44-40 vs 357 mag for lever gun

The 44-40 is like a Jeep...you either love it with a passion or hate it. If you do not love the 44-40 with a passion, I suggest the 357.
I agree. I don't hate it but I do think you have to love the .44-40. It doesn't do anything for me when I can have another .44Spl or .44Mag but I do love the .38-40. Currently have three revolvers and an Uberti 1873 rifle but would take a new Rossi in the chambering in a heartbeat.
 
The brass is either romantic or something to hold propellant to send a bullet on its way. Wouldn't trade off Rossi .357's or .44 mag's but did trade away 45 colts. Plus you cant have just one since you'll want the 16'' and the 24''. The difference on average yard deer between the three is noticeable. If your into black powder 44-40 would be my only choice
 
Been thinking about a lever gun. Thinking has evolved to an itch, and as we know, itches need scratching. Now I know I want lever rifle chambered for a pistol cartridge. For my purposes I've narrowed it to 44-50 or 357 mag. For 44-50 I need to buy a die set; I already have 38/357 dies. Apart from that, can anyone think of anything that would tip the scales in favor of either cartridge?

If you're going to hunt with it, definitely the 44-40, if not, take your pick.

Regarding cartridges, it doesn't always have to be about what cartridge is best or most powerful, we can choose cartridges for no other reason than "just because". At a period in time when I already owned a .357 lever and a .44 Magnum lever, I bought an 1866 Uberti Sporting Rifle in 44-40 and I'm glad I did, and I still have it.

koseLiJl.jpg


I took the time to regulate the ladder sights to my particular load (220 gr. cast FP and a case full of Swiss 3Fg) and it is a hoot to shoot at 200 and 300 yds.

A few years ago I took the '66 to the deer stand with me and shot a scrub buck. The buck didn't die any more slowly of quickly than it would have had it been shot with a .44 Magnum, but there was something gratifying about using an old-school rifle and the boom, fire and smoke from the black powder load.

k5eDrCDl.jpg


Good luck with your choice.

ETA- There's plenty of 44-40 brass on GunBroker.

35W
 
Oh yeah, I have a Marlin 1894C chambered for the 357 as well ;-)

So get both!
23380398_819815621532356_556779543456892490_n.jpg 23561759_822891514558100_6371456766796688273_n (1).jpg

Got this one last year with the 73' 44-40 in -1 degree temps
1250.jpg


Scratch one beaver with the 73'
Untitled.png


Quite a few groundhogs
351490458_1388254458387094_2469207179072306060_n.jpg 351260975_803858964780398_5571558187124420348_n.jpg 351041028_806132840909251_1387719421788825929_n.jpg 351374222_753160133258617_8184681552235514400_n.jpg

The coyote was shot on the old logging road just above the carport. Most of the groundhogs were shot in this area as well. The beavers were shot in the pond to the left of the brick/wood fence.
351757414_651027603575831_7701873202190630720_n.jpg 356954772_756221899615819_8898608477380090596_n.jpg

That is my ten file limit! :)
Happy New Year!!
 
Last edited:
I'm probably not going to hunt with this rifle because I have a Marlin 336 chambered for 30-30 for that purpose. It's a real comfortable gun and I use it with iron sights because where I hunt nearly all shots are within 100 yards and you have to make up your mind fast.
 
Another vote for .357.

Less expensive whether you buy commercial or reload. The thin wall .44-40 require more attention when reloading because they crinkle easily.

Availability, no contest, .357 and the alternative, .38Spl., are everywhere, not so much for the .44-40.

Unless you’re shooting solely for authenticity, in my opinion, .357 is the way to go.
 
I made that decision and bought an Uberti 1873 in .44-40. It’s the authentic experience so to speak. A 215 grain lead slug propelled by a case full of Ffg black powder.

I’d like a Rossi .357 just the same, though… but my itch is scratched well enough.
 
Back
Top