nalioth
Member
If the quality of Century's Yugo M70 builds are any indication, the M72 should be a quality item.cbrgator said:Any idea of what kind of quality they are?
If the quality of Century's Yugo M70 builds are any indication, the M72 should be a quality item.cbrgator said:Any idea of what kind of quality they are?
Can one of the "better" AK's even be found in that price range? People are snatching up anything that resembles a Kalashnikov. That, along with the dwindling number of parts to build from have driven the prices upward.
I don't think that 4-500 is going to get anything BUT and WASR or a base Saiga and the conversion parts, unless you can find something in the used rack.
The M72 Should be a quality build but it has a long heavy barrel being a RPK clone. (It may feel front heavy) If you can find a Yugo M70A (full stock) or B folding stock they are very well built. I owned the full stock version built on the heavier DCI receiver and it was very solid and a great shooter. Also the M70 comes with a chrome, polished bolt carrier which is a nice touch.
J&G Sales has the M70B for $499.00
http://www.jgsales.com/product_info....oducts_id/1388
The RPK type weapon was not meant for aimed fire, but rather 'walking' your rounds onto the target.jws527 said:The thing that would concern me about the M72 and other RPK type clones is that while they probably make for a much better bench rifle than a standard AK, I can't imagine they'd be nearly as practical or fun to carry and shoot from a standing or otherwise unsupported position
Well, if you compare it to the AR:My main motivation for the AK is because I still can. Why is the AK so uncomfortable to shoot?
I think we're just miscommunicating. In terms of the things that can be objectively measured or defined, I don't disagree with you at all.jws527, you get behind an RPK type sporter and it's gonna be the one of the most accurate "kalashnikov designs" you'll shoot.
jws527 said:-A pistol grip seemingly designed for child soldiers in Africa
-A buttstock that's at least an inch too short Not for squared stance shooting ( not bladed like we're trained / used to )
-A narrow, short handguard
-A safety lever on the wrong side of the receiver which requires a full on hand motion to actuate Which side is the "wrong" side?
-A large, awkward bolt that's much more "interactive" to chamber than the simple bolt release switch on the AR The "simple" bolt release is just another part that wears out (then you're back to 'A large awkward interactive bolt' or a jammed rifle)
-Stout recoil What AK are you shooting? A Mosin has stout recoil. Kalashnikovs have negligible recoil [you did say something about child soldiers, right])
-Heavy See above.
"Well, if you compare it to the AR:"Not sure what Kalashnikovs you're using, but a lot of the "discomfort" is not knowing how they were designed be used and expecting them to work "the American way".
I do.jws527 said:Vote with your dollars - I bought a Kalashnikov.
Asking subjective questions isn't very good for information gathering.cbrgator said:Is the underfolder stock more or less comfortable than a standard stock?
I find folders extremely uncomfortable to shoot, and there is almost no way to get a solid cheek weld. But that's just my opinion, others like them just fine.Is the underfolder stock more or less comfortable than a standard stock