44 Mag Revolver or 357 Mag Rifle Vs. Grizzly

Status
Not open for further replies.
There is a false sense of security with a firearm where bears are concerned. Having been in this line of work as an African Professional hunter. I have had to follow up animals that fight back. I have also been knocked down clawed and chewed by a bear in Washington state, while I had a Ruger Redhawk loaded with hot 300 Grain XTP bullets and Randy Garretts ammo in my holster.

Some observations with a reality perspective are in order. If you are knowingly entering an area you truly believe to be at risk for an attack, you need to prepare with prudent choices.

For starters every single person in the party needs to be familiar with the gun. It will do no good at all if it's on the hip of the person being mauled. Nor will it leaned against a tree while your wife or children are watching you get chewed because they cannot operate the weapon.

If your team on this trip cannot all manipulate the weapon effectively then you have some serious handicap issues that should lead to a change of back country locations. Seriously, if you have the certain likely hood in your mind that bears can cause you trouble, then you need to prepare. If you don't have any chance of a problem you don't need a gun.

Would you race a car with a marginal roll cage? Parachute with a low cost chute? Scuba dive with a questionable tank? jump a dirt bike with a bicycle helmet? etc.

It's this wide line in the sand that creates some kind of romance in packing a bear killing crumpling weapon. Few folks on the adventure will master the 44 mag revolver. Furthermore it's on the hip of only one person. A long gun like a 20 gage shotgun is a far better option. Not many bears are going to handle the pounding of 6 shots of buck into the head and shoulders. This can be handled by most everyone in a group. This will not work well for the poor sap under a bear being chewed on while his teenage daughter is required to shoot the bear off of dad with BUCKSHOT!

There is not good option here, and Bear spray may be the absolute worst idea possible. I used bear spray on snared bears to see it's effects several times. After about the third time, with the wind wrong I was blinded and had my eyes watering for 30 minutes. Another issue is that it only contains a full power stream for a few squirts. Most team members will discharge the bulk of this well before the bear is in range. Then the stream gets shorter and wider, and before you know it the can is empty and your own eyes and nose are burning so bad you're not only under attack but now you can no longer see either.

If everyone has a can and they all start with the spray most of you will certainly get blinded with the wind moving it through the area. If you have never felt this in your eyes, it's impressive to say the least. I'm not suggesting its always a bad idea. It's just high risk for your team as well. I had hunters in Alaska spray the bushes around the camp with a can one night. As if this was a deterent? It requires some education for the majority to grasp the use. The biggest struggle is spraying the contents when a bear is seen long before the bear is close enough to be effected.

The old story of any gun is better then a sharp stick is probably fair and true. But consider the situation with a dose of reality. If you just want to buy and pack a gun for "bears" do what ever you want. If you are absolutely and truly going into bear country with the serious need for protection, then your whole group needs training and practice. You having a gun when you're being mauled is of no use.

Mine was on my hip, I was hit from behind and knocked flat, all the air out of my lungs and I could not breath on gasp of air. It was several seconds before I came around to realize what was happening. When I considered the gun and moved to get it, that bear bit at my shoulder and the back of my neck with a vengeance until I laid still. Moving to reach the gun just triggered it's biting more.

When you put yourself in a situation of danger, that gun must be in your hands. If you have a shotgun or long gun, NO SLING!

A slung gun or holstered gun is worthless as I have experienced, it must be in your hands. If you're not focused and dedicated to the point of walking the bush with a gun held in your hands, then you're not really scared and in danger, right? Somebody in the group needs to hold the gun. Pass it around taking turns if need be. Where Grizzly and Brown bears are concerned at least a 30/06 rifle, or a 20 gage minimum should be used. A 12 gage is far better, but it must be used by the group. Multiple guns of different types would be best for the whole group.
 
JJHACK,

Peter Chapstick did one even better.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Hathaway_Capstick

He was a PH for many years in Africa and he used a football helmet, marine leatherneck guard, and formica tile vest to stop leopard and lion attacks that got by his gun (but it was no help with the other three of the big five.)

Yes just strapping on a gun is not the total answer, nor is it in self defense against two legged critters, but it is a vital element in defending yourself unless you are a Sasha Seimel.

And even he packed a pistol (and shot himself in the foot.)

Deaf
 
.44 or .357 for grizzlies?
The best way to keep a grizzly from mauling you is to stick the muzzle of the .44 or .357 in your mouth and pull the trigger.
 
There is a false sense of security with a firearm where bears are concerned. Having been in this line of work as an African Professional hunter. I have had to follow up animals that fight back. I have also been knocked down clawed and chewed by a bear in Washington state, while I had a Ruger Redhawk loaded with hot 300 Grain XTP bullets and Randy Garretts ammo in my holster.

Some observations with a reality perspective are in order. If you are knowingly entering an area you truly believe to be at risk for an attack, you need to prepare with prudent choices.

For starters every single person in the party needs to be familiar with the gun. It will do no good at all if it's on the hip of the person being mauled. Nor will it leaned against a tree while your wife or children are watching you get chewed because they cannot operate the weapon.

If your team on this trip cannot all manipulate the weapon effectively then you have some serious handicap issues that should lead to a change of back country locations. Seriously, if you have the certain likely hood in your mind that bears can cause you trouble, then you need to prepare. If you don't have any chance of a problem you don't need a gun.

Would you race a car with a marginal roll cage? Parachute with a low cost chute? Scuba dive with a questionable tank? jump a dirt bike with a bicycle helmet? etc.

It's this wide line in the sand that creates some kind of romance in packing a bear killing crumpling weapon. Few folks on the adventure will master the 44 mag revolver. Furthermore it's on the hip of only one person. A long gun like a 20 gage shotgun is a far better option. Not many bears are going to handle the pounding of 6 shots of buck into the head and shoulders. This can be handled by most everyone in a group. This will not work well for the poor sap under a bear being chewed on while his teenage daughter is required to shoot the bear off of dad with BUCKSHOT!

There is not good option here, and Bear spray may be the absolute worst idea possible. I used bear spray on snared bears to see it's effects several times. After about the third time, with the wind wrong I was blinded and had my eyes watering for 30 minutes. Another issue is that it only contains a full power stream for a few squirts. Most team members will discharge the bulk of this well before the bear is in range. Then the stream gets shorter and wider, and before you know it the can is empty and your own eyes and nose are burning so bad you're not only under attack but now you can no longer see either.

If everyone has a can and they all start with the spray most of you will certainly get blinded with the wind moving it through the area. If you have never felt this in your eyes, it's impressive to say the least. I'm not suggesting its always a bad idea. It's just high risk for your team as well. I had hunters in Alaska spray the bushes around the camp with a can one night. As if this was a deterent? It requires some education for the majority to grasp the use. The biggest struggle is spraying the contents when a bear is seen long before the bear is close enough to be effected.

The old story of any gun is better then a sharp stick is probably fair and true. But consider the situation with a dose of reality. If you just want to buy and pack a gun for "bears" do what ever you want. If you are absolutely and truly going into bear country with the serious need for protection, then your whole group needs training and practice. You having a gun when you're being mauled is of no use.

Mine was on my hip, I was hit from behind and knocked flat, all the air out of my lungs and I could not breath on gasp of air. It was several seconds before I came around to realize what was happening. When I considered the gun and moved to get it, that bear bit at my shoulder and the back of my neck with a vengeance until I laid still. Moving to reach the gun just triggered it's biting more.

When you put yourself in a situation of danger, that gun must be in your hands. If you have a shotgun or long gun, NO SLING!

A slung gun or holstered gun is worthless as I have experienced, it must be in your hands. If you're not focused and dedicated to the point of walking the bush with a gun held in your hands, then you're not really scared and in danger, right? Somebody in the group needs to hold the gun. Pass it around taking turns if need be. Where Grizzly and Brown bears are concerned at least a 30/06 rifle, or a 20 gage minimum should be used. A 12 gage is far better, but it must be used by the group. Multiple guns of different types would be best for the whole group.
Well thought out and well written JJHACK.

Yes there are many with questions about bears and the outdoors. I have asked my own share of questions regarding this, not being a hunter nor having first hand experience shooting large animals. Especially when they are charging or attacking.

You mentioned such a key point. Training. And for pistol vs rifle? Both and spray, with all in camp trained to use any of the three (or more)

Bears will usually avoid humans provided you don't make your camp into a feeding station for them. Simple common sense here.

MHO, prepare for the worst situation, leave in the best situation. Training and equipment.

OP, you are asking the right questions. Just that they have been asked so many times, some may be hardened. Keep on track!
 
Just to muddy the waters, why was the choice between a .44 revo and a .357 carbine? Why not a .44 lever gun? Except ammo, they cost the same and weigh the same as a .357.
 
Didn't read any replies, short answer, neither. Have you ever watched a Grizzly charge? Bear spray and a 45-70 son.If the bear wasn't totally committed bear spray should work fine.
 
If those two were my only options, I wouldn't even hesitate to go with the 44 mag. SRH over a .357 mag. rifle. Against a charging grizz, I would want as much projectile as possible, flying as fast as possible, and built for penetration. My personal pick would probably be something like a JSP of no less than 240 grains, on top of a full tilt charge of H110.

But even with a big bore cartridge such as 44 mag., I would by no means feel I have the upper hand against an adult charging grizz, and would continue shooting it until I see him, or her, laying motionless on the ground for a good 10 minutes before I approach it. And I would probably spend those 10 minutes changing my under ware and reloading my revolver.

I've actually had several hair rasing encounters with bears, not grizzly, but bears none the less that were aggressive, and or, too close for comfort.

GS
 
Just to muddy the waters, why was the choice between a .44 revo and a .357 carbine? Why not a .44 lever gun? Except ammo, they cost the same and weigh the same as a .357.

That's what the OP has access to. And it is a question of what is the best option between the two, not what is the best option out there.
 
Shot placement is what is the most important here and for most people that means the 357 carbine (or handgun). I feel confident I could get at least one well placed shot into the bear with the carbine. I could probably do the same with a revolver.

A 44 magnum revolver is something I'm not familiar with so I would hesitate to choose it over the 357 carbine without a lot of practice. If I hit the bear properly will it make a difference? If I hit it poorly will it make a difference? I don't know. Maybe not.
 
There is a false sense of security with a firearm where bears are concerned. Having been in this line of work as an African Professional hunter. I have had to follow up animals that fight back. I have also been knocked down clawed and chewed by a bear in Washington state, while I had a Ruger Redhawk loaded with hot 300 Grain XTP bullets and Randy Garretts ammo in my holster.

Some observations with a reality perspective are in order. If you are knowingly entering an area you truly believe to be at risk for an attack, you need to prepare with prudent choices.

For starters every single person in the party needs to be familiar with the gun. It will do no good at all if it's on the hip of the person being mauled. Nor will it leaned against a tree while your wife or children are watching you get chewed because they cannot operate the weapon.

If your team on this trip cannot all manipulate the weapon effectively then you have some serious handicap issues that should lead to a change of back country locations. Seriously, if you have the certain likely hood in your mind that bears can cause you trouble, then you need to prepare. If you don't have any chance of a problem you don't need a gun.

Would you race a car with a marginal roll cage? Parachute with a low cost chute? Scuba dive with a questionable tank? jump a dirt bike with a bicycle helmet? etc.

It's this wide line in the sand that creates some kind of romance in packing a bear killing crumpling weapon. Few folks on the adventure will master the 44 mag revolver. Furthermore it's on the hip of only one person. A long gun like a 20 gage shotgun is a far better option. Not many bears are going to handle the pounding of 6 shots of buck into the head and shoulders. This can be handled by most everyone in a group. This will not work well for the poor sap under a bear being chewed on while his teenage daughter is required to shoot the bear off of dad with BUCKSHOT!

There is not good option here, and Bear spray may be the absolute worst idea possible. I used bear spray on snared bears to see it's effects several times. After about the third time, with the wind wrong I was blinded and had my eyes watering for 30 minutes. Another issue is that it only contains a full power stream for a few squirts. Most team members will discharge the bulk of this well before the bear is in range. Then the stream gets shorter and wider, and before you know it the can is empty and your own eyes and nose are burning so bad you're not only under attack but now you can no longer see either.

If everyone has a can and they all start with the spray most of you will certainly get blinded with the wind moving it through the area. If you have never felt this in your eyes, it's impressive to say the least. I'm not suggesting its always a bad idea. It's just high risk for your team as well. I had hunters in Alaska spray the bushes around the camp with a can one night. As if this was a deterent? It requires some education for the majority to grasp the use. The biggest struggle is spraying the contents when a bear is seen long before the bear is close enough to be effected.

The old story of any gun is better then a sharp stick is probably fair and true. But consider the situation with a dose of reality. If you just want to buy and pack a gun for "bears" do what ever you want. If you are absolutely and truly going into bear country with the serious need for protection, then your whole group needs training and practice. You having a gun when you're being mauled is of no use.

Mine was on my hip, I was hit from behind and knocked flat, all the air out of my lungs and I could not breath on gasp of air. It was several seconds before I came around to realize what was happening. When I considered the gun and moved to get it, that bear bit at my shoulder and the back of my neck with a vengeance until I laid still. Moving to reach the gun just triggered it's biting more.

When you put yourself in a situation of danger, that gun must be in your hands. If you have a shotgun or long gun, NO SLING!

A slung gun or holstered gun is worthless as I have experienced, it must be in your hands. If you're not focused and dedicated to the point of walking the bush with a gun held in your hands, then you're not really scared and in danger, right? Somebody in the group needs to hold the gun. Pass it around taking turns if need be. Where Grizzly and Brown bears are concerned at least a 30/06 rifle, or a 20 gage minimum should be used. A 12 gage is far better, but it must be used by the group. Multiple guns of different types would be best for the whole group.

Great perspective. Thanks for posting.
 
I haven't personally shot a grizzly, but I've seen several up close. Put me down for a Marlin Guide gun in 45/70 with some serious 400+ grain hardcast in it and a big can of bear spray. MAybe a 454 Casull would work in a big revolver from a stopping power perspective, but I think you'd still have a better chance of 4 quick hits from a short lever gun making than a heavy recoiling revolver in the few seconds that you might have before charging bear is on top of you. Otherwise, I suspect it is mostly wishful thinking.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top