I've never owned a traditional revolver, single or double action, that was longer than 7 1/2" I'm slowly saving my pennies for a Ruger Super Redhawk in .480 I'm toying with the idea of the longer barrel. The recoil on the 480 isn't bad with a 7 1/2", the longer tube will soften it further. A longer sight plane is good. There will be an modest increase in power. I think it will simply be more fun to shoot.
The problem of course, is carrying the thing, pulling it from holster, and just in general having to put up with a large stick in your way as you go about your business.
7 1/2" isn't exactly easy either. There is a lot to be said for the philosophy which states no revolver has any business having a barrel longer than 6 inches. My Super Redhawk in 44 has a barrel of roughly 6 1/2", after I chewed the top of it off. My woods carry guns have barrels of 4" to 5" inches.
If I hunt with the 480 it really doesn't matter much if the barrel is 7 1/2" or
9 1/2"
So I thought I'd ask for the experiences and advice from those who've traveled the lonesome mile with a 10" hogleg strapped somewhere about their person.
Thanks
munk
The problem of course, is carrying the thing, pulling it from holster, and just in general having to put up with a large stick in your way as you go about your business.
7 1/2" isn't exactly easy either. There is a lot to be said for the philosophy which states no revolver has any business having a barrel longer than 6 inches. My Super Redhawk in 44 has a barrel of roughly 6 1/2", after I chewed the top of it off. My woods carry guns have barrels of 4" to 5" inches.
If I hunt with the 480 it really doesn't matter much if the barrel is 7 1/2" or
9 1/2"
So I thought I'd ask for the experiences and advice from those who've traveled the lonesome mile with a 10" hogleg strapped somewhere about their person.
Thanks
munk