Americans call for gun freedom (UK article)

Status
Not open for further replies.

gunsmith

member
Joined
May 8, 2003
Messages
5,906
Location
Reno, Nevada
Americans call for gun freedom
By Kati Whitaker
BBC Radio 4's Crossing Continents

In the aftermath of the Virginia Tech massacre, many Americans have been campaigning for permission to carry guns in more places, even churches and schools.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/crossing_continents/6266558.stm

_42458436_suzanne.jpg

"Imagine you are in a restaurant and a mad man is walking around from table to table, pointing a gun, taking aim and pulling the trigger, going to the next person, taking aim, pulling the trigger and so on," says Suzanna Hupp.

"Even if you have chosen not to have a gun with you - don't you hope the guy behind you has one? Just imagine that."

But Suzanna Hupp does not have to imagine.

It was October 1991 when a gunman entered the diner where Suzanna, a Texan chiropractor, was having lunch with her parents.

The man methodically executed 23 people including Suzanna's parents.

Suzanna had a gun. But since Texan state law at the time banned people from carrying guns in public places, she had left it in her car.

"I was angry at my legislators because they had legislated me out of the right to protect myself and my family."

The massacre was, until Virginia Tech, the largest mass shooting by a single gunman in the US.

Now, in the wake of that tragedy, Suzanna is one of a growing body of Americans campaigning for the availability of more, rather than fewer, guns.

"Nobody could have stopped that guy from the first couple of murders but it sure wouldn't have been a body bag total of 32," she says.

Gun sales

Statistics are hard to come by, but at Saxet Gun Show in Austin Texas, there was plenty of anecdotal evidence to back the claim that since Virginia Tech, more Texans, at least, are now applying for licences to carry guns.

At a huge convention centre in the southern suburbs of Austin, Judith Baker of A Texas Girl's Guns firearm sales company was talking a young woman through the safety features on her new handgun.

"Gun sales have gone up since Virginia Tech. Not just my own sales but many dealers and distributors have also increased their gun sales," she says.

"And we are not just talking men here but I am seeing a lot more women wanting to get their concealed handgun licence.

"I am glad to see that women are learning to protect themselves."

Some 48 states in the US issue licences to allow the carrying of concealed weapons to those who pass a background check.

But states vary in their restrictions. Thirty eight states, including Virginia, ban weapons at schools.

In Texas, certain places like churches, courthouses and schools, are designated "gun-free zones".

It is an exception that Texas governor Rick Perry recently challenged with the wholehearted endorsement of campaigners like Suzanna Hupp.

"It is my fervent belief that when legislators create a list of places where people can't carry guns, what they have actually done is create a shopping list for a mad man," he said.

Guns in classes

Andrew Sugg is a student of aviation science at Baylor University at Waco and a member of the newly formed national body Students for Concealed Carry on Campus.

He is spearheading a campaign for students to be allowed to carry concealed firearms into the classroom. I actually got angry that Virginia Tech had said 'no you can't have a gun', and here's this incident, the second-largest school shooting in the world and no-one could do anything about it," he says.

"Now, when I walk into my own class, I have to think: 'Where do I want to sit so I can make a quick getaway?'

"I look at my book bag and think: 'What can I throw at someone who comes through the door? What could I do to stall him and let everybody get away or what can I do to stop him from doing this?'."

It is a mindset that is of considerable worry to the campus police force.

Lethal combination?

Baylor University has a dedicated force of 24 police officers who are trained and drilled to respond to a firearms attack such as that at Virginia Tech.

Its chief, James Doak, said that the potential for strife is considerable among its 14,000 18-to-22 years-olds - whether it is stress of exams, girlfriend problems or simply hot tempers.

Add guns to the equation and the combination could be lethal.

"We cannot rely on students who have not been drilled in these situations to respond properly. Would they freeze up? Would they have a sense of terror in their hearts so they respond inappropriately?" he says.

"Our officers have a level of life experience which students can't possibly have at the age of 21 or 22."

But like many other Americans, Mr Sugg points to the Second Amendment, the right to keep and bear arms, as a fundamental justification for his position.

"Guns are to me a freedom, that is what won us our freedom during the revolutionary war and we've had them ever since," he says.

BBC Radio 4's Crossing Continents was broadcast on Thursday, 5 July 2007 at 1102 BST.

It will be repeated on Monday, 9 July 2007 at 2030 BST.
 
Last edited:
"We cannot rely on students who have not been drilled in these situations to respond properly. Would they freeze up? Would they have a sense of terror in their hearts so they respond inappropriately?" he says.

He would rather rely on students to die.
 
Excellent thread.

You know, money talks. Our solution is really simple. No guns...no money! If a business posts no weapons signs, do not do business there. Send them a quarterly letter detailing each time you went else where, and let them get a feel for the running total lost in sales.

If a state does not allow CCW, or open carry, do not travel there. Also, send the state-level politicians a message that you plan to making large purchases in a state that is pro-gun...cars, frigs, etc. Order them on-line. Advise them that this is the immediate plan, and that the intermediate plan to vote them out! Then, follow through with the vote. If they still win, follow up with a letter and continue on; recruits others.

Doc2005
 
Some of those students have more trigger time and comparable training to the "uber-cops".
 
Our officers have a level of life experience which students can't possibly have at the age of 21 or 22.

Yeah, but I bet some of the 18 year olds at VT have more experience than these Baylor cops with psychotic killers.
 
Yeah, I'm sure that the cops at Virginia Tech were trained for it as well. In fact, their training was so good, it prevented the murder of dozens of innocents....oh, wait...scratch that :rolleyes:
 
I think the whole police are trained and "normal people can't hadle a gun argument is ludacrous. I'm not sure where the theory that an LEO with a gun is superior to everyone else came from. Some non LEO may be better trained with a firearm and vice versa. It all depends on the amount of training you do. I also noticed most of these comments are from people that do not live in the US. I don't feel they can really make such a broad comment.

I don't think they understand the whole process behind getting a cwp, and they are not familiar with firearms. Therefore, we mustn't know how to use them either. Different country, different situation.
 
Our officers have a level of life experience which students can't possibly have at the age of 21 or 22.

So now you need to be old to protect yourself? I'm sick of this garbage mentality. People have been wussified to the point that IMHO most high school grads wouldn't know how to fight back. Heck if they did and lost they'd get a pat on the back for trying.

Relying on others for your safety is childish.

Maybe Oleg would like to use that for a poster?

That line with a mom holding a frightened child in one arm and a Sig* in the other. Maybe I'll give it a try.

*Well maybe just a pistol, but why not a nice one!
 
Ha!

Whats this "anecdotal evidence" about "more Texans applying for their CHL"?

My first class 10 years ago, then 4 yrs later my renewal, my class had 7-8 people in it. When I renewed again last December ther were 20 people in that class. My instructor said that was about average AND he had added 2 more classes per week (Sunday and on Friday or Thursday).

Now that might be just in my area (Galveston - Texas City) and likely more to the post-Katrina nonsense. But from what I have seen week to week in my trips to the range, a steady (and increasing) stream of CHL students.

There's nothing "anectdotal" about that.

As an aside, I look at all these nerdy looking guys and some upscale women (dressed like they were going to an awards ceremony in some cases - instead of range work) who probably haven't had much trigger time (there's an understatement :evil:) and I wonder if thats what I looked like when I first took the class. :p
 
I got the same reaction from a police officer in my American Government class. I brought up Virginia Tech and that wouldn't it be better if someone had concealed carry there? He said that he would rather take a chance throwing a chair then some goober with a handgun. I pointed out that none of us in our supposed gun free zone had been searched or gone through a metal detector upon entry. They would rather be armed with hope and a prayer that nothing happens then let guns come around.
 
I wouldn't put good training and cop in the same sentence most of the time.
People who play paint ball may have better training.
When faced with a gun man that wants to kill you the abilility to move and shoot when being shot at is key.
 
The class was either apathetic or agreed with him, the proffesor certainly did. On a seperate occasion I said I was happy that the "Assault weapon" ban had sunseted, she said: "Why do you need an assault weapon? Those are for killing people." I stated that is exactly what we need them for. I suggested that the 2nd amendment was to there to ensure that the people can not be governed without their consent. She seemed shocked. Shocked I tell you. American Government Class. On the Constitution. So I whipped out the best Madison quote I could think of: "Americans need never fear their government
because of the advantage of being armed, which the Americans
possess over the people of almost every other nation."

I can see the logic, perverted as it may be, that some have against private gun ownership. But to deny it is a constitutionaly right is wilful ignorance at best, and a disregard for the constituion at worst. If they are willing to take that right away, what would lead one to believe that will be the stopping point and not the beginning?
 
Last edited:
I look at all these nerdy looking guys and some upscale women (dressed like they were going to an awards ceremony in some cases - instead of range work) who probably haven't had much trigger time (there's an understatement )

Appearances can be deceiving. I may look like some nerdy guy with no trigger time off in the real world, but the reality is a heckuva lot different. :)
 
thanks for the good replies

Our officers have a level of life experience which students can't possibly have at the age of 21 or 22.

My friend Sam "Trout" Barbetta died in Iraq before his 22nd birthday, I would rather have Trout in any firefight then that cop!
 
article said:
Our officers have a level of life experience which students can't possibly have at the age of 21 or 22.

So let me get this straight: One must be at least 23 years old to qualify for being a police officer now?
 
"We cannot rely on students who have not been drilled in these situations to respond properly. Would they freeze up? Would they have a sense of terror in their hearts so they respond inappropriately?" he says.

The question that begs asking is "Where have these trained officers been when the shooting starts?" If I remember correctly there have been several instances where the first responders were waiting for backup while the shooting continued ala Columbine.

No, I would rather them have the gun and not need it then to need it and not have it and have to "wait for backup."

Just my opinion.
 
Lethal combination?

Baylor University has a dedicated force of 24 police officers who are trained and drilled to respond to a firearms attack such as that at Virginia Tech.

Its chief, James Doak, said that the potential for strife is considerable among its 14,000 18-to-22 years-olds - whether it is stress of exams, girlfriend problems or simply hot tempers.

Add guns to the equation and the combination could be lethal.

Here's the mentality I just can't understand.
In the first part, we're discussing a continuation of an existing clause. People who already have a CHL can carry on campus. Were these people already lethal off campus? Why do these idiots think that coming onto campus will suddenly change these CHL holders into raving monsters? Are they saying something is fundamentally wrong with their campus that it makes people dangerous?

In the second part, the "what could happen" bit ("could be lethal") good policy is NOT made based on guesswork and what "might" happen. If you do that you can make a damned policy on everything and anything.

Man I'd never do such vandalism, but sometimes I feel like driving around to various colleges, finding out exactly where their property line is and spraypainting a "warning" line across the entrance with a sign that says "WARNING, your right to self defense ends here".
 
Overall, this is impressive for a UK article. The typical school response is to be expected.

Add guns to the equation and the combination could be lethal.

Once again, they act like they're handing out guns to every student who enrolls, and the angry-failing-exams-with-relationship-problems students get to cut to the front.


Some of those students have more trigger time and comparable training to the "uber-cops".

I probably have more of both than the campus police at my university, and I don't really have that much.
 
Relying on others for your safety is childish.

Maybe Oleg would like to use that for a poster?

That line with a mom holding a frightened child in one arm and a Sig* in the other. Maybe I'll give it a try.

*Well maybe just a pistol, but why not a nice one!


I like this idea, but I would have two pictures. One with a little boy hiding behind his mom, and one with a grown man hiding behind another man, maybe a cop. Show him looking scared and how ridiculous it looks to be cowering behind someone else.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top