wear white T-shirts.

"I had a gun. I'm still alive."
 
Heyne, a Chico State senior, is starting a university-affiliated chapter of the Brady Campaign. The Chico State chapter is the only one in the nation currently based on a university campus.
That sure sounds to me like brady is concerned enough about the concealed carry on campus groups that they feel like they need to begin to fight them. Thats great to hear.
 
Cho's purchase was illegal on the federal and state level! When will people get it? The court failed to report his mental state, but his purchase was still completely illegal.
 
Why couldn't they just have another, Four Hundred and Thirty Two mom march. ;)
I am not even sure if I should feel sorry for the backwards and self destructive activities seen to come from the minds of those associated with the bradys.
 
Cho's purchase was illegal on the federal and state level! When will people get it?
No, it wasn't. He hadn't been adjudicated deficient--the court's ruling on his mental status fell short of the legal bar.

Under current, more stringent rules, he would have been a prohibited person, but under the standard at the time, his purchases were lawful.
 
It took only milliseconds for a man to murder Christian Heyne’s mother. He simply aimed a gun at her head and fired.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

“We want to be able to walk, work and take care of our families without worrying about someone pulling out a gun and taking it all away within a millisecond,” Heyne said.

So slow, drawn out forms of murder are ok with Heyne? What is the message here?

“If the group can save a single life, then everything we’ve done will have been worth it.”

And since they'll be fighting to keep people from protecting themselves they'll be costing lives. So is saving only one life worth costing any number of lives or is there a point where the value of saving one life is tipped by the cost of many other lives? Do they teach those college kids math anymore?

Most of the worst laws have come into existence because one person experienced a tragedy and in a fit of rage and grief took it out on everybody else.
 
hankdatank1362 said:

Shed a tear, ladies and gentleman, because logic has failed and irrational "feel-good" nannyism has corrupted another young life.

Reminds me of "As Good As It Gets" w/ Jack Nicholson playing Melvin Udall, the OCD writer:

Receptionist: How do you write women so well?
Melvin Udall: I think of a man, and I take away reason and accountability.​

That is my central thesis on these feel-good, nanny-state solutions in that they are usually championed by women and are devoid of any logic, reason, or accountability. Just do something, it's for the children, etc. ad nauseum.
 
“Our goal is not to take guns away from responsible people, but to prevent violence,”

How exactly is he going to prevent violence?
 
Its amazing how the press continues to fawn over HCI's illogic like their a prophet trying to save me from my evil sins. It never fails they will completely ignore the number of self defensive purposes and only reflect on some one's death from a firearm.

I remember after 911 when I was recalled to active duty, Israelis were trying to explain to the US government on how to prevent hijacked planes. You see the Israelis said the US focuses too much on finding the bomb whereas they would have focused on finding the person.

Reminds me of gun control where one wants to ban or control an object but say nothing of the criminal walking around looking to cause problems.
 
Someone asked if only slow, drawn out murders should be allowed.
Of course, no murders should be allowed, nor are they alllowed.
But, imagine if all who commit murder figured that "hey, i am a convicted felon (or mentally ill) i am not alloed to have a gun, nor am i allowed to carry a knife or a big stick outside of my own house, i better strangle that poor bastard i am about to victimize" Then armed lawabiding bystanders will have loads of time to draw their Beretta 93s or M134s and either make the perpetrator cease and desist or simply shoot him.
The Antis are offering us quite an utopia where they "dont mean to take guns away from law abiding citizens, only make it impossible for criminals to get them". Too bad that they dont mean what they say.
 
This type of knee jerk reaction is common after a shooting of this type. These things aren't new, they just get more press these days because there are five hundred channels of drivel on television and they need to fill air time.

When I was eight my best friend's father came home and tried to kill all three of his children with a twelve gauge. The kids had barricaded themselves in a bedroom and the oldest was putting the younger sister out the window when the father shot through the door, through the bed they had used to block the door, and killed my best friend. The other two children escaped and the father turned the shotgun on himself. This made the local news but there was never a mention of it on any national service. These days it would be all over CNN, and the liberals in congress would use it to try and further limit our right to protect ourselves. The first thing they would want to do is ban pistols, even though the murder/suicide involved a shotgun. We can't win trying to reason these people out of an argument they weren't reasoned into. Reason just doesn't enter the equation on the anti side of this argument, and never has.

I have a solution, let's ban all guns!!! While were at it why don't we also make it illegal to import, sell, or use heroin or cocaine. New laws should just deter those nasty criminals from doing illegal things, right?

What universe do these people live in? I understand the desire to want to do something after having members of your family gunned down, but really, messing with the second amendment isn't going to stop this type of thing. It never has, and it never will. Criminals - by definition - don't obey laws, so passing more laws just doesn't do anything but disarm the law abiding citizens and make it easier for the criminals to victimize the rest of us.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top