Case is: Malpasso v. Pallozzi.
A coalition of 21 state attorneys general is asking the Supreme Court to strike down a Maryland law that denies concealed carry permits unless applicants can convince local officials they have a “good and substantial reason” to be granted one by local authorities.
This would be a good case for SCOTUS, no?
If SCOTUS took this case and ruled that one does not need a good reason to obtain a carry permit (a 2nd Amendment win) doesn't it also mean that you need a permit to carry outside the home?
I believe Constitutional Carry should be the law of the land. You shouldn't need a permit to exercise your 2nd Amendment right.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/21-st...e-court-to-void-maryland-gun-law_3184841.html
A coalition of 21 state attorneys general is asking the Supreme Court to strike down a Maryland law that denies concealed carry permits unless applicants can convince local officials they have a “good and substantial reason” to be granted one by local authorities.
This would be a good case for SCOTUS, no?
If SCOTUS took this case and ruled that one does not need a good reason to obtain a carry permit (a 2nd Amendment win) doesn't it also mean that you need a permit to carry outside the home?
I believe Constitutional Carry should be the law of the land. You shouldn't need a permit to exercise your 2nd Amendment right.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/21-st...e-court-to-void-maryland-gun-law_3184841.html
Last edited: