Amazing!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.

ken grant

Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2004
Messages
622
Location
middle Ga.
It is amazing how such a little change can make such a big difference in the feel of recoil in a 1911. :what: :D
For the first time today, I shot both a Colt Combat Commander and a Norinco Compact at the same range session. The Norinco seemed to have much less recoil than the Colt and didn't rise as much on firing.
The only difference in the pistols were the firing pin stops. The Colt had the stock stop in it and the Norinco had a stop 1911 Tuner had put in(oversized) with a very little radius on the bottom.
I plan on fitting stops to all my 1911's with the small radius on the bottom. It really makes a difference in recoil feel. :D
 
ken- would it be possible for you to post photos of each firing pin stop side by side?

Thanks. :)
 
Why Tuner ...

How can you be so easily fooled ??? This is something that the New School folks don't use, and is therefore hopelessly obsolete ... :neener: :D
 
Fuff has a point. Unless it is properly endorsed by a real Pistolsmith (tm), it may be a questionable practice.
 
Stop!

Ken...I fear that you have awakened a sleeping giant. You've probably just
sold about 2,000 EGW firing pin stops with one stroke of the keyboard.
George oughta give you a kickback...or at least a discount on a few of the things. :p

Riley...The standard stop has a 7/32nd inch radius. The original...like Ken has...was/is .075-.080 inch, with .078 bein' print spec.

Fuff...I just never took any of the new-fangled stuff too seriously I reckon. I gave myself a headache makin' a handful of the old design stops...and then 20 years later along comes EGW with the dang things semi-finished and oversized to boot...for 10 bucks a copy! (They're about 20 now)

Now then...I'll leave it to ya'll to figger out WHY it has that effect. :neener:
Keenan and Fuff know why. Thinkin' caps on and....GO!
 
Well, you see, the lower end of the firing pin stop is the part that contacts and pushes back the hammer on recoil. When it's radiused, it makes for a smoother, more even rearward movement of the slide, because the hammer begins to move sooner.
 
Why ask Why

Riley said:

> a smoother, more even rearward movement of the slide, because the hammer begins to move sooner.<

Nope! You're thinkin' about it backward.

Clew:

The smaller radius actually causes the hammer to move more abruptly...once it starts. :scrutiny:
 
OK Tuner, since you're not going to 'splain it (at least right away), I'll give it another shot. Since the hammer begins to move later rather than sooner, the felt recoil is reduced because........??? the time the pistol is in recoil is shortened?

Why does this stuff make my head hurt?
 
Does it have to do with the lock time being extended by additional force required by the slide to get moving with the leverage being closer to the fulcrum of the hammer?

The bullet and gas has progressed down the barrel longer before the slide starts moving imparting more energy to the heavier mass of the gun and frame. When the slide does start moving it has a lower velocity so when it reaches the full back position it hits the frame with less force. So, the recoil impulse is spread out with more initially and less at the end of the cycle reducing muzzle flip and felt recoil.

Or something like that.

That should be close right?

Edit: I might be cheating though because I researched this before buying my Delta Elite ;) Mostly here: http://www.geocities.com/mr_motorhead/10tech.html
 
Tuner ...

You still ain't got it ...

To be a "piss-to'l 'smith you have to be a PROFESSIONAL ... :neener:

The reason that firing pin stop works is because it's the way John Browning designed it. Unfortunately someone in the Army decided it should be changed. Things haven't been right since. :fire: :mad: :D
 
Anybody have high speed pictures?

There's a lovely discussion by some very smart people on another board with interesting thoughts - including talking about how nice it would be to have pictures - anybody have references to controlled tests with observed distinctions?

Of course as some have said comparing recoil in a 1911 across different shooters can be a waste - Layne Simpson reported trying to do a controlled test of ports and compensators with friction on a Ransom Rest and not getting anyplace.
 
Don't let them get your goat 'Tuner (I know you won't anyway). Professional doesn't mean you're any good. Just means you're paid for it. ;)

To steal a member's sig line I saw a while back: Professionals built and operated the Titanic. Amatures built and sailed the Arc. :neener:
 
Bingo!

The Black Snowman nailed it square on the hittin' place!

The smaller radius decreases the slide's mechanical advantage in cocking the hammer. The slide is delayed for a fraction of a nanosecond, and bleeds off
a good bit of the recoil impetus. The slide moves a little slower and with less force, and softens the blow to the frame...quite a bit, as Ken noted.

Also...Since the slide's delay gives the chamber pressure a tick longer to fall off, the extractor doesn't have to work as hard to break the casing's grip on the chamber walls during primary extraction...and in some instances will actually allow surprisingly reliable function with the extractor removed. Other things contribute to that little trick...but I've seen some pistols that wouldn't quite do it...until the firing pin stop radius was reduced...and it pushed'em over the edge.

The small radius utilizes more of the mainspring's resistance to hammer movement...and allows the use of lighter recoil springs with little or no reduction in frame protection. So there you have it...The original, Browning-designed shock buffer...and it doesn't shred or fall apart every thousand rounds. :p
 
Tests

Clark made a good point, and spot on. Give 5 people the same gun and ammo, and all will report different recoil impressions. A side-by-side test,
like Ken's experience can be revealing though. Even better is to change only the stops in the same gun. The difference is real, and depending on the
mainspring and recoil spring load, it can make quite a noticeable difference.

Looky at what you started Ken! A genuine discussion! Kudos lad...Kudos! :cool:
 
Amazing. This is exactly what Ted Yost is doing to my Delta Elite, to keep the slide from beating the frame to death.

Just amazing what a quality oriented 'smith can come up with to actually solve little issues like this.

I think Ted has headspacing gauges too!
 
More

ROFL Snake Eyes! Go to your room! :evil:

Shootcraps, you can get the parts from Brownells. I think they're about 18 bucks now, unless you qualify for the discount...then they're 15. There are two types...Original/series 70 design, and Series 80. the one with the -100
prefix is the Series 80, while the -058 is the original or Series 70. I may be confused though...I'll check to verify and report back. If I don't get back with it, the above numbers apply.

Yes. They require fitting. They come with a dead square bottom and you have to cut the radius. They're also over-width and require filing to fit the slide. I do'em with a light press-fit to keep the extractor honest. Fit to the slide without the extractor first and check firing pin operation...Then fit with the extractor in place.
 
Tuner:

>> ... but I've seen some pistols that wouldn't quite do it...until the firing pin radius was reduced...and it pushed'em over the edge. <<

TYPO ALERT!! I think you mean "firing pin STOP radius was reduced."

Of course I am perfect in respect to typos ... and only my ego exceeds my good looks ... :uhoh: :evil: :D

Fuff...ya got me! yes...Firing pin STOP radius.

Cheers, ya old sharpie.
 
Stop

Buy at Brownells and they have to be fitted.
Tuner told me how to do it. :D
It's also amazing the things Tuner can do at his kitchen table with a file,scrape and a stone. :what:
 
"bleeds off" ? - Can't fool Newton - where does it go?

"bleeds off" ? - Can't fool Newton - where does it go?

I can see an energy delta going to heat in squeezing the rear of the slide/slide stop just a tad in a not quite perfectly elastic collision with the hammer - extra energy going to heat and vibration in the mainspring - but it sounds as though less energy is going into the recoil spring - what about conservation of momentum?

Sort of reminds me of the Blish lock - did that actually bleed off recoil to do just a little bit of unnecessary good?
 
Foolin' with Newton

Ah Clark! Picky picky picky! Shoulda gone into a little more detail. The
reduced mechanical leverage against the hammer and mainspring is the bleedin' mechanism. The mainspring absorbs the impetus at the beginning...the same way as a heavier than standard recoil spring slows the slide near the end of the recoil stroke...or maybe that ain't exactly the right way to explain it. :cool:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top