30mag
Member
So, I'm 17. I own a Mossberg ATR-100 in .30-06, and a Remington 1100 in 12 gauge.
Just a little about myself. I'm pretty new to this forum. This is my second post... ANYWAYS...
I'm looking for a handgun. I want something pretty powerful. I've been looking and looking and looking and looking. First I thought I wanted a .357 magnum, but I've decided that I really would rather have an semi-auto than a revolver.
I don't want a polymer frame pistol. I'm sure they're wonderful firearms, but I don't like the idea of extensive use in plastic in a firearm. I'd rather have a revolver than a polymer frame semi-auto. Moving on, I think I've decided on a Baby Eagle in .40 S&W. I bought my .30-06 (my first and only bolt-action rifle, before that the only firearm I had shot was a 12 gauge and a Marlin .22) because I wanted a powerful firearm. A rifle that would keep me on my toes, something that would be a challenge to shoot. Same thing for the pistol. I've thought about the .357 alot, and decided ammo is pretty expensive compared to 9mm, so I was thinking about a 9. But I've decided to move up a step in power level, just because I don't want to buy a nine and be disappointed by the lack of "boom" (and the .357 is still in the back of my mind). But, I think a .40 ought to be a good balance. Ammo is cheaper than .357, and more powerful than 9mm.
Now, the question is which handgun?
I like the Baby Eagle because it has a steel frame, isn't very expensive, and made by a reputable company.
I am open to suggestions. I would REALLY prefer steel-framed handguns only. Highest priority is cost. I'm kinda poor seeing as how I'm only 17. If you can make an argument for a revolver as opposed to an automatic, I would like to hear it. I'm pretty open-minded at this point.
Just a little about myself. I'm pretty new to this forum. This is my second post... ANYWAYS...
I'm looking for a handgun. I want something pretty powerful. I've been looking and looking and looking and looking. First I thought I wanted a .357 magnum, but I've decided that I really would rather have an semi-auto than a revolver.
I don't want a polymer frame pistol. I'm sure they're wonderful firearms, but I don't like the idea of extensive use in plastic in a firearm. I'd rather have a revolver than a polymer frame semi-auto. Moving on, I think I've decided on a Baby Eagle in .40 S&W. I bought my .30-06 (my first and only bolt-action rifle, before that the only firearm I had shot was a 12 gauge and a Marlin .22) because I wanted a powerful firearm. A rifle that would keep me on my toes, something that would be a challenge to shoot. Same thing for the pistol. I've thought about the .357 alot, and decided ammo is pretty expensive compared to 9mm, so I was thinking about a 9. But I've decided to move up a step in power level, just because I don't want to buy a nine and be disappointed by the lack of "boom" (and the .357 is still in the back of my mind). But, I think a .40 ought to be a good balance. Ammo is cheaper than .357, and more powerful than 9mm.
Now, the question is which handgun?
I like the Baby Eagle because it has a steel frame, isn't very expensive, and made by a reputable company.
I am open to suggestions. I would REALLY prefer steel-framed handguns only. Highest priority is cost. I'm kinda poor seeing as how I'm only 17. If you can make an argument for a revolver as opposed to an automatic, I would like to hear it. I'm pretty open-minded at this point.