The_Armed_Therapist
Member
This question has to do with my wife; she is small and petite. She really likes the Glock 26 and the XD sub-compact. Actually, she LOVES them. However, even with their smaller sizes relative to the compact and full-sized versions of these pistols, concealing with her normal dress is a bit of a stretch.
If we lived in a more friendly state, she wouldn't be so worried about it and would probably just buy one of these models--BUT, here in Ohio, guns are banned in a LOT of places. In Idaho, from where we came to Ohio, basically placed the burden on business owners to ask you to leave or charge with trespassing if you don't. In Ohio, for those unfamiliar with it, stores can kind of "opt in" to a state gun ban where carrying in Papa John's can be equal in magnitude to carrying onto a College campus or hospital.
It isn't about her wanting to carry in places where they are banned, but if you're not paying close enough attention and you miss the sign, you will be charged as a criminal if the thick Glock or XD shows through somehow.
With a pocket .380, such as the Ruger LCP, Taurus TCP, Kel-Tec 3A-T, Kahr P380, and Sig 238, no one will ever see it if she makes a mistake (3 small kids can be quite distracting).
So my question is whether or not adjusting wardrobe and taking the chance on the sub-compact 9mm is worth it or if the safer route of a pocket .380 makes the most sense. I know a lot of it simply has to do with what she's more comfortable doing, but I want to know if there is anything we may not be considering.
Ideally, I'd get her both... But that isn't very realistic right now. In fact, part of the reason getting just one is a possibility is because her pro-firearm Father wants to contribute to a special Christmas present for her.
Also, right now she carries a Kel-Tec P32... But is obviously not satisfied.
Kellen
If we lived in a more friendly state, she wouldn't be so worried about it and would probably just buy one of these models--BUT, here in Ohio, guns are banned in a LOT of places. In Idaho, from where we came to Ohio, basically placed the burden on business owners to ask you to leave or charge with trespassing if you don't. In Ohio, for those unfamiliar with it, stores can kind of "opt in" to a state gun ban where carrying in Papa John's can be equal in magnitude to carrying onto a College campus or hospital.
It isn't about her wanting to carry in places where they are banned, but if you're not paying close enough attention and you miss the sign, you will be charged as a criminal if the thick Glock or XD shows through somehow.
With a pocket .380, such as the Ruger LCP, Taurus TCP, Kel-Tec 3A-T, Kahr P380, and Sig 238, no one will ever see it if she makes a mistake (3 small kids can be quite distracting).
So my question is whether or not adjusting wardrobe and taking the chance on the sub-compact 9mm is worth it or if the safer route of a pocket .380 makes the most sense. I know a lot of it simply has to do with what she's more comfortable doing, but I want to know if there is anything we may not be considering.
Ideally, I'd get her both... But that isn't very realistic right now. In fact, part of the reason getting just one is a possibility is because her pro-firearm Father wants to contribute to a special Christmas present for her.
Also, right now she carries a Kel-Tec P32... But is obviously not satisfied.
Kellen