5.56 crimping

Status
Not open for further replies.
Under all but extraordinary circumstance (like combat environments
where ammunition is subject to incredible abuse even before it might
ever make it to the gun...)

"No"


.
 
Neck tension should be high enough to keep bullets from moving.

Chambering a round may cause the OAL to get longer. Or shorter if bullet contacts something on chambering. Run a few rounds in and eject without firing. Measure OAL.

Measure the case neck before and after seating a bullet. After seating the outside diameter should be larger by a minimum of .002" This will give the minimum bullet pull of 35 pounds. More is better in an auto loader.

Check expander diameter. Should be about .2225" or a hair less.

No bullet cannelure, no crimp.

Crimping will help a little , but is not needed with good neck tension.
There is roll , taper and stab crimp types available. Brass is best trimmed to all the same length.

I dont crinp.
 
Last edited:
If the bullet has a cannelure, I set my seating die to lightly crimp into it. If there is no cannelure, no crimp.
 
I’m admittedly somewhat new to bottleneck cartridge reloading. My handgun loads are very consistent and I’m happy with them. Am I missing something that doesn’t crossover to the rifle cartridge world.
 
I’m using 23.3gr AR-Comp with a 55gr Hornady FMJ. Listed velocity for this load is 3100 FPS. I’m averaging 2767 FPS. Granted the test barrel is 20” and I’m using a 16” but I still think that’s a severe drop for an extra 4 inches of barrel length
 
Barrel length makes a difference. The Alliant data uses a 24" barrel to get their velocities, so nothing to compare there.
64 extreme spread over 5 shots
Could be better? My guess. Have not used a chronograph since the 70s.
M16A1 with 14.5 " barrel averaged 2766fps.with a 55 gr Hornady fmj . Spread 113 fps 12 rounds. imr 4198 powder.

Wait and see what other forum members are getting with that powder.
 
Last edited:
Is Hornady using the same data with more then 1 bullet? They seem to use generic data .

Different Bullets make different pressure & velocity.

Alliant data 20190928_205744.jpg maximum loads. Work up as always.
 
Last edited:
In your opinions do you think crimping could effect velocity?

This, as well as a number of other things can result in lower velocities.

Whether the data was tested with a 223 and merely carried over to the 556 data, the chamber dimensions of your rifle, the throat it has, case capacity of your brass, as you stated the barrel length and even more.

If a bullet has a cannelure, and the proper roll crimp was applied tightly, and the measuring devices were sufficiently sensitive, you may be able to tell if the crimp can cause the powder to burn more efficiently or cause some other velocity or pressure change.

Many subtle changes can impact the pressure and burn of a fired cartridge. Loading "into the lands" will give higher pressure and velocity for the same amount of powder. Sometimes dramatically so. As an example.

If I recall, 2800 was about all I could coax from my AR, a Hornady soft point 55 and TAC.

The important thing is if the holes are showing up in the right spot...:)

And don't drive yourself nuts with chronograph numbers yet. It's an AR, if it accurate and works, what more can you ask for?

Wait. Is it an AR? I guess I just inferred from the barrel length what it was. My bad...:confused:
 
Don’t crimp 5.56.

Crimp is a band-aid for a bad charge weight if you have any improvement in consistency. Develop your charge.

Neck tension and crimp are not equivalent.

64fps ES isn’t terribly uncommon for loads which weren’t developed specifically to yield low ES. Non-match bullets, maybe an imperfect powder selection, mixed brass, or mixed firing brass without annealing, inconsistent brass... 64 ES might even be accidentally LOW ES if the load development was simply start low, work high, and look at group size.
 
Not knowing the particular case capacity, but using a default 28.8gr H2O . . .
Quickload gives me 3,017fps out of a 20" barrel, dropping to 2,848 in 16"

Your velocity of 2,767fps isn't all that surprising. (An effective barrellength of 15" would account for it completely)
Also... just a 4% drop in Powder Lot burn rate would also account for it, as would any slight variation in barrel internal dimensions.

Never chase the manufacturer's data ... it'll break your heart like a high-school Prom Queen.
 
Hornady for years doesn't even test 55 gr. loads in an AR, only 26" bolt action. Lazy!! Your overall length is beyond what is recommended with the Hornady 55 FMJ. Hornady says 2.200" and I would seat them out to 2.230" and no longer. Hornady's 55 FMJ has a rounded blunt nose so seating them shorter than more sharply pointed 55 grain bullets is recommended. Your loads are .020-.050" too long. May make some difference in velocity. Not going to get to 3100 fps in a 16" barrel without pushing the safe limit. More often in the 2800-2900 fps with most powders but I'd think 3000 fps may be possible depending on powder, primer, and rifle. Some 55 FMJ's the recommended oal is 2.250" but not with Hornady's 55 FMJ-BT. To each his own method but I like a light crimp on bullets with a cannelure for my AR. No crimp on bullets without a cannelure.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top