• You are using the old Black Responsive theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

Wanted: Weirdest gun pics!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Schwarzlose m/07 and Skoda M1909:

skodascwarzloseyt9.jpg


Ultramatic LV:

Ultramatic_LV.jpg


IM Arms series:

post-1191756504.jpg

post-1191997386.jpg

Last-Ditch Imperial Japanese weapons:

post-1193043476.jpg
 
Last edited:
Not quite all guns are beautiful:

http://arthurshall.com/x_2007_manly_firearms.shtml

THE TEN MANLIEST FIREARMS
by Guest Author, Crazy Einar
Manly Firearms, Manly Guns

This was a hard piece to write, because guns by definition are manly, except for Berettas, gold-plated TEC9s, .25 caliber pistols or anything made by the French. To simplify things, I have limited it to modern cartridge firearms a man might, can, and should collect and shoot. There are certainly other manly weapons, and you may have a different list. As long as the list contains nothing French, gold-plated, .25 or with pearl grips (which Patton correctly observed are the mark of a New Orleans pimp), it is a good list.

(Article is here)

obligatory pro-gun close:

Arthur Demands You Read...


The Great Book of Guns: An Illustrated Hi…
Chris McNab (Hardcover - Oct 27, 2004)
$24.48
More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Cri…
John R. Lott Jr. (Paperback - Jun 15, 2000)
$11.20
Better to Beg Forgiveness . . .
Michael Z. Williamson (Hardcover - Nov 6, 2007)
$5.98
The Declaration of Independence and the…
(Paperback - Sep 25, 2000)
$4.95
:neener:
 
Re the Steyr AMR, madmike said,

It won't be 4700fps for more than a few FEET. Friction will very rapidly slow it.

I dunno about that. The projectile (a saboted dart)weighs about 555 grains and it's .22 inches in diameter, made of tungsten (very dense --about 1 3/4 times as dense as lead.)

Pretty good sectional density in my book.

Even applying an advertising hype factor of 10%, it ought to hold that velocity pretty good, despite the fin drag.

Terry, 230RN
 
Last edited:
It's got nothing to do with the density. There's a flat limit of how fast you can travel in atmosphere without either gravity or power. Something that small can't maintain the velocity against friction. There's a reason most bullets don't go much over 3500 fps. 30-06 Spfd accelerator starts at 4080, but inside 100 yards is below 3500. 7mm Firehawk starts at 3625, inside 100 yards is down to 3373. .17 Remington, 4040/3284. .223 40 gr, 3800/3305. .220 Swift, 4200/3678, then 3190 by 200 yards. .243 55 gr, 4025/3597. You need tremendously more propellant to get those velocities, and there simply isn't enough mass to maintain it.

Now, if you get into DU APFSDS tank rounds, or meteors, you can do it...but not stuff measured in fractions of an ounce. And fins add MORE friction, not less.
 
Madmike:

Hm. I posted this on the wrong thread a couple of days ago:

I'm not sure I want to go along 100% with the penetration claims at 1000 yards either, but I must disagree with you on the effect of sectional density.

Sectional density (and projectile profile --added later) has everything to do with velocity retention, and comparing lead hunting bullets with a tungsten 555 grain "arrow" less than 1/4" diameter is not appropriate.

Sorry about that.
 
I still want to see neutral test figures. Not that there's any practical way to shoot such a beast.

I was crunching numbers for meteors last night, and light gas guns as well. For a lot of materials and launches, faster = slower, when all is said and done. The velocity is utterly wasted as heat.

These won't be going that fast, but they're still not going to be efficient or practical, IMO.
 
I've posted this elsewhere but it should go here too:

Gun-knife.jpg

This thread makes me want to get a CNC machine and a manufactures license. Who wouldn't love a new production Lugers and Broomhandle mausers?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top