http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=272652709
Before I'd pay that price, I'd have to have irrefutable proof that it is what he says it is. But, I'd love to have a nickel plated '75 Remington .44-40.
The beaded holster looks nice, but it appears to be in a lot better condition than the gun.
When I see a beaded or tack decorated anything that's being represented as an American Indian object, I immediately get suspicious.
Far too many run of the mill guns have been faked with brass tacks in the interest of getting more money than it's worth.
A beaded holster that's in a LOT better shape than the gun that's supposed to go with it, from the same period, sends my red flags up.
I'm not accusing the seller of anything. I'd just prefer provenance with an item if I'm going to pay that much for it.
And I would LOVE to have that one. The older I get, the more I like the Remington revolvers.
Before I'd pay that price, I'd have to have irrefutable proof that it is what he says it is. But, I'd love to have a nickel plated '75 Remington .44-40.
The beaded holster looks nice, but it appears to be in a lot better condition than the gun.
When I see a beaded or tack decorated anything that's being represented as an American Indian object, I immediately get suspicious.
Far too many run of the mill guns have been faked with brass tacks in the interest of getting more money than it's worth.
A beaded holster that's in a LOT better shape than the gun that's supposed to go with it, from the same period, sends my red flags up.
I'm not accusing the seller of anything. I'd just prefer provenance with an item if I'm going to pay that much for it.
And I would LOVE to have that one. The older I get, the more I like the Remington revolvers.