Zundfolge
Member
I am curious to see how Glock responds to the firestorm they are about to have hit them (figure by middle of Monday morning someone at Glock will be squirming).
I don't trust 60 minutes any farther then I could throw Ed Bradly, so I'm not ready to start yelling for a boycott.
I would bet even money that La Pierre did say something about ballistic "fingerprints" changing as guns are fired, but 60 minutes never does a story without an agenda, therefore anything that doesn't fit their agenda hits the cutting room floor (more reason I'm not ready to hang Glock ... yet). The folk at 60 minutes are NOT journalists ... they are propagandists.
I wish now I'd watched the 60min in question. I purposely didn't because when I start yelling at the damn TV my poor corgi goes and hides under the bed in the other room
If indeed Glock supports a ballistic fingerprinting database then boycott away (I still think people where too forgiving of Ruger).
I don't trust 60 minutes any farther then I could throw Ed Bradly, so I'm not ready to start yelling for a boycott.
LaPierre did a decent job, but he never pointed out that the "fingerprint" of guns changes as they're fired.
I would bet even money that La Pierre did say something about ballistic "fingerprints" changing as guns are fired, but 60 minutes never does a story without an agenda, therefore anything that doesn't fit their agenda hits the cutting room floor (more reason I'm not ready to hang Glock ... yet). The folk at 60 minutes are NOT journalists ... they are propagandists.
I wish now I'd watched the 60min in question. I purposely didn't because when I start yelling at the damn TV my poor corgi goes and hides under the bed in the other room
If indeed Glock supports a ballistic fingerprinting database then boycott away (I still think people where too forgiving of Ruger).