7.62 Yahweh cartridge, is anyone familiar with it?

Status
Not open for further replies.
LoonWulf said:
Smash up the frame, or blow big enough holes( which the heavier 30 cals are good at) and they usually pile up.......still ive needed to shatter enough critters pelvic bones that i don't expect any single shot to be the end of the conversation.......

Im still curious about the case volume and a diagram....im having a hard time visualizing the cartridge and equating it to the expected performance.
Click to expand...
Any load of 150 grain gold dot at 2500-2650 in any .30 caliber it will do the same thing but the gold dot in the 30-06 it blows up
Too much meat according to my buddy. At The lower speeds we are only getting about a 3-4” of bloodshot and dropping them in their tracks, it seems to be the sweet spot.
 
The inventer said:
Any load of 150 grain gold dot at 2500-2650 in any .30 caliber it will do the same thing but the gold dot in the 30-06 it blows up
Too much meat according to my buddy. At The lower speeds we are only getting about a 3-4” of bloodshot and dropping them in their tracks, it seems to be the sweet spot.
Click to expand...
I've had had issues with 150gr speer btsps, and squirting out their cores. I'm not familiar with the gold dots.
 
Leon tP said:
If shot placement is not the issue, could it then be the bullet? After all, the bullet does the Work.
Click to expand...
I have used Remington core locked sierra 165 game king hollow points (better but destructive) and Nosler ballistic tip165 grain bullets trust me I’ve tried
 
The inventer said:
Any load of 150 grain gold dot at 2500-2650 in any .30 caliber it will do the same thing but the gold dot in the 30-06 it blows up
Click to expand...
As posted earlier, that is a bullet choice problem, not a caliber/cartridge problem.

There is no free lunch. There is nothing new in the world of cartridge improvement either. Anything that can work in one cartridge can work in another.
 
Jim Watson said:
I'm not the ballistician so many of you are, all I know is that he published

View attachment 1204556

So is he truthin' or lyin'?
H.P. White, or the "strain gauge man," or fabrication?

Still haven't got that case drawing, or a measured capacity, though.
Click to expand...
These numbers came from the strain gauge the piezoelectric numbers were higher but 52,000 is the limit
 
Just want to clarify 2600-2650fps with a 150gr bullet, 2.260 COAL, 52k pressure max and we can presume case capacity of 38gr of H20 and a 20 inch barrel

SO less pressure, less case capacity, less barrel length, and same bullet weight than another 30 Cal cartridge that is acutally SAAMI approved and this round supposedly defies physics and bests it in every way... I ain't buying what you selling.

Take a video with an actual firearm firing your actual cartridge over a chronograph and lets see this physic defying wonder cartridge.
 
The inventer said:
A Mosley ballistic tip 165 grain is considered a good bullet
Click to expand...

A hunter watching after hitting them with a 165 NBT from a .30-06 doesn’t know where to hit deer.

The inventer said:
I t would not work well due to the mini 30 having a maximum O.A.L, of 2.200 and the Yahweh is 2.260
Click to expand...

Ruger Mini-30 mag length maximum is 2.2795”.
 
Hello people this my first post on this sight. I never knew this forum existed until a friend told me about this conversation. I know the inventor of this round. I worked with his wife. When she started talking to me about this round, I was very apprehensive about it. And after the Inventor invited me to go to the range and shoot it, I had to go and do it. I saw him shoot several rounds through it and the firearm did not blow up, so I decided to shoot it. I fired the first round and was not impressed. When I fired the second round, I had a Scooby Doo moment. I mean it was "Errrr"? Then he looked at me and said "I forgot to tell you the first round was a standard 7.62x39. The second and third are my rounds.". The first thing that came out of my mouth was " When can I get one"? The difference between the two rounds was night and day. It felt like I was shooting something. I normally shoot a Grendel. And this felt it had a little more pep than my Grendel. And I now own this round. It took a little bit of time to get everything from Inventer but I did. Now, everyone that has shot it is very impressed. I was put off over the name, but after he explained how the name came about, I thought to each his own.
After reading some of these posts, I felt it was wrong to spout off about something you don't understand. I know of 7 people that have shot this round and all were very impressed. BTW, I am not his Pastor. I have not hunted with mine yet. This post is my opinion, and opinions are like a nose, everyone has one.
 
TAgunn said:
Hello people this my first post on this sight. I never knew this forum existed until a friend told me about this conversation. I know the inventor of this round. I worked with his wife. When she started talking to me about this round, I was very apprehensive about it. And after the Inventor invited me to go to the range and shoot it, I had to go and do it. I saw him shoot several rounds through it and the firearm did not blow up, so I decided to shoot it. I fired the first round and was not impressed. When I fired the second round, I had a Scooby Doo moment. I mean it was "Errrr"? Then he looked at me and said "I forgot to tell you the first round was a standard 7.62x39. The second and third are my rounds.". The first thing that came out of my mouth was " When can I get one"? The difference between the two rounds was night and day. It felt like I was shooting something. I normally shoot a Grendel. And this felt it had a little more pep than my Grendel. And I now own this round. It took a little bit of time to get everything from Inventer but I did. Now, everyone that has shot it is very impressed. I was put off over the name, but after he explained how the name came about, I thought to each his own.
After reading some of these posts, I felt it was wrong to spout off about something you don't understand. I know of 7 people that have shot this round and all were very impressed. BTW, I am not his Pastor. I have not hunted with mine yet. This post is my opinion, and opinions are like a nose, everyone has one.
Click to expand...
His first round was a 7.62x39 the other 2 were Yahweh rounds fui
 
Varminterror said:
You are selling dies and barrels, but don’t yet have a cartridge drawing? How did you spec the reamer?
Click to expand...

I was going to ask for a reamer print but figured “the inventer” would say it’s proprietary.

If he doesn’t have a drawing, does he have a cell phone camera? Just a picture of the cartridge would be nice. One with the parent case next to it for perspective.

A google image search for “7.62 YAHWEH” yields squat.
 
TAgunn said:
…. I fired the first round and was not impressed. When I fired the second round, I had a Scooby Doo moment. I mean it was "Errrr"? Then he looked at me and said "I forgot to tell you the first round was a standard 7.62x39. The second and third are my rounds.". The first thing that came out of my mouth was " When can I get one"?
Click to expand...

It sounds like you might have had something akin to a religious experience.

Forgive us heretics for being skeptical but there’s a lot of faith over facts so far with this new cartridge.
 
I wouldn’t shoot anything from someone that would let a “wife’s friend” touch off rounds that weren’t disclosed to him.
Having been on the receiving end of a clandestinely inserted 3inch magnum turkey load, when we were shooting clays with target loads, it just isn’t funny. It’s dangerous frat-boy antics.

The wow factor is the same when someone knows what they are shooting. Surprising them with unknown loads shouldn’t be necessary. Or was that the point? The difference can only be felt if one doesn’t know it’s been overloaded? Then they can be convinced of how much better is was, simply from the increased recoil of an overloaded round?


I’ve been to the website.
When you get there, there’s no “there” there…


All the things we’ve asked to see, and were given, “come to the website and look” are not found there.

I have faith, it does not extend to firearms, or cartridges that defy math. I’m going need some factual proof there, not unrealistic made up numbers, not anecdotal reports of “friends to the inventer.”
Perhaps we are “spouting off” because we an actual understanding of what we speak…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

R
  • Locked
7.62 v. .223: Inherent Accuracy
Replies
8
Views
1K
JShirley
JShirley
S
  • Locked
Question on 7.62 NATO, sold by Winchester
Replies
18
Views
2K
gwtx
G
Dudedog
  • Locked
Mini 30 Russian ammo
Replies
13
Views
3K
MikeFrank
M
T
  • Locked
.223 Saiga AK's - better than 7.62?
Replies
12
Views
3K
MAKOwner
M
C
  • Locked
7.62x39 vs 7.62×51
2
Replies
44
Views
20K
elmerfudd
E
Back
Top