A Resolute 18 Year Old Open Carrying:Testing the System in Idaho

Status
Not open for further replies.

Winchester 73

member
Joined
Apr 10, 2007
Messages
1,576
Location
Miami,Florida
My hat's off to this young stalwart.

http://www.cdapress.com/articles/2007/05/20/news/news01.txt

Tuesday April 1, 2008

JEROME A. POLLOS/Press
Zach Doty, 18, and his brother Steven, 15, carry their firearms because they say it is their right and "a right not exercised is a right that can easily be taken away." Police have stopped the brothers twice after reports were called in to 911.
Zach and Steven Doty catch attention of Post Falls citizens, police after being seen
carrying their firearms in public

POST FALLS -- Zach Doty is raising eyebrows by taking the Second Amendment for a walk.
Doty, who turned 18 last month, has been stopped by police twice in the past month after citizens spotted him with a loaded 9mm Glock pistol in a hip holster in plain view.

No citations were issued because Idaho code allows residents 18 and older to openly carry a firearm in public. To carry a concealed weapon, you must be 21 and have a permit.

The second time officers checked out Zach -- on Sunday at Poleline and Greensferry -- his 15-year-old brother, Steven, was carrying a .22-caliber rifle in a sling on his back. Again, there was no wrongdoing because teens 13 to 17, with parental permission, are allowed by Idaho law to carry a rifle.

The home-schooled brothers said they intend to continue to openly carry guns in public on a regular basis for self defense -- both as a crime deterrent and to educate others that it's the public's right.

"I certainly don't anticipate that I'll need to use it, but I'd rather have it and not need it than to not have it and need it," Zach said. "There's no reason for me to hide a weapon."

The brothers have been to the library, grocery stores, parks and other places with the guns. They're not allowed to openly carry on school property, in courthouses or jails.

The brothers sometimes walk the perimeter of Prairie View Elementary and Post Falls High on their way from home to Post Falls Presbyterian Church, where they attend on Poleline. (Not to be confused with Community Presbyterian.) Zach was stopped by police on April 17 while walking to Bible study.

On Friday, police responded to the Q'emiln Park trails after someone reported seeing the Dotys with guns. When they verified that it was the family, they left.

Open carry 101

Zach, who recites sections of the Constitution and court cases about guns with ease, said about 12 people have approached him to inquire about the guns since he began openly carrying a month ago. Others, including some at the Post Falls Library on Thursday, appear curious but don't say anything.

"There have been good opportunities to speak to people," he said. "I make sure they know that open carrying is legal, why I carry and I encourage them to consider doing so themselves."

James Rebal, Coeur d'Alene, notified police after he saw Doty with his pistol on Sunday on Idaho Street.

"I turned back so that my wife could verify what I saw," Rebal said. "He was very nicely dressed and I saw nothing to be concerned about other than the weapon. It's not something you see in Idaho. Virginia Tech was fresh in my mind, and I thought it was better to err on the side of concern."

Rebal said he believes times have changed, even though open carrying has not.

"When I lived in Arizona, some people would have guns, but there was no cause for concern," he said. "It was not often, but it was also not unusual.

"Maybe the world situation now -- terrorists, Virginia Tech, Columbine -- has caused that level of concern. Maybe we're all a little jittery on a national basis and I don't think that that's all bad. It's better to report something suspicious than not."

John Dunlap, commander of American Legion Post 143, said he asked Zach to leave the Legion recently at lunch because he had the pistol.

"He left and came back the next day (without the gun) for soup," Dunlap said, describing the brothers as "well-mannered."

Ed Santos, owner of Center Target Sports in Post Falls and a gun safety instructor, said the Dotys came to his business, but he doesn't sell handgun ammunition to those under 21, and a parental presence is required for teens to shoot at his facility. Santos said, however, just because the teens are carrying guns doesn't mean they are not responsible with them.

"My advice for them is the same as it is with adults -- yes it's your right and yes it's legal, but why draw unnecessary attention to yourself that is not necessary or just because you can?" Santos said. "My hope for anyone who possesses a gun is that they know the basic ground rules of gun safety."

Openly carrying guns is allowable in many states, but Santos said he wonders if having guns in plain view on city streets while just being out and about was the intent of the law writers.

"I believe the intent was to allow it more for hunting and recreation," Santos said.

Zach said he completed a gun safety course in Washington several years ago before he obtained his hunting license.

Open carry reasons

Zach said he's not a radical or paranoid and believes it is not necessary for everyone to openly carry.

"If I was an extremist, our founding fathers would all be extremists," he said, adding that he hopes to start an open carry group. "Without them, we wouldn't have our independence. We'd be a disarmed British system of feudal subjectivity."

Steven said he carries the rifle for self-defense, because it's legal and "to just do it."

"I haven't done it too much, but I'll continue to do it," he said.

The brothers' father, Jude, said he's proud of his sons for exercising their rights.

"None of my seven youth have even shot out a window with a BB gun, but you're more responsible when you walk with your liberties," he said.

Zach said a female cousin and her friend were recently held hostage and molested, so his feelings about carrying a gun as a deterrent has hit close to home. Serious crime happens even in areas that appear to be safe, he said.

"You never expect crime anywhere," he said. "It's not that I'm afraid or paranoid; I just want to be prepared."

He argues that some tragedies such as Virginia Tech could be minimized if open carry was more prevalent, adding that those at scenes can respond quicker than police.

Zach said another reason for open carrying is a "test."

"I'm trying to test to see if the Constitution means anything," he said. "Part of the issue is to test to see exactly how much freedom we have in this nation."

He said the second time police stopped him, it appeared to be harassment because one of the officers indicated he recognized Zach from the previous encounter.

"It's the job of the law to protect people trying to exercise their rights," Zach said.

He believes his Fourth Amendment rights were violated because his gun was seized and disassembled for "no probable cause at all." It was then returned to him.

Zach said he intends to file complaints for false arrest because, even though he was not handcuffed, he was detained for at least 20 minutes.

"Just because (open carrying) is uncommon, it doesn't give them grounds (for a search and seizure)," he said. "(Police) contended that mere suspicion was sufficient, and I rebutted their contention by explaining that reasonable suspicion is grounds for arrest only in felonies."

Police response weapon

Post Falls Police Chief Cliff Hayes said his agency is still adapting to the teens carrying guns.

"Zach is exercising a right given under law to a greater degree than other people have in my 20-plus year history here," he said.

He said officers will continue to respond to calls to verify it is the Dotys and he encourages the public not to assume that it is them.

"We have always stopped people walking with guns in Post Falls," he said. "We check them out and see why. If he was older we would not be stopping him (repeatedly), but he looks young and all of the patrol does not know him yet."

Officers have been given Zach's picture so they can become familiar with him. Hayes said Zach did not notify police he was going to openly carry, so reports of the teens walking with guns caught the agency by surprise.

Zach did not have identification on him to verify he was 18 during Sunday's stop, but his mother responded with a medical card for verification.

"In the future, when the public calls, patrol will drive by and if it is Zach, they will just clear the call without contact," Hayes said. "We'll leave him alone unless a law is being broken."

Hayes said he has met with Zach and Jude to explain some of the public's concern and that many people don't know about the open carry law.

"This is going to alarm some residents, but it is still current law," he said. "Most of the public does not understand that this is legal."

Hayes said he believes businesses and facilities can post gun-free zone signs if they are concerned about the law.

"It is my opinion that that would supersede the guns because it would be in violation of a rule that the business has established," Hayes said.

Zach said gun-free zones don't help anyone except criminals.

Jude, who said he moved his family to Post Falls from Washington about two years ago to flee legal battles, said he does not openly carry.

"I certainly support (Zach and Steven), but I have enough battles of my own," he said. "There should be a very healthy distrust for anyone in authority."

Jude is fighting fines and penalties levied by the Washington Department of Labor and Industries for alleged violations of child labor laws with the family's home-moving business.

"We're on our third layer of court appeals," Jude said. "I'm in court in Yakima virtually every week. We went from a 5,000-square foot house to an RV."

Zach said he knows that carrying a gun is uncommon, but he's trying to change that.

"I'm just trying to exercise a right that I have no reason to hide," Zach said
 
That's an old story

So sorry.It had todays dateline.Fooled the heck out of me!Of course its April Fools Day.That explains the byline!
Tuesday April 1, 2008
Maybe there's a few souls around who haven't heard about the boy's yet.

On an unrelated note, I read on some other website that the kids believe in a geocentric model of the solar system

Yeah,thats as unrelated as we can get.
 
James Rebal said:
It's better to report something suspicious than not.

Hooray for a police state.

Openly carrying guns is allowable in many states, but Santos said he wonders if having guns in plain view on city streets while just being out and about was the intent of the law writers.

"I believe the intent was to allow it more for hunting and recreation," Santos said.

Luckily, Mr. Santos is not the one making or interpreting law.

Police Chief Cliff Hayes said:
"We'll leave him alone unless a law is being broken."

Which is what you should do.

Police Chief Cliff Hayes said:
"This is going to alarm some residents, but it is still current law,"

At least he's somewhat on our side.

All in all, I would say things could have gone much worse for the boys, many police don't realize open carry is legal in most states.
 
That's an old story.

Win73, I hope you didn't take that as me being rude. Upon rereading it, it does seem a little bit "short." Here's a smiley to clarify :D

Regardless of how old a story it is, I still think it's great that these kids are opening people's eyes to responsible open carry. From my two years in Idaho I'm not sure many people would need the education, but I was quite a ways north of Post Falls (Sandpoint) so maybe they are in a less rural setting.
 
"My advice for them is the same as it is with adults -- yes it's your right and yes it's legal, but why draw unnecessary attention to yourself that is not necessary or just because you can?" Santos said.

The most valuable slaves are those who hammer their own leg irons.
 
yes it's your right and yes it's legal, but why draw unnecessary attention to yourself that is not necessary or just because you can?"

Maybe because at 18 he can't carry concealed? If you live in an OC state and aren't old enough to CC despite perhaps not wanting to draw much attention sometimes it's your only choice if you want to be armed. Which is precisely why I'm about to start OCing here in KY soon.
 
How dare this young man exercise his god given and constitutionally protected rights, when it so clearly frightens and upsets some people?

If he's so sure that his life is worth protecting he should stay securely indoors until he turns 21 when he can obtain a CWP and lawfully hide his gun so that his bearing of arms doesn't scare and confuse the people who have been properly raised to be wary of such alarmingly self-reliant people and their tools.

He should be ashamed for being so unashamed :neener:.
 
Well I'm 18 years old, and have open carried a couple of times and was stopped by police once. They too made me put my hands up, and took my firearm, wallet, and pocket knife. After standing around getting run through NCIC checked for felonies they gave all my stuff back and let me on my way. I complained to my police chief of an unlawfull search and seizure but he blew me off. So rather than cause trouble I dropped the matter. If they do it again I will file major complaints and maybe charges
 
Scott,we just had a discussion about this an another thread starting Saturday.
Ohio law reads:
------------> It is illegal, under Ohio Revised Code 2923.21, for a
grown-up to furnish any firearm to a person under 18 or, to furnish a
handgun to a person who is under 21, except for lawful hunting,
sporting, or educational purposes, including, but not limited to,
instruction in firearms or handgun safety, care, handling, or
marksmanship under the supervision or control of a responsible adult.

Here is the thread:
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=351752
 
------------> It is illegal, under Ohio Revised Code 2923.21, for a
grown-up to furnish any firearm to a person under 18 or, to furnish a
handgun to a person who is under 21, except for lawful hunting,
sporting, or educational purposes, including, but not limited to,
instruction in firearms or handgun safety, care, handling, or
marksmanship under the supervision or control of a responsible adult.

If it were illegal for me to posses a handgun I would have been arrested by the officers who stopped me when i was carrying. They knew exactly how old I was, so if 21 was the age to be in possesion, i'd be locked up. Anyways it's straight from the ATF that I can posess, and purchase from private party a handgun at age 18.
 
Quote:
------------> It is illegal, under Ohio Revised Code 2923.21, for a
grown-up to furnish any firearm to a person under 18 or, to furnish a
handgun to a person who is under 21, except for lawful hunting,
sporting, or educational purposes, including, but not limited to,
instruction in firearms or handgun safety, care, handling, or
marksmanship under the supervision or control of a responsible adult.

If it were illegal for me to posses a handgun I would have been arrested by the officers who stopped me when i was carrying. They knew exactly how old I was, so if 21 was the age to be in possesion, i'd be locked up. Anyways it's straight from the ATF that I can posess, and purchase from private party a handgun at age 18

IANAL,Scott.
I'm only citing Ohio Law.
Best of luck.See my signature line.:)
 
If it were illegal for me to posses (possess) a handgun I would have been arrested by the officers who stopped me when i was carrying. They knew exactly how old I was, so if 21 was the age to be in possesion, i'd be locked up. Anyways it's straight from the ATF that I can posess, and purchase from private party a handgun at age 18.

You may be fine according to Federal law, but whoever furnished it to you is certainly not with respect to Ohio law, if the handgun was obtained/given/sold to you in Ohio.

On a related note, the underlying assumption you seem to make is "Police officers know ALL the laws". You and I both know that is not the case. You wouldn't interpret an unlawful charge from those same police officers to be legal, just because they are LEOs, would you? So, don't take the reverse as evidence either.
 
I think it near shameful and quite a sign of the wuss-afication ( to put it in a PG conext)of America. If there is an adult, wearing a gun on his hip, tpeople should not be alarmed. If he's climbing a bell tower by all means call the authorities. But Why is the mere sight of a gun panic inducing? Gun is on its way to becoming to tabo for use( at least on my LIBERAL university) in any sort of conversation. You can see sheeple wince at the mere mention of a gun. An adult walking or otherwise near another adult with a plainly visible firearm should be at an elevated sense of awareness, but not in a RED alert paniac, in need of the autoritites. If you are not comfortable with EVERYONE'S RIGHTS and EVERY right they're entitled to, then by all means cash your chips in and relocate.
 
I think it near shameful and quite a sign of the wuss-afication ( to put it in a PG conext)of America. If there is an adult, wearing a gun on his hip, tpeople should not be alarmed. If he's climbing a bell tower by all means call the authorities. But Why is the mere sight of a gun panic inducing? Gun is on its way to becoming to tabo for use( at least on my LIBERAL university) in any sort of conversation. You can see sheeple wince at the mere mention of a gun. An adult walking or otherwise near another adult with a plainly visible firearm should be at an elevated sense of awareness, but not in a RED alert paniac, in need of the autoritites. If you are not comfortable with EVERYONE'S RIGHTS and EVERY right they're entitled to, then by all means cash your chips in and relocate.

I'm sure most of us agree with you.
But 18 year old Scott, and particularly his parents, have to go by Ohio's vague,gray,ambiguous,poorly written,Revised Code 2923.21 law.
It's a bummer,buts it's there and can land Scott's parents in the slammer.
I'm on his side but.......
I've been arguing his case on 2 other threads.
 
it sounds as if "furnish" is interpreted as lending a weapon in the ohio code, not a purchase.

Agreed.The word "except" in 2923.21 seems to indicate to my mind that you are OK at 18, in the permitted circumstances of lawful hunting,sporting,or educational,purposes,etc.
Except DOES have to mean something, no matter what the lawyers are saying.
 
Last edited:
2923.21 Improperly furnishing firearms to minor
(A) No person shall do any of the following:

(1) Sell any firearm...
(2) Subject to division (B) of this section, sell any handgun...
(3) Furnish any firearm...
(4) Sell or furnish a firearm...
(5) Sell or furnish a handgun...
(6) Purchase or attempt to purchase any firearm with the intent to sell...
(7) Purchase or attempt to purchase any handgun

Doesn't look like posession of a firearm or handun by anyone under 21 is even mentioned.
 
Is it mentioned here?Start with the word "except":

------------> It is illegal, under Ohio Revised Code 2923.21, for a
grown-up to furnish any firearm to a person under 18 or, to furnish a
handgun to a person who is under 21, except for lawful hunting,
sporting, or educational purposes, including, but not limited to,
instruction in firearms or handgun safety, care, handling, or
marksmanship under the supervision or control of a responsible adult
 
Well if the law's got a problem with it and come after my guns they can have them, Bullets first:mad:
 
When I was 18 or 19, I helped Chris Simcox's group (this was pre-Minuteman, it was Civil Homeland Defense at this time) do some night patrols on the US Mexican border. A friend let me borrow a pistol, and we both open carried the entire weekend. No problem from the Border Patrol agents I interacted with, or in Walmart or the coupla gas stations and fast food places we visited. But as far as I can tell AZ is the most common open carry state, in terms of cultural acceptance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top