1851 or 1860?

Status
Not open for further replies.

martysport

Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2011
Messages
68
Location
Frogland
I'm fairly new to BP shooting and after getting a Pietta 1858 (IMHO the best looking revolver there is :) ) I think I'm hooked :evil:
I have decided I HAVE the get another BP gun.
I'm happy with the quality and price of the Piettas so I have decided to buy Pietta again, question is which?
I've norrowed the choice down to the 1860 in .44 but quite like the 1851 too. What is the main differance between the two?

The place where I order from can also supply a Uberti Dragoon 2nd version which after seeing (well, more like hearing) the following movie clip made me really want one, but it's nearly twice the price of the Pietta 1860/1851!!!

Link to video
 
Main difference is grip length with the Army being about 1/4" longer (to handle the devasting recoil of the 44 caliber gun)
The Army has an improved loading lever
It's purtier.
 
I like the look of the 1851s. It is an open top with an octagon barrel. Looks older and there are more versions of them out here to chose from.

Two nice looking ones are here, own them both.
http://www.cabelas.com/product/Shoo...istols/_/N-1100201&WTz_l=Unknown;cat104503680

http://www.cabelas.com/product/Shoo...istols/_/N-1100201&WTz_l=Unknown;cat104503680

This one is a little too much for me, don't care for the gold cylinder
http://www.cabelas.com/product/Shoo...istols/_/N-1100201&WTz_l=Unknown;cat104503680

I do not know IMHO of a 1860 that looks as nice.
 
And if you want good looks and the improved features of the 1860 but prefer to stay with the 36 caliber bore and grips, consider the 1861. Reputedly, Sam'l Colt's favorite.
 
But these don't look bad either
 

Attachments

  • photo-3.jpg
    photo-3.jpg
    269.3 KB · Views: 46
Last edited:
Main difference is grip length with the Army being about 1/4" longer (to handle the devasting recoil of the 44 caliber gun) ~ NOZ

What are you shooting in your black powder revolver??? I've been shooting C&B revolvers well into three decades and never felt what I would come close to calling "devasting recoil."

Traditionally the main difference in Army/Navy designations are the caliber. Army models were 44 and the Navies were .36. Both are very comfortable to shoot compared to modern handguns using smokeless powder. I personally favor the pocket models.


Shown are a Colts 2nd Generation Navy, 2nd Generation Pocket Navy and a 2nd Generation Pocket Police. All have pre-ban elephant ivory grips by Jerry Meacham.
 

Attachments

  • Three Colts.jpg
    Three Colts.jpg
    270.2 KB · Views: 43
Last edited:
pohill, is that a General Custer, Signature Series in your second pic?

Nice
 
Yeah, that's the Custer Commemorative. I haven't fired it yet and I don't think I will.

PRM, Do you shoot your 2nd Generation collection? Real ivory? That's cool.
IMG_0007.jpg
 
Last edited:
My prefference is for the 1860, but only because I was a big fan of The Outlaw Josie Wales as a kid. A buddy has the 1851. It shoots OK, cant knock its function, but it just isnt as good looking to me.
 
Well now, I see no one has mentioned the mystique of the 1851 yet. It is reputed by many to the best-balanced handgun ever produced. Aiming it is sometimes compared to pointing a finger.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top